Originally Posted by
Nolan Kienitz
On the flip side of that I was talking to a project superintendent in the last week or so and he was concerned due to the number of times the city wanted to see the hydro-tub bonding.
He counted 4 separate inspections that he had experienced where the H-T bonding was part of the inspection. He was wondering just how many times they had to see the "same bonding"??
Now ... PEX was not involved in this property, but I've also seen the #8 run to the ground rod as well.
Stating as 'not required ... due to PEX' is bull stuffing from my understanding and view.
Nolan:
I think so too. Additionally, NEC 110.3(B) is pretty specific in saying that "Listed or labeled equipment
shall be installed and used in accordance with
any instructions included in the listing or labeling".
Any other opinions out there? I know this subject must've been broached before, but I could not find a reference to it in the archives. So, forgive me if I am repeating something recently discussed.
Surely JP and JM cannot remain silent on this for long. . .
Aaron