Originally Posted by
Richard Rushing
I think it's pretty simple... if it requires a repair, that usually does not trigger a permit requirement and a subsequent code compliant inspection.
Unfortunately, you are correct to a point "that
usually does not trigger a permit", however, the (bold and italics are mine) "
requirement and a subsequent code compliant inspection" are still there.
From the 2006 IRC (and it is this way in most codes). (bold and underlining are mine)
- R105.1 Required.
Any owner or authorized agent who intends to construct, enlarge, alter, repair, move, demolish or change he occupancy of a building or structure, or to erect, install, enlarge, alter, repair, remove, convert or replace any electrical, gas, mechanical or plumbing system, the installation of which is regulated by this code, or to cause any such work to be done, shall first make application to the building official and obtain the required permit.
- R105.2 Work exempt from permit.
Permits shall not be required for the following. Exemption from permit requirements of this code shall not be deemed to grant authorization for any work to be done in any manner in violation of the provisions of this code or any other laws or ordinances of this jurisdiction.
(then it goes on to list a lot of SMALL things.)
Jim,
That section right there sets out and defines what you are seeking, and R105.2 specifically states what is 'exempt' from permits.
It really does not take a group to decide that, it is stated right there.
BUT ...
... getting cooperation from the building department 'to assist' owner/builders (that is what they are called) is a reasonable manner - THAT is what would solve the problems I see you talking about.
AVOIDING 'having to get permits' *IS NOT* the way.