(underlining is mine)
Originally Posted by
Tony Mount
One must be repaired because of dangerous reasons, damaged, not performing its intended function. The other is somthing that IS preforming its function, may not be up to code, and should be noted in the report.
Tony,
I've watched and read as you have made that same transition many times before, stating one to create a higher standards, then stating the other to try to justify your low standard.
In reality, the first one is correct and should be used and applied in both instances: "
its intended function"
However if the system IS PREFORMING ITS FUCTION you are lible if you state the system is NOT up to CODE,
Just like the information in your other post ... you have apparently no idea what you are talking about.
You probably like those corrugated flexible tail pieces as they can catch and trap diamonds and are easier to find and recover.
