View Single Post
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 04-26-2007, 10:16 AM
Eric Van De Ven's Avatar
Eric Van De Ven Eric Van De Ven is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: South Florida
Posts: 216
Re: exposed roofing nails
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jerry Peck View Post
No, that's not a correct statement either.

I'll try it again.

"I thought that the previous posts to mine might cause someone to report that replacement was needed for all shingles with exposed nails.... "

That is a correct statement.

"obviously this is one exception."

Obviously, but not as stated below:

"If they are covered with roof cement, they aren't exposed!"

Totally incorrect.

The *obvious* "one exception" is that last ridge shingle which must be face nailed with its nails exposed. This is because there is no other shingle to be installed over it, it *is* *the* *last* shingle to be installed.

So, with that "one exception", the nails in *that one shingle* are allowed to be covered with plastic roof cement.

Covering *other* nails in *other* shingles does not constitute them 'not being exposed', they still are, they are exposed out from under a shingle. Those *other* nails in the *other* shingles are exposed, meaning that *those shingles need to be replaced*.

Obviously. (So I thought ... obviously.)
To continue the thought, the nails in the photo at the top of the thread are exposed and moreover, were not installed according to the nailing pattern. Some shingles have lines where the nails must go.
__________________
Eric Van De Ven Magnum Inspections Inc. (954) 340-6615
www.magnuminspections.com
I still get paid to be suspicious when I got nothing to be suspicious about!
Reply With Quote