When checking out E7O ins, doesn't anyone but me get upset with this referring coverage that is part of all I have found. It's bad enough that it gives incentive to assure that Re's ins cos will drag us in.
But it seems to me that it legitimizes a relationship that our licensing authorities forbid. It is clear that we are supposed to act in the best interests of our Clients only. Yet we are being forced to buy policies that provide protection for someone who we are not supposed to have a relationship with.
I showed some literature to an RE friend. She looked them over and said "Oh my God. They have just given every sleazy Agent a free pass to search out the worst Inspector they can find. That referring agent thing ought to be illegal. I wonder why we don't have to cover you?
"