Jim B. Robinson
06-12-2009, 10:49 AM
I'm currently studying HI - didn't know what other forum to post to.
This is in reference to plywood facts, not the inspection process. Our exterior inspection manual states "There are always an odd number of layers." And the next paragraph states: "Panels are always strongest in their long axis, though, since there are always more plies with their grain oriented with the long axis."
This didn't sound correct, so I took a jaunt down to my basement to look at some cut-offs. The 1/2" CanPly DouglasFirPlywood is 4 plys thick, each layer approx. 1/8". The two center core plys are oriented in the same direction and together oriented 90deg. between the face and back.
Another issue states: "(The tongue-and-groove approach is only common with plywood)" This is incorrect as 5/8" OSB t&g is readily available, in my locale anyway.
I've searched the net for other sources, with little luck, so here I am asking for plywood facts. I realize this doesn't involve inspection per se, I just like to know I'm reading/learning qualified material.
Comments?
Thanks,
Jim
This is in reference to plywood facts, not the inspection process. Our exterior inspection manual states "There are always an odd number of layers." And the next paragraph states: "Panels are always strongest in their long axis, though, since there are always more plies with their grain oriented with the long axis."
This didn't sound correct, so I took a jaunt down to my basement to look at some cut-offs. The 1/2" CanPly DouglasFirPlywood is 4 plys thick, each layer approx. 1/8". The two center core plys are oriented in the same direction and together oriented 90deg. between the face and back.
Another issue states: "(The tongue-and-groove approach is only common with plywood)" This is incorrect as 5/8" OSB t&g is readily available, in my locale anyway.
I've searched the net for other sources, with little luck, so here I am asking for plywood facts. I realize this doesn't involve inspection per se, I just like to know I'm reading/learning qualified material.
Comments?
Thanks,
Jim