Log in

View Full Version : Elevator equipment in bedroom closet



mathew stouffer
09-02-2009, 10:29 AM
Anyone familiar with elevator equipment. This electrical equipment was housed in a bedroom closet.

Jerry Peck
09-02-2009, 10:59 AM
Mat,

Is that overcurrent protection in the gray cabinet enclosure or just a disconnect?

Speedy Petey
09-02-2009, 12:56 PM
Is that overcurrent protection in the gray cabinet enclosure or just a disconnect?That was the first thing that popped into my head as well.

mathew stouffer
09-02-2009, 01:21 PM
It was a breaker but the box was locked and of course no one had the key.

Jerry Peck
09-02-2009, 01:24 PM
It was a breaker but the box was locked and of course no one had the key.

"It was a breaker ... "

Not allowed in clothes closets.

Are you sure it was not just a "molded case switch" serving as a disconnect?

Wayne Carlisle
09-02-2009, 01:45 PM
The picture don't look like it is in a clothes closet. So it may be okay.


Not be located where they will be in the vicinity of easily
ignitible material such as in clothes closets.

mathew stouffer
09-02-2009, 01:46 PM
15 and 20 amp breakers.

Jerry Peck
09-02-2009, 01:51 PM
was housed in a bedroom closet.


The picture don't look like it is in a clothes closet.


That's why I picked up on "clothes closet". :D

I'm guessing that to the right of that divider is the clothes closet portion of the closet.

Jim Robinson
09-02-2009, 01:54 PM
Was this a single family residence? Would that make a difference for common equipment locked out of use for residents if it were a condo or apartment building?

Wayne Carlisle
09-02-2009, 01:57 PM
It's not the "locked out" that's a problem. It's a fire hazard in an area with ignitible material. If that is what you are asking.

Jerry Peck
09-02-2009, 02:02 PM
Would that make a difference for ...


No. No difference at all.

In fact, the code says "such as" "clothes closets", but what it is really talking about it "easily ignitable material" and the direct mention of "clothes closets" stopped AHJ from saying 'Oh, clothes? They are not "easily ignitable material".', when in fact clothes are.

Many AHJ were thinking 'easily explosive material' while reading "easily ignitable" material. They were not thinking about how readily clothes ignite.

mathew stouffer
09-02-2009, 02:07 PM
It was a town home, and its the developers unit. I think there was some "good old boys" stuff going on here with the AHJ.

John Steinke
09-02-2009, 03:58 PM
It certainly looks to me that a deliberate effort was made to convert this from a 'closet' into an 'equipment room.' As such, it's not a closet anymore - and it looks like they've done a fine job of preventing that area from being used for storage.

The box is actually the control panel. Were you to open it, you'd find all manner of relays and circuit boards. The breaker is both the disconnecting means and the overload protection for the elevator. This is NOT a panel, at least not in the sense that the NEC wanted to ban from clothes closets!

As to the lack of a key for access .... most places have extremely strict rules about elevators, and only elevator contractors can work on them. Even the local electrical contractor is not allowed to open that box.

Jerry Peck
09-02-2009, 04:43 PM
It certainly looks to me that a deliberate effort was made to convert this from a 'closet' into an 'equipment room.' As such, it's not a closet anymore - and it looks like thay've done a fine job of preventing that area from being used for storage.


I agree they made a "deliberate effort" ... however, we all see "deliberate efforts" made all the time to try to circumvent the code, and it basically always ends up like that photo - "wasted effort".

I disagree that the closet is no longer a closet. It is within the "same space" within the enclosed area, which is walled in and has a door - it is still "a closet".

mathew stouffer
09-03-2009, 08:43 PM
here are a few close up pics of the equipment.