PDA

View Full Version : TPR Valve Queastion



Stephen G Sheldon
11-16-2009, 02:30 PM
Attached is a connection to a TPR valve. My question is whether or not the valve shown in the picture is legal or proper. It is my undersatnding that there are to be no valves connected to a TPR. Anyone know the answer?

John Arnold
11-16-2009, 02:34 PM
No way. No how. Plus, the drain pipe isn't allowed to go up, which it seems to be doing.

Rick Cantrell
11-16-2009, 03:13 PM
John
Don't be so sure, Georgia has some amendments that address this.


SECTION 504
SAFETY DEVICES
*Revise Section 504.6.1 ‘Discharge’ of the Georgia Amendments revised January 1, 2002 and rename ‘Relief discharge.’
504.6.1 Relief discharge. The relief valve shall discharge full size, separately to a safe place of disposal such as a concrete floor, outside the building, an indirect waste receptor, or other approved location. The discharge shall terminate in a manner that does not cause injury to occupants in the immediate area or structural damage to the building. The discharge pipe shall not be trapped. When the relief valve discharge piping goes upward a thermal expansion control device shall be installed on the cold water distribution or service pipe in accordance with Section 607.3.2 (GA Amendments). Provisions shall be made at the low point to drain the trapped portion of the discharge pipe.
(Effective January 1, 2005)

I'm not sure if that amendment is still in use.

Jerry McCarthy
11-16-2009, 05:35 PM
At least its not a deadly as this home made IED !!! :eek: :eek:

John Arnold
11-16-2009, 07:46 PM
...The discharge pipe shall not be trapped....Provisions shall be made at the low point to drain the trapped portion of the discharge pipe.

Whaaa?

Rick Cantrell
11-17-2009, 05:14 AM
Originally Posted by Rick Cantrell http://www.inspectionnews.net/home_inspection/images/ca_evo/buttons/viewpost.gif (http://www.inspectionnews.net/home_inspection/plumbing-system-home-inspection-commercial-inspection/16526-tpr-valve-queastion-post108889.html#post108889)
...The discharge pipe shall not be trapped....Provisions shall be made at the low point to drain the trapped portion of the discharge pipe.

Whaaa?

Hey, I didn't write it, I just posted it!

Lawrence Transue
11-17-2009, 05:42 AM
No question this is incorrect.

Assuming a home owner installed this, it would be interesting to ask them what they were thinking?

Rick Cantrell
11-17-2009, 06:48 AM
Lawrence
Not so fast.

John
I found the current version of the amendment

504.6 Requirements for discharge piping. The relief valve shall discharge full size, separately to a safe place of disposal such as a concrete floor, outside the building, an indirect waste receptor, or other approved location. The discharge shall terminate in a manner that does not cause injury to occupants in the immediate area or structural damage to the building. When the relief valve discharge piping goes upward, a thermal expansion control device shall be installed on the cold water distribution or service pipe in accordance with Section 607.3.2. If the discharge pipe is trapped, provisions shall be made to drain the low point of the trapped portion of the discharge pipe.
(Effective January 1, 2007)

Jerry Peck
11-17-2009, 05:54 PM
If the discharge pipe is trapped, provisions shall be made to drain the low point of the trapped portion of the discharge pipe.
(Effective January 1, 2007)



Rick,

My reading of that does not allow a valve there, it requires "provisions shall be made to drain" the low point, i.e., the low point "shall" have an always open drain line attached which drains to (where?).

John Kogel
11-17-2009, 06:27 PM
Rick,

My reading of that does not allow a valve there, it requires "provisions shall be made to drain" the low point, i.e., the low point "shall" have an always open drain line attached which drains to (where?).Well then it would not be a trap, it would be a drain with a redundant extension going back up. :confused:
Come to think of it, a trap doesn't need a drain, a trap is designed to trap water. They might have said it needs to be provided with a cleanout, but ...... That whole rule seems rediculous. What are they thinking?

John Dirks Jr
11-17-2009, 06:39 PM
Is that valve actually capable of cutting off flow of a TPR discharge? I'm not sure it is. I know it's wrong but the type of valve and its location doesnt look like it would block the discharge. I could be wrong.

Matthew Barnicle
11-17-2009, 07:33 PM
I don't think the manufacturer allows them to be trapped and the manufacturer specs should override the code.

Cobra Cook
11-18-2009, 09:18 AM
The valve shown is only for draining from pop off?, looks like serves no other function, maybe they wanted to check the pop off for leaking, as the main line may go to where it could not be monitored. Other than that It does not affect or restrict the the pop off main line.

John Kogel
11-18-2009, 06:43 PM
The valve shown is only for draining from pop off?, looks like serves no other function, maybe they wanted to check the pop off for leaking, as the main line may go to where it could not be monitored. Other than that It does not affect or restrict the the pop off main line.Most people will agree that the discharge line should just go down, straight down if possible, as called for by the manufacturers. There is no need to route the pipe upwards, even in a basement. Put a pan under it if you like. The rule was written by a clueless bureaucrat and really should have been scrapped instead of amended. JMO.