Steven Turetsky
08-24-2010, 07:40 PM
Maybe this isn't exacly inspecting, unless you want to consider it inspecting before it's done, rather than after.
I'm getting ready to install the heating/hot water system(s) in a house I've been building for the past few years.
I have a new (left over from a previous job) Weil-McLain CGI-5 for the heat, which consists of radiant heat in the slab, and baseboards throughout the remainder of the house. (except the bathroom will also be rediant heat beneath the floor.)
I also just purchased a Rinnai R75LSi for the domestic water.
My reason for the on demand as compared to a water storage tank is space limitations, I like the idea of shutting down the boiler in the summer, and not keeping 50 gallons hot 24/7.
When discussing the installation with Rinnai, they told me this unit had the capacity to heat the house too. I love the idea of more space saving, but don't feel comfortable with using the system for dual purpose.
My reasons are that;
1. Because the boiler will be shutdown in the summer, and the on demand will only fire up when called upon, it will be a savings.
2. Since there is no water storage like in a boiler's heat exchanger, and there is no cast iron heat exchanger to hold the heat while the system still circulates without firing, I feel the on demand system will have to constantly fire every moment the thermostat calls for heat.
By the way, Rinnai tells me that although that might be so, there is another factor to consider; the system will not have to work to heat the heat exchanger and additional water it holds hot.
I checked the efficiency of both units, they are about the same.
Like I said, I love saving the space, but the thought of the on demand always firing up, rattles me.
Any thoughts?
I'm getting ready to install the heating/hot water system(s) in a house I've been building for the past few years.
I have a new (left over from a previous job) Weil-McLain CGI-5 for the heat, which consists of radiant heat in the slab, and baseboards throughout the remainder of the house. (except the bathroom will also be rediant heat beneath the floor.)
I also just purchased a Rinnai R75LSi for the domestic water.
My reason for the on demand as compared to a water storage tank is space limitations, I like the idea of shutting down the boiler in the summer, and not keeping 50 gallons hot 24/7.
When discussing the installation with Rinnai, they told me this unit had the capacity to heat the house too. I love the idea of more space saving, but don't feel comfortable with using the system for dual purpose.
My reasons are that;
1. Because the boiler will be shutdown in the summer, and the on demand will only fire up when called upon, it will be a savings.
2. Since there is no water storage like in a boiler's heat exchanger, and there is no cast iron heat exchanger to hold the heat while the system still circulates without firing, I feel the on demand system will have to constantly fire every moment the thermostat calls for heat.
By the way, Rinnai tells me that although that might be so, there is another factor to consider; the system will not have to work to heat the heat exchanger and additional water it holds hot.
I checked the efficiency of both units, they are about the same.
Like I said, I love saving the space, but the thought of the on demand always firing up, rattles me.
Any thoughts?