PDA

View Full Version : Owner Builder....LOL



Jacqueline Keenan
11-04-2015, 05:32 PM
Hi,
I'm Jacquie. I found you all on Google. I needed to know if my new Bosch Dishwasher needed an airgap on the counter. So happy I don't have to have another hole cut into the Quartz. It will look much cleaner.
Thanks for your help!!!

Scott Patterson
11-04-2015, 07:39 PM
Hi,
I'm Jacquie. I found you all on Google. I needed to know if my new Bosch Dishwasher needed an airgap on the counter. So happy I don't have to have another hole cut into the Quartz. It will look much cleaner.
Thanks for your help!!!

It depends on the area you live in. Being in California the chances are pretty good that it is required in your area… Many things are required in CA that are not required in any other state or even Mars! :D

Bill Bryan
11-04-2015, 08:30 PM
Bad news....looks like you have to fire up the hole saw. Not only do we want an air gap but, we want also want to see it on the countertop. Rumor has it....Mars only requires a "high loop!"

I'm sure your new Bosch has internal check valves and a high loop over the top of the dishwasher...we still need to see an air gap on the countertop.

If it's any consolation, the air gap is more reliable than a high loop or a check valve.

before you drill..check local codes....cities have been known to have different interpretations...

Ian Page
11-04-2015, 10:44 PM
Hi,
I'm Jacquie. I found you all on Google. I needed to know if my new Bosch Dishwasher needed an airgap on the counter. So happy I don't have to have another hole cut into the Quartz. It will look much cleaner.
Thanks for your help!!!

Jacqueline

I live in Ca. - n. San Diego and recently installed an island quartz countertop, with new dishwasher and faucet and did not install a counter air gap. I too prefer the cleaner look without it. I did, however install an air admittance valve ($10 from Home Depot) under the sink and also 'high looped' the dw discharge line, which connects to the garbage disposer.

I'm not expecting the local code enforcement police to come knocking on my door anytime soon, even though it is a local requirement to install the air gap. Should I sell my house and it becomes an issue with the buyer, I'll explain my decision and, if they still want the air gap installed, that's the time to get the hole cut. In the meantime I'll live without the air gap, preferring to keep the cleaner line of the Quartz. It's not a big deal to cut the hole and any back-up in the waste line would be exposed at the garbage disposer anyway. If I were buying, I know what I would choose.

Many new dishwashers have a check- valve pre-installed which prevents discharged water flowing back into the unit basically making the counter air gap redundant, providing discharge is made into the garbage disposer - which, it itself becomes an air-gap if left unsealed, as they frequently are.

The choice is yours, install or not as long as you understand possible ramifications of not doing so. The air-gap is a safety device to provide venting and alert you to waste back-up but everything will work just fine without one, especially if directly connected to the disposer.

Garry Sorrells
11-05-2015, 08:41 AM
Jacquie,
If you go that rout, look for one that meets:


- ASSE 1050 & 1051
- ICC ESR-1664

- NSF Standard 14

- IAPMO – Classified Mark

- ASTM D 2665/D 2661

Not the $5.99 cheater in black

Tim de Vries
11-14-2015, 12:19 AM
Hi Jacquie,

Call your local inspectors who will be covering plumbing and building. Ask who's inspection supersedes, if any, and ask them what they will accept. If you call them and treat them with respect they are usually more than happy in an owner/builder situation to tell you what they will accept. It's saved me much grief doing the same thing and though the codes are different in Canada, people are people and often want to be involved and help out, especially when they can.

Blessings,

Tim

Gunnar Alquist
11-14-2015, 09:40 AM
The most apparent thing that I noticed was my Bosch dishwasher was much quieter before I installed the airgap. A fair amount of noise comes out of the airgap when the dishwasher is draining.

Frazier Jeffery
11-14-2015, 12:32 PM
Hi,
I'm Jacquie. I found you all on Google. I needed to know if my new Bosch Dishwasher needed an airgap on the counter. So happy I don't have to have another hole cut into the Quartz. It will look much cleaner.
Thanks for your help!!!
No don't bother just fasten the dishwasher houe high up to the very bottom of the underside of the counter. This is known as a Hi Loop method and regardless of the plumbing code jurisdiction works just fine and you don't need a permit anyway

Bob R
02-02-2016, 08:12 AM
No don't bother just fasten the dishwasher houe high up to the very bottom of the underside of the counter. This is known as a Hi Loop method and regardless of the plumbing code jurisdiction works just fine and you don't need a permit anyway
The above suggestion may be fine now... but if you sell, the buyers HI may call it out and you will be doing it then.

Jerry Peck
02-02-2016, 08:55 AM
The above suggestion may be fine now... but if you sell, the buyers HI may call it out and you will be doing it then.

Only if the code requires an air gap, many codes only require an air gap or ... that "or" is crucial ... or per the manufacturer's installation instructions, and most (if not all) manufacturers allow the high loop.

In California, where the original poster is, an air gap is required - but people outside California read these posts so I am just clarifying the " ... but if you sell, the buyers HI may call it out and you will be doing it then." statement is a "depends" statement ... as in 'it depends' on where you live and what the code in your area says.

Ian Page
02-02-2016, 12:36 PM
Only if the code requires an air gap, many codes only require an air gap or ... that "or" is crucial ... or per the manufacturer's installation instructions, and most (if not all) manufacturers allow the high loop.

In California, where the original poster is, an air gap is required - but people outside California read these posts so I am just clarifying the " ... but if you sell, the buyers HI may call it out and you will be doing it then." statement is a "depends" statement ... as in 'it depends' on where you live and what the code in your area says.

Yep, Jerry. It also depends on what the buyer is willing to accept - especially in this instance where a cosmetic 'look' may be more important to them than code requirement or functionality.

Bob R
02-02-2016, 12:44 PM
Only if the code requires an air gap, many codes only require an air gap or ... that "or" is crucial ... or per the manufacturer's installation instructions, and most (if not all) manufacturers allow the high loop.

In California, where the original poster is, an air gap is required - but people outside California read these posts so I am just clarifying the " ... but if you sell, the buyers HI may call it out and you will be doing it then." statement is a "depends" statement ... as in 'it depends' on where you live and what the code in your area says.

Yes... Let me qualify what I meant. Check the code. Even the city may have their own code that supersedes the national code, such as Davis, Ca. If it is required by all means comply because it will become an issue later. Davis, Ca. performs "city inspections" on EVERY home that transfers owners.

Ian Page
02-02-2016, 03:51 PM
Yes... Let me qualify what I meant. Check the code. Even the city may have their own code that supersedes the national code, such as Davis, Ca. If it is required by all means comply because it will become an issue later. Davis, Ca. performs "city inspections" on EVERY home that transfers owners.

Bob, where did you get that information from about Davis, CA performing 'city Inspections'? Now they might do a drive-by to verify the property exists but there is nothing that I can find in their local ordinance or municipal code which gives any authority to any staff member to enter the property unless exergent circumstances exist, have a warrant or are requested / permitted by the owner. Y

Code enforcement personnel (nonpolice) basically only respond when a complaint is made. Building permit staff simply wouldn't have the time to arbitrarily visit every property sold to establish code compliance of every aspect of every code. Your assertion triggers all sorts of search and seizure issues.

Jerry Peck
02-02-2016, 04:08 PM
Bob, where did you get that information from about Davis, CA performing 'city Inspections'? Now they might do a drive-by to verify the property exists but there is nothing that I can find in their local ordinance or municipal code which gives any authority to any staff member to enter the property unless exergent circumstances exist, have a warrant or are requested / permitted by the owner. Y

Code enforcement personnel (nonpolice) basically only respond when a complaint is made. Building permit staff simply wouldn't have the time to arbitrarily visit every property sold to establish code compliance of every aspect of every code. Your assertion triggers all sorts of search and seizure issues.

Ian,

I'm not sure about Davis, CA, but I know that there used to be many cities which have (at least had at that time) ordinances which required a 'city inspection' when a property was listed for lease, rent, or sale. It was a nominal inspection for life-safety issues, those inspections didn't really 'address code issues' but they did address life-safety issues and would point out other serious 'code issues' during their inspection.

Those inspections did not trigger any search and seizure issues as those inspections were only triggered when the property was offered for lease, rent, of sale and (essentially) 'the public' was being invited in ... the inspection was for the protection of 'the public'.

I know some areas outside St. Louis used to have those inspections, and I've heard of them being required in other areas.

- - - Updated - - -

I did a quick Google search and found these:
- http://cityofdavis.org/home/showdocument?id=472
- City of Davis, CA : Resale Program (http://cityofdavis.org/city-hall/community-development-and-sustainability/building/resale-program)

Roy Lewis
02-02-2016, 05:12 PM
New washer don't need it.
Wash your dishes babe and move on.

Ian Page
02-02-2016, 05:12 PM
Wow...Jerry, thank you for the research. I must admit I didn't spend a whole lot of time searching...didn't have it to spend. I am truly stunned that this kind of intrusive (IMO) inspection exists. I understand the meaning and desire he City of Davis has to protect its citizens but I am amazed that his hasn't been challenged and removed. Though I suspect it is money-maker for the AHJ. Times have changed since 1976.

I am anxious to hear from any Davis Home Inspector has to the impact this ordinance has on their business - sure would be a damper in many areas

Bob, my apologies...

Jerry Peck
02-02-2016, 05:32 PM
Wow...Jerry, thank you for the research. I must admit I didn't spend a whole lot of time searching...didn't have it to spend. I am truly stunned that this kind of intrusive (IMO) inspection exists. I understand the meaning and desire he City of Davis has to protect its citizens but I am amazed that his hasn't been challenged and removed. Though I suspect it is money-maker for the AHJ. Times have changed since 1976.

I am anxious to hear from any Davis Home Inspector has to the impact this ordinance has on their business - sure would be a damper in many areas

Bob, my apologies...

Ian,

When you think about who you are inviting in when you list a house ... you are opening your house to the world, which includes on-duty/off-duty building inspectors/police/criminals/you-name-it, and you are inviting them into your house to 'look around'.

It's not like there is any expectation of privacy - you opened the door when you listed the house.

I doubt there is a court anywhere in the land who would find it intrusive for anyone you invited in to come in and look around to, well, come in and look around. And if you did something unsafe (such as converted a dark hole of a room in the basement as a bedroom) you should expect anyone you invited in to find it and see it. From there it's a wide open field day.

I guess it gets back to one of those stupid things we've been discussing here - someone who has converted a dark hole of a room in the basement into a bedroom and then invites the world in to look around ... can likely be found in the dictionary showing their photo at the definition of stupid - to show what stupid looks like. :)

Ian Page
02-02-2016, 05:52 PM
Well Jerry...not really, maybe, yes and no.
courts have long held that governmental access has a much higher threshold to establish than the general public does. The government is there for enforcement purposes of some description, John Q Public is not. Secondly, a house for sale does not have to be listed - thereby removing the public having access aspect. Third, open houses are for a limited time, for a specific purpose and the owner/ agent can impose limitations without legal reprisal. Fourth, a house can and often are, listed for sale by appointment only - thus removing any public access.

i still think it's a matter of government overstepping, which I would challenge if I was selling in Davis

Jerry Peck
02-02-2016, 06:19 PM
i still think it's a matter of government overstepping, which I would challenge if I was selling in Davis

I think that is anyone has a problem with having the inspection made on a house which is listed, likely has something to hide.

I agree that not all houses are listed, and that could create an 'out' for what I am describing, nonetheless, though, if someone is selling a house which has not been illegally converted or some other major thing done which should not have been done, 'the government' is simply protecting 'the public' and there should not be anything to worry about.

In my opinion, the courts have gone way to far in some cases, and a case in point that I am all too familiar with (having lived in South Florida for 20 years before moving to the Daytona Beach area (few know where Ormond Beach is) is this: voting ballots are required to be in Spanish as well as English.

That is correct.

When a person attains US citizenship, they acknowledge and attest that they can read, write, and speak English and will follow the constitution, etc., blah, blah, blah.

Only US citizens are permitted to vote.

Therefore, any person voting has already attested that they can read, write, and speak English - so why does a ballot need to be in Spanish too?

Frazier Jeffery
02-02-2016, 07:45 PM
Only if the code requires an air gap, many codes only require an air gap or ... that "or" is crucial ... or per the manufacturer's installation instructions, and most (if not all) manufacturers allow the high loop.

In California, where the original poster is, an air gap is required - but people outside California read these posts so I am just clarifying the " ... but if you sell, the buyers HI may call it out and you will be doing it then." statement is a "depends" statement ... as in 'it depends' on where you live and what the code in your area says.
Actually like most worthless ideas that seem to be unique to California "things" work just fine but need an added bureaucratic California finishing touch. The principal of physics does not change state to state. A perfect example is the requirement that sprinkler systems be installed inside residential dwellings. SOOOO have a fire then saturate the house with water damage. BRIGHT

Jerry Peck
02-02-2016, 08:15 PM
SOOOO have a fire then saturate the house with water damage. BRIGHT

You may get out soaking wet, but at least you get out.

The fire sprinkler is not there to 'save the house', the fire sprinkler is there to 'allow the occupants to get out alive'.

Insurance companies are in a conundrum over fire sprinklers:
a) Fire sprinklers save lives and, as a side benefit, keep the houses from burning to the ground - save the insurance company money on the structure and the people's lives.
b) Fire sprinklers do a lot of water damage when a fire is contained quickly enough - costs the insurance company a lot of extra money (but would you really rather have the house burn down and kill the occupants to save that money?).

My point of view is from having been in construction (I am a GC), having done home inspections, and having done AHJ code inspections (I am a code inspector and plans examiner) ... one could say that I have seen both sides of the looking glass as well as having walked through the looking glass and come back through the looking glass ... that creates a different perspective.

Ian Page
02-03-2016, 12:20 AM
Five days after my son and his family moved into their $900k home, there was a small electrical fire in the garage. The offending GFCI was hidden behind a cheap pressed wood cabinet screwed to a back wall - no one knew it was there. At 2.00 a.m. all hell broke loose, alarms going off, sprinklers in the garage activated and billows of smoke filled the house. The FD arrived within minutes and blasted water everywhere. The vast majority of the damage was from water and smoke. Flames never even reached inside the home and basically only the cabinet and contents caught fire.

The family was displaced for Five months while the insurance co. wrangled. The family of five moved four or five times in the meantime. Kitchen suffered major water damage as did the furniture and personal items (clothing, bikes, scooter) all in the garage because they were in the heroes of moving in. Whole inside of house had to be painted and tons of other remedial action. Total cost - well over $100k. They moved back into the home the day before Thanksgiving with quite a lot to be thankful for.
Sorry for the thread drift but I didn't start it.

Bob R
02-03-2016, 07:56 AM
Bob, where did you get that information from about Davis, CA performing 'city Inspections'? Now they might do a drive-by to verify the property exists but there is nothing that I can find in their local ordinance or municipal code which gives any authority to any staff member to enter the property unless exergent circumstances exist, have a warrant or are requested / permitted by the owner. Y

Code enforcement personnel (nonpolice) basically only respond when a complaint is made. Building permit staff simply wouldn't have the time to arbitrarily visit every property sold to establish code compliance of every aspect of every code. Your assertion triggers all sorts of search and seizure issues.
I know this because I was there in the late 90s. The city had in-house inspectors (similar to HI's)that would schedule and perform these inspections. The sale transaction could not complete until the inspection was performed and items on the report were corrected. This was mainly to keep slum lords under control. It was not uncommon for a property owner to convert a two car garage into 4 bedrooms to charge higher rent. I guess it's possible they don't do that any longer, but I doubt it.

Mark Reinmiller
02-03-2016, 09:52 AM
Actually like most worthless ideas that seem to be unique to California "things" work just fine but need an added bureaucratic California finishing touch. The principal of physics does not change state to state. A perfect example is the requirement that sprinkler systems be installed inside residential dwellings. SOOOO have a fire then saturate the house with water damage. BRIGHT

Studies show that sprinkler systems put out fire with hundreds of gallons of water, and there has been virtually no loss of life in houses with sprinklers. Fire companies put out fires with thousands of gallons of water. Fire reach flashover conditions far faster than they used to in houses. Often times by the time the fire company gets there the house is a complete loss.

Sorry for continuing the thread drift.

Raymond Wand
02-03-2016, 04:00 PM
Good points Mark,

In addition they reduce smoke damage, and water damage, contain the fire, and also help firefighters. Insurers also provide premium savings.

Jerry Peck
02-03-2016, 07:48 PM
Five days after my son and his family moved into their $900k home, there was a small electrical fire in the garage. The offending GFCI was hidden behind a cheap pressed wood cabinet screwed to a back wall - no one knew it was there. At 2.00 a.m. all hell broke loose, alarms going off, sprinklers in the garage activated and billows of smoke filled the house. The FD arrived within minutes and blasted water everywhere. The vast majority of the damage was from water and smoke. Flames never even reached inside the home and basically only the cabinet and contents caught fire.

The family was displaced for Five months while the insurance co. wrangled. The family of five moved four or five times in the meantime. Kitchen suffered major water damage as did the furniture and personal items (clothing, bikes, scooter) all in the garage because they were in the heroes of moving in. Whole inside of house had to be painted and tons of other remedial action. Total cost - well over $100k. They moved back into the home the day before Thanksgiving with quite a lot to be thankful for.
Sorry for the thread drift but I didn't start it.

My neighbor across the street bought a house two blocks away for his mother to live in, the closed on a Wednesday, started moving in on that Thursday, and that Friday afternoon a tree fell through the roof ... does that mean we need to cut all the trees down? Saturday morning the tree was removed and the roof repaired.

Waiting 5 months because of insurance haggling has nothing to do with fire sprinklers and saving lives, that has to do with greed and refusing to address claims in a timely manner - should the insurance agents be lined up and shot for failing to do their duty?

Frazier Jeffery
02-03-2016, 09:11 PM
My neighbor across the street bought a house two blocks away for his mother to live in, the closed on a Wednesday, started moving in on that Thursday, and that Friday afternoon a tree fell through the roof ... does that mean we need to cut all the trees down? Saturday morning the tree was removed and the roof repaired.

Waiting 5 months because of insurance haggling has nothing to do with fire sprinklers and saving lives, that has to do with greed and refusing to address claims in a timely manner - should the insurance agents be lined up and shot for failing to do their duty?

Reply
I still believe that putting sprinklers inside a single family residence will prove to be a mistake. Smoke alarms should adequately alert occupants to evacuate People die more often from smoke inhalation and to remain in a dwelling long enough for the sprinkler system to activate defies practical logic I seriously question if the sprinkler requirements were not predicated for personal financial gains from the bureaucrats initiating the requirements

- - - Updated - - -


My neighbor across the street bought a house two blocks away for his mother to live in, the closed on a Wednesday, started moving in on that Thursday, and that Friday afternoon a tree fell through the roof ... does that mean we need to cut all the trees down? Saturday morning the tree was removed and the roof repaired.

Waiting 5 months because of insurance haggling has nothing to do with fire sprinklers and saving lives, that has to do with greed and refusing to address claims in a timely manner - should the insurance agents be lined up and shot for failing to do their duty?

Reply
I still believe that putting sprinklers inside a single family residence will prove to be a mistake. Smoke alarms should adequately alert occupants to evacuate People die more often from smoke inhalation and to remain in a dwelling long enough for the sprinkler system to activate defies practical logic I seriously question if the sprinkler requirements were not predicated for personal financial gains from the bureaucrats initiating the requirements

- - - Updated - - -


My neighbor across the street bought a house two blocks away for his mother to live in, the closed on a Wednesday, started moving in on that Thursday, and that Friday afternoon a tree fell through the roof ... does that mean we need to cut all the trees down? Saturday morning the tree was removed and the roof repaired.

Waiting 5 months because of insurance haggling has nothing to do with fire sprinklers and saving lives, that has to do with greed and refusing to address claims in a timely manner - should the insurance agents be lined up and shot for failing to do their duty?

Reply
I still believe that putting sprinklers inside a single family residence will prove to be a mistake. Smoke alarms should adequately alert occupants to evacuate People die more often from smoke inhalation and to remain in a dwelling long enough for the sprinkler system to activate defies practical logic I seriously question if the sprinkler requirements were not predicated for personal financial gains from the bureaucrats initiating the requirements

Ian Page
02-03-2016, 11:24 PM
I certainly see the value of the sprinkler system, as in my son's case. The sprinklers were in the garage with three bedrooms directly above. The family was alerted to the fire by smoke alarms sounding. My son had smelled an acrid odor a couple of hours earlier, went to investigate, checked the whole house, including garage, found nothing - because the burning was hidden behind the cabinet and went to bed. He put the smell down to something outside the home.

Seems the vast majority of the damage was actually caused by the responding FDs hoses and garage sprinklers. Undoubtedly the kids, who were sleeping directly above, were saved by the smoke alarms sounding which were linked in series. Everyone was out of the house by the time the FD arrived by which time the whole house was filled with smoke and the cabinet fully ablaze.

The delay in settlement and remedial action was primarily caused by having 3 different adjusters, a salvage/restoration crew who used a variety of sub-contractors and in co-ordinating the different trades involved. Of course the Insurance co. had to get approval 'up the ladder' each time a quote was presented and whenever work was completed. Some of the contractors wanted some funds up front to start the job and the insurance would only pay out if and when the work was completed. In fact my son still hasn't received some items - clothing and drapery which had to be sent for cleaning. The cleaning co. is refusing to return it until they are paid and the Ins. co insists they already have been.

Sorry for the thread drift continuance...