Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. #1
    David Banks's Avatar
    David Banks Guest

    Default MA Standards of Practice

    MA just revised the Standards of Practice. This must now be embedded in the report. Some good things some not. Last page is prohibitions. Can no longer operate sump pump or humidifiers. Not required to inspect detached garages. I like 6.01 Access. "The client shall provide safe access and sufficient lighting to ensure that all systems and areas to be inspected under this standard are readily Accessible and Observable"
    Yea Right!

    Rules and Regulations Governing Home Inspectors - Office of Consumer Affairs and Business Regulation

    Similar Threads:
    OREP Insurance

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Philadelphia PA
    Posts
    3,177

    Default Re: MA Standards of Practice

    Quote Originally Posted by David Banks View Post
    "The client shall provide safe access and sufficient lighting to ensure that all systems and areas to be inspected under this standard are readily Accessible and Observable"
    The client?!


  3. #3
    David Banks's Avatar
    David Banks Guest

    Default Re: MA Standards of Practice

    Yea. That was in the old standards also. I guess there suppose to go over there the day before and knock on the door and string some lights etc


  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    South-West Michigan
    Posts
    469

    Thumbs down Re: MA Standards of Practice

    Not allowed to operate sump pumps???

    Randall Aldering GHI BAOM MSM
    Housesmithe Inspection
    www.housesmithe.com

  5. #5
    David Banks's Avatar
    David Banks Guest

    Default Re: MA Standards of Practice

    Quote Originally Posted by Randy Aldering View Post
    Not allowed to operate sump pumps???
    Yea. None of us can figure out that one.


  6. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    South-West Michigan
    Posts
    469

    Exclamation Re: MA Standards of Practice

    Figure it this way: if the sump pump doesn't work, there may be a problem with basement flooding. Suppose the sump pump is tested, and it doesn't work. Then the buyer hires a home inspector who is not a real estate agent apologist. The home inspector reports the problem with the sump pump, and it becomes a negotiation issue. The pump supposedly gets fixed, but the only person who really knows is the real estate agent who acted as dual-agent in this transaction. Now suppose the real estate agent never really arranged to have the sump pump fixed. There is flooding in the basement, and a lawsuit ensues. Now, would it be better if the sump pump were never tested? Better yet, could an attorney make a case against a home inspector who did not test a sump pump?

    Randall Aldering GHI BAOM MSM
    Housesmithe Inspection
    www.housesmithe.com

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Georgetown, KY
    Posts
    538

    Default Re: MA Standards of Practice

    I can see it not being required, but prohibited!

    Ah well, minimalists are out there.

    Erby Crofutt, Georgetown, KY - Read my Blog here: Erby the Central Kentucky Home Inspector B4 U Close Home Inspections www.b4uclose.com www.kentuckyradon.com
    Find on Facebook at: https://www.facebook.com/B4UCloseInspections

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Spring Hill (Nashville), TN
    Posts
    5,851

    Default Re: MA Standards of Practice

    Quote Originally Posted by Erby Crofutt View Post
    I can see it not being required, but prohibited!

    Ah well, minimalists are out there.

    Uhummm, and this is from a person who is in a state that can not tell their client that an FPE panel is a POS and needs to be replaced!

    Scott Patterson, ACI
    Spring Hill, TN
    www.traceinspections.com

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •