|
|
|
Welcome to the InspectionNews - Home Inspection forums.
You are currently viewing InspectionNews as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions but not pictures. There are over 6,300 inspectors who have already joined. By joining InspectionNews you will be able to see the pictures, have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast and simple so please, join InspectionNews today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.
Why join InspectionNews? Read the Testimonials
|
|

06-22-2007, 04:04 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: gone
Posts: 245
|
|
|
Beam
..........
Last edited by Jeff Eastman : 12-20-2007 at 08:10 AM.
|
|

06-22-2007, 06:26 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 672
|
|
|
Re: Beam
The tip of a 16 foot beam, appears cut at 45 degrees, is supporting a 2x6 laying flat. This is wrong correct?
I can't make heads nor tails of this.
Which is the 16' beam? The member coming in from the left or the other one?
How is the beam cut at 45°? Is the bottom of the beam shorter than the top. Top shorter than the bottom? One side shorter than the other?
You say the beam is supporting a 2X6. (Perhaps you meant to say the beam is supported by a 2X6.) Which member is the 2X6? Is it the member laid flat below what may be the beam? Or is it the vertical member with the large knot?
Allow portions of the beam should be contacting the 2x6.
Allow what? I don't understand that.
To answer what I think you are asking . . . the beam must have proper end support of at least 1 1/2" across its width. I'm not sure which member above the 2X laid flat is the beam in question but it is not properly supported (whichever one it is).
__________________
"Baseball is like church. Many attend but few understand." Leo Durocher
Bruce Breedlove
www.avaloninspection.com
|
|

06-22-2007, 06:44 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 726
|
|
|
Re: Beam
is that a valley?
|
|

06-22-2007, 08:59 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 1,449
|
|
|
Re: Beam
Bruce, I think the word "beam" is what is throwing you off.
I THINK the vertical brace which is contacting the horizontal 2x that is totally in the picture frame is where the questions come in.
Poor workmanship in any case.
Jim
__________________
Jim Luttrall
Mr. Inspector.net, Inc.
Allen, Texas 75002
|
|

06-22-2007, 10:17 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Duncanville, Tx
Posts: 1,086
|
|
|
Re: Beam
I must have adult ADD...
I'm reading Jim's post to this thread and I'm also reading the word "Beam". The next thing that comes to mind is Jim Beam-- and I don't drink anymore (or less) either.
Rich
__________________
"If con is the opposite of pro, is Congress the opposite of progress?"
Richard Rushing, HCRI
Duncanville, Tx.
|
|

06-23-2007, 12:19 AM
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 672
|
|
|
Re: Beam
I think you're right. I took "beam" to mean a "beam", not a "post". Foolish me!
beam - one of the principal horizontal supporting members of a building
post - a vertical structural member
Jeff, I'm not trying to beat you up here but if we have interpreted this correctly it would behoove you to brush up on the technical terms for basic structural components. (Just so you know, I have plenty of room for improvement in many areas myself.)
__________________
"Baseball is like church. Many attend but few understand." Leo Durocher
Bruce Breedlove
www.avaloninspection.com
|
|

06-23-2007, 07:12 AM
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Duncanville, Tx
Posts: 1,086
|
|
|
Re: Beam
No. Not an SE...
I would write as "In Need of Repair" by a experienced/ qualified framing contractor.
SE, in my opinion, is an over-kill.
RR
__________________
"If con is the opposite of pro, is Congress the opposite of progress?"
Richard Rushing, HCRI
Duncanville, Tx.
|
|

06-23-2007, 07:41 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Ormond Beach, Florida
Posts: 6,639
|
|
|
Re: Beam
Originally Posted by Richard Rushing
No. Not an SE...
I would write as "In Need of Repair" by a experienced/ qualified framing contractor.
SE, in my opinion, is an over-kill.
RR
I agree.
Even a semi-experienced framing contractor should be able to figure that out and make a suitable repair.
|
|

06-23-2007, 12:12 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 74
|
|
|
Re: Beam
What the heck is going on in that pic??? I really cannot tell.
Anyway, please correct me if I'm wrong here by any 2x lumber should not be considered a "post" and should not be bearing any significant load. I believe 4x lumber is the minimum demension that can have the name "post".
If that is a bearing member, I don't think a 2x6 is going to cut it.
|
|

06-23-2007, 12:25 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Ormond Beach, Florida
Posts: 6,639
|
|
|
Re: Beam
Originally Posted by Martin lehman
If that is a bearing member, I don't think a 2x6 is going to cut it.
It looks like a 2x6 with a 2x4 "T" brace on it (could even be a 2x6 brace, but I think it's a 2x4).
They are remarkably strong that way.
The 2x6 does not flex in its width dimension very much, and the 2x4 does not flex in its width very much, add the two at two planes and there will not be much flex in either plane. Compression resistance is very good because of that.
Unless, of course, you want to call in a structural engineer for that?
In South Florida, or even Ormond Beach, that would not fly ... er ... yes it would ... and that's the problem. It would all need to be strapped for uplift resistance ... so it would not fly away.
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
| Thread |
Thread Starter |
Forum |
Replies |
Last Post |
| beam interface with shingles |
John Stephenson |
Roofing System: Home Inspection and Commercial Inspection |
13 |
06-22-2007 01:38 AM |
| Porch: Post to beam |
Jeff Eastman |
Building Envelope: Home Inspection and Commercial Inspection |
4 |
06-03-2007 10:40 PM |
| Cut End on Steel I Beam |
Nick Ostrowski |
Structural Components: Home Inspection and Commercial Inspection |
3 |
05-22-2007 11:57 AM |
| Plumbing vent routed over beam in attic. |
Eric Shuman |
Plumbing System: Home Inspection and Commercial Inspection |
8 |
05-07-2007 10:25 PM |
| Nails in foundation beam |
Jeff Eastman |
Structural Components: Home Inspection and Commercial Inspection |
1 |
05-04-2007 03:05 PM |
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:33 PM.
| | |
|