InspectionNews - Home Inspection



Welcome to the InspectionNews - Home Inspection forums.

You are currently viewing InspectionNews as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions but not pictures. There are over 6,300 inspectors who have already joined. By joining InspectionNews you will be able to see the pictures, have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast and simple so please, join InspectionNews today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Why join InspectionNews? Read the Testimonials
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 06-22-2007, 04:04 PM
Jeff Eastman Jeff Eastman is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: gone
Posts: 245
Beam
..........

Last edited by Jeff Eastman : 12-20-2007 at 08:10 AM.
Reply With Quote
Home inspection
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 06-22-2007, 06:26 PM
Bruce Breedlove's Avatar
Bruce Breedlove Bruce Breedlove is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 672
Re: Beam
Quote:
The tip of a 16 foot beam, appears cut at 45 degrees, is supporting a 2x6 laying flat. This is wrong correct?
I can't make heads nor tails of this.

Which is the 16' beam? The member coming in from the left or the other one?

How is the beam cut at 45°? Is the bottom of the beam shorter than the top. Top shorter than the bottom? One side shorter than the other?

You say the beam is supporting a 2X6. (Perhaps you meant to say the beam is supported by a 2X6.) Which member is the 2X6? Is it the member laid flat below what may be the beam? Or is it the vertical member with the large knot?

Quote:
Allow portions of the beam should be contacting the 2x6.
Allow what? I don't understand that.

To answer what I think you are asking . . . the beam must have proper end support of at least 1 1/2" across its width. I'm not sure which member above the 2X laid flat is the beam in question but it is not properly supported (whichever one it is).
__________________
"Baseball is like church. Many attend but few understand." Leo Durocher
Bruce Breedlove
www.avaloninspection.com
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 06-22-2007, 06:44 PM
wayne soper's Avatar
wayne soper wayne soper is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 726
Re: Beam
is that a valley?
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 06-22-2007, 08:59 PM
Jim Luttrall Jim Luttrall is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 1,449
Re: Beam
Bruce, I think the word "beam" is what is throwing you off.
I THINK the vertical brace which is contacting the horizontal 2x that is totally in the picture frame is where the questions come in.
Poor workmanship in any case.
Jim
__________________
Jim Luttrall
Mr. Inspector.net, Inc.
Allen, Texas 75002
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 06-22-2007, 10:17 PM
Richard Rushing's Avatar
Richard Rushing Richard Rushing is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Duncanville, Tx
Posts: 1,086
Re: Beam
I must have adult ADD...

I'm reading Jim's post to this thread and I'm also reading the word "Beam". The next thing that comes to mind is Jim Beam-- and I don't drink anymore (or less) either.

Rich
__________________
"If con is the opposite of pro, is Congress the opposite of progress?"
Richard Rushing, HCRI
Duncanville, Tx.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 06-23-2007, 12:19 AM
Bruce Breedlove's Avatar
Bruce Breedlove Bruce Breedlove is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 672
Re: Beam
I think you're right. I took "beam" to mean a "beam", not a "post". Foolish me!

beam - one of the principal horizontal supporting members of a building

post - a vertical structural member

Jeff, I'm not trying to beat you up here but if we have interpreted this correctly it would behoove you to brush up on the technical terms for basic structural components. (Just so you know, I have plenty of room for improvement in many areas myself.)
__________________
"Baseball is like church. Many attend but few understand." Leo Durocher
Bruce Breedlove
www.avaloninspection.com
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 06-23-2007, 07:12 AM
Richard Rushing's Avatar
Richard Rushing Richard Rushing is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Duncanville, Tx
Posts: 1,086
Re: Beam
No. Not an SE...

I would write as "In Need of Repair" by a experienced/ qualified framing contractor.

SE, in my opinion, is an over-kill.

RR
__________________
"If con is the opposite of pro, is Congress the opposite of progress?"
Richard Rushing, HCRI
Duncanville, Tx.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 06-23-2007, 07:41 AM
Jerry Peck Jerry Peck is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Ormond Beach, Florida
Posts: 6,639
Re: Beam
Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard Rushing View Post
No. Not an SE...

I would write as "In Need of Repair" by a experienced/ qualified framing contractor.

SE, in my opinion, is an over-kill.

RR
I agree.

Even a semi-experienced framing contractor should be able to figure that out and make a suitable repair.
__________________
Jerry Peck, Construction / Litigation Consultant
Construction Litigation Consultants, LLC ( www.ConstructionLitigationConsultants.com )
EastWestData (www.EastWestData.com )
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 06-23-2007, 12:12 PM
Martin lehman's Avatar
Martin lehman Martin lehman is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 74
Re: Beam
What the heck is going on in that pic??? I really cannot tell.
Anyway, please correct me if I'm wrong here by any 2x lumber should not be considered a "post" and should not be bearing any significant load. I believe 4x lumber is the minimum demension that can have the name "post".
If that is a bearing member, I don't think a 2x6 is going to cut it.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 06-23-2007, 12:25 PM
Jerry Peck Jerry Peck is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Ormond Beach, Florida
Posts: 6,639
Re: Beam
Quote:
Originally Posted by Martin lehman View Post
If that is a bearing member, I don't think a 2x6 is going to cut it.
It looks like a 2x6 with a 2x4 "T" brace on it (could even be a 2x6 brace, but I think it's a 2x4).

They are remarkably strong that way.

The 2x6 does not flex in its width dimension very much, and the 2x4 does not flex in its width very much, add the two at two planes and there will not be much flex in either plane. Compression resistance is very good because of that.

Unless, of course, you want to call in a structural engineer for that?

In South Florida, or even Ormond Beach, that would not fly ... er ... yes it would ... and that's the problem. It would all need to be strapped for uplift resistance ... so it would not fly away.
__________________
Jerry Peck, Construction / Litigation Consultant
Construction Litigation Consultants, LLC ( www.ConstructionLitigationConsultants.com )
EastWestData (www.EastWestData.com )
Reply With Quote
Are inspection referrals from past clients important to you? If so, click here to get even more referrals!
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
beam interface with shingles John Stephenson Roofing System: Home Inspection and Commercial Inspection 13 06-22-2007 01:38 AM
Porch: Post to beam Jeff Eastman Building Envelope: Home Inspection and Commercial Inspection 4 06-03-2007 10:40 PM
Cut End on Steel I Beam Nick Ostrowski Structural Components: Home Inspection and Commercial Inspection 3 05-22-2007 11:57 AM
Plumbing vent routed over beam in attic. Eric Shuman Plumbing System: Home Inspection and Commercial Inspection 8 05-07-2007 10:25 PM
Nails in foundation beam Jeff Eastman Structural Components: Home Inspection and Commercial Inspection 1 05-04-2007 03:05 PM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:33 PM.


Design by Vjacheslav Trushkin.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8
vB.Sponsors
All Rights Reserved. Hann Tech Marketing Link / InspectionNews.com / InspectionNews.net - No part of InspectionNews.net may be reproduced in any way, or by any means, without the prior written permission of InspectionNews.net. Use of any index or listing Software for the purpose of constructing a mailing list, creating promotional materials or producing a printed or electronic catalog of any kind is expressly forbidden without the prior written permission of InspectionNews.net - All text, graphics and design on InspectionNews.net is copyright by Hann Tech Marketing Links.
Ad Management by RedTyger