Results 1 to 11 of 11
  1. #1
    Scott Medlin's Avatar
    Scott Medlin Guest

    Default T-111 siding problems

    Hello friends,

    I found this wood siding damage on an inspection today. I commonly see water wicking up at the bottom of wood siding causing damage, but this seems pretty extreme. The grading away from the wall seems o.k. but their are no rain gutters above. The house was built in 1983. Am I right in identifieing it as T-111? Have any of you more experienced folks seen damage this extensive on siding that has good clearance from the ground as this does? Thanks in advance.

    Similar Threads:
    ***IMPORTANT*** You Need To Register To View Images ***IMPORTANT*** You Need To Register To View Images
    Member Benefits1

  2. #2
    Nolan Kienitz's Avatar
    Nolan Kienitz Guest

    Default Re: T-111 siding problems

    Scott,

    All the time. Composition siding is what I use to refer to such.

    I keep away from "brand names". There used to be some class actions suits regarding product, but all have run out as best I'm aware.

    Develop a statement that provides an explanation of the product (brand names notwithstanding) to help educate your client.

    Checkboxes in reports don't do much to aid your client in learning more.


  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Rockwall Texas
    Posts
    4,521

    Default Re: T-111 siding problems

    I'm surprised they just didn't mount the 1x12 trim board across the damages and caulk it up like you'll see at siding as such.

    Rain water run-off from the roof probably the culprit for all that damage.

    rick


  4. #4
    Richard Moore's Avatar
    Richard Moore Guest

    Default Re: T-111 siding problems

    It looks more like some type of Masonite product than what I would typically consider to be "T1-11", so I'd also go with "Composition siding".

    I don't think clearance from the ground is the issue here. In the 3rd photo, in particular, it looks like the siding is sitting on top of the concrete rather than overlapping it. Water running down the siding is getting trapped at that joint and wicking back into the siding (It's a sure bet they didn't bother to seal the lower edges).

    If I was a buyer, I'd want the siding ripped off and the underlying structure checked for damage before I re-negotiated and closed the deal.


  5. #5
    Scott Medlin's Avatar
    Scott Medlin Guest

    Default Re: T-111 siding problems

    Hi Nolan, that's good information. I'll definitely word it as "composition siding" in the report (and future reports). The T-111 question was more to satisfy my personal curiosity. I can see the wisdom of avoiding the use of namebrands in the report. Thanks for the quick reply! Much appreciated.


  6. #6
    Scott Medlin's Avatar
    Scott Medlin Guest

    Default Re: T-111 siding problems

    Hey Richard, hey Rick. Thanks for the info. This place is a foreclosure and the buyer is taking it on as an investment property. I'll be sure to pass on concerns about possible framing damage/rot. Thanks again.


  7. #7
    Richard Rushing's Avatar
    Richard Rushing Guest

    Default Re: T-111 siding problems

    I too go with hardbaord siding. Life expectancy of this product should be around 12-15 years. After that, is what you see in the making.

    I always recommend the lower course (as it shows the worst) of hardboard siding be removed for replacement. Now, once you remove the lower course, you won't be able to re-match the color and pattern (usually) so you will have to replace the entire covered sections.

    rr


  8. #8
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Spring Hill (Nashville), TN
    Posts
    5,851

    Default Re: T-111 siding problems

    That is not T1-11 or T-111 siding. It is a hardboard product.

    Scott Patterson, ACI
    Spring Hill, TN
    www.traceinspections.com

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Fletcher, NC
    Posts
    28,042

    Default Re: T1-11 siding problems

    T1-11 is a style of plywood siding.

    That is, as others have said, "hardboard" siding.

    If you write it as being T1-11, you are indicating to your client that it is "plywood", which, depending on the client, either may not be a 'big deal' or may end up with them suing you stating that if you had told them that the house had "hardboard" siding they would not have purchased it and that they now want you to pay for re-siding the house.

    Depends on your clients and other things, like if they find other problems and eventually retain an attorney.

    Jerry Peck
    Construction/Litigation/Code Consultant - Retired
    www.AskCodeMan.com

  10. #10
    Nolan Kienitz's Avatar
    Nolan Kienitz Guest

    Default Re: T-111 siding problems

    Quote Originally Posted by Richard Rushing View Post
    I too go with hardbaord siding. Life expectancy of this product should be around 12-15 years. After that, is what you see in the making. rr
    My house (built in 1982) has the 'hardboard' panels at a few locations and I replaced it all around the front kitchen bay windows last spring with a Hardie product and am in the process of replacing 5 panels along a garage wall with Hardie product.

    Normal maintenance and one step at a time.


  11. #11
    Michael Greenwalt's Avatar
    Michael Greenwalt Guest

    Default Re: T-111 siding problems

    I often see the damage occuring near the bottom panels first. I attribute that to rainwater, or other water sources, splashing up from the ground. Typical homeowner, and painter, we paint what we see. As you proceed up the siding panels to where we see the bottoms of the panels, they get paint. However, down that low,,,,no paint applied, no protection,,,earlier decay. As well this stuff simply does not last forever and the most vunerable areas decay first. Now the real issue is.....what does it look like UNDER that siding where WE cannot see and the buyer is going to want us to predict? Hmmm...


Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •