Results 1 to 23 of 23
Thread: Dry rot inquiry
-
02-28-2008, 08:42 AM #1
Dry rot inquiry
Recently, I saw a wooden support beam, that was fairly new, in a basement that had seen some previous standing water. It was dry and solid again at the time of inspection. The water problem has been solved. Basically, I want to know if dry rot exists and can it continue to deteriorate wood even after it has been dry?
Similar Threads:
-
02-28-2008, 10:02 AM #2
Re: Dry rot inquiry
Dave,
Do you mean wood support column? I dont see how a beam would be affected by water on the basement floor.
-
02-28-2008, 10:37 AM #3
Re: Dry rot inquiry
If it's only been wet a few times it's likely not rotted. Generally, rot takes prolonged water/moisture contact to develop. Probing with an awl is the best way to ID something that's rotted. Basically, if 'explodes' into sawdust when you probe it or if your awl sticks in the wood, it's rot. Otherwise, nope.
Here's a picture of a rotted post for reference.
-
03-01-2008, 03:17 PM #4
Re: Dry rot inquiry
For you info.
Cheers,
Dry rot - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
-
03-29-2008, 08:06 AM #5
Re: Dry rot inquiry
Good morning, Mr. Edens:
Mr. Fellman is not quite correct. Dry-rot gets its name by virtue of the fact that the wood may still rot in spite of the fact that it is otherwise dry. The reason for this is that the organism(s) responsible for the degradation is capable of transporting its own water source to the food source (the wood).
Therefore, even dry wood can be attacked and completely degraded by the dry-rot organism, even when the wood appears dry.
I have some photos of dry-rot fungi on my web site.
Cheers!
Caoimh*n P. Connell
Forensic Industrial Hygienist
Home
(The opinions expressed here are exclusively my personal opinions and do not necessarily reflect my professional opinion, opinion of my employer, agency, peers, or professional affiliates. The above post is for information only and does not reflect professional advice and is not intended to supercede the professional advice of others.)
AMDG
-
03-29-2008, 12:41 PM #6
-
03-29-2008, 01:34 PM #7
Re: Dry rot inquiry
Its not dry rot its fungus damage. stop uesing the words dry rot. the damage is from a fungi. 4 elements of life. life being fungus. 1. water or moisture 2. food the wood. 3. air. and 4. temp. 65F to 95F
control the water or moisture and the fungus will go domant.
ID the infection prob with a pick or anything if it has a sharp crisp snap to it. its ok. If it has a soft pry-out to it. its infected with fungus.
Never use that crap copper green on or in a house it just stinks up the place. Proper treatment replace the damage materials or treat the infected condition with TIMBOR.
Best
Ron
-
03-29-2008, 03:53 PM #8
Re: Dry rot inquiry
Slightly penetrate it with your awl and try to pry a splinter from it. If you get a tapered splintery shape, it is ok (at least for now), if you break out a small chunk of it it is damaged to some extent from WDO.
-
03-29-2008, 06:48 PM #9
Re: Dry rot inquiry
Oh Ron, stop whining. You know very well that (at least in California) a home inspector is not allowed to use the words "dry rot", "fungus", "termite", "beetle" or any of those words that the Structural Pest Board has usurped and claimed as the professional domain of the wood destroying pest inspector. Might be the same story in TN.
I have started using "decayed" wood. At least until someone slaps me on the hand.
Department of Redundancy Department
Supreme Emperor of Hyperbole
http://www.FullCircleInspect.com/
-
03-29-2008, 07:19 PM #10
Re: Dry rot inquiry
-
03-29-2008, 07:44 PM #11
Re: Dry rot inquiry
JP,
I did not write "decay" or "decays", I wrote "decayed". "Decaying" is not synonymous with "decayed" in the same way that "dying" is not synonymous with "dead". "Decaying" and "dying" are a process. "Decayed" and "dead" are essentially finished with that process. As an example, Vladimir Lenin is "dead", but not decayed. Currently, his corpse is rather well preserved.
From the Mirriam-Webster online dictionary: Dictionary and Thesaurus - Merriam-Webster Online
de·cay Pronunciation: \di-ˈkā\ Function:verb Etymology:Middle English, from Anglo-French decaïr, from Late Latin decadere to fall, sink, from Latin de- + cadere to fall — more at chanceDate:15th century intransitive verb 1: to decline from a sound or prosperous condition 2: to decrease usually gradually in size, quantity, activity, or force 3: to fall into ruin 4: to decline in health, strength, or vigor 5: to undergo decomposition <decaying fruit>transitive verb 1obsolete : to cause to decay : impair <infirmity that decays the wise — Shakespeare> 2: to destroy by decomposition
— de·cay·er noun
synonyms decay, decompose, rot, putrefy, spoil mean to undergo destructive dissolution. decay implies a slow change from a state of soundness or perfection <a decaying mansion>.
Extrapolating the definition above, "decayed" would have gone through, and completed or nearly completed the process of "decay" or "decomposition". Not just dead, no longer sound or serving its intended function.
Now, the real question is: Are you going to let this rest and let me have the last word, or are you going to keep this silly discussion alive?
Department of Redundancy Department
Supreme Emperor of Hyperbole
http://www.FullCircleInspect.com/
-
03-29-2008, 07:51 PM #12
Re: Dry rot inquiry
Hey gunnar. good point on the Calif Lic# info.
As to all wood decaying. this is not true. if it has a fungus infection then it is being decayed by the fungus. but without the fungus its just wood.
Now you can have the last word. Rest in peace.
Best
Ron
-
03-29-2008, 08:06 PM #13
Re: Dry rot inquiry
WORD (variety: last)
Department of Redundancy Department
Supreme Emperor of Hyperbole
http://www.FullCircleInspect.com/
-
03-29-2008, 08:12 PM #14
Re: Dry rot inquiry
So, what you are saying is that you are looking at wood which *will not decay any further* ... ?
I doubt that is what you are saying as we all know that if you went back and checked that same wood a few years later, it would be "more decayed" that it was at first check.
Meaning your extrapolation was incorrect.
Now, the real question is: Are you going to let this rest and let me have the last word, or are you going to keep this silly discussion alive?
Oh, wait, I guess I already answered that question ... didn't I ...
-
03-29-2008, 11:12 PM #15
-
03-30-2008, 02:29 AM #16
Re: Dry rot inquiry
Good morning, All-
The mind boggles. You lot are either drunk or too sober by half! Either way, y'all are too esoteric for me. I will stick to bugs and poisons – a lot easier to understand than the wandering mind of an Home Inspector!
Cheers!
Caoimh*n P. Connell
Forensic Industrial Hygienist
Home
(The opinions expressed here are exclusively my personal opinions and do not necessarily reflect my professional opinion, opinion of my employer, agency, peers, or professional affiliates. The above post is for information only and does not reflect professional advice and is not intended to supercede the professional advice of others.)
AMDG
-
03-30-2008, 05:58 AM #17
-
03-30-2008, 01:35 PM #18
Re: Dry rot inquiry
WORD (a last attempt at last)
Department of Redundancy Department
Supreme Emperor of Hyperbole
http://www.FullCircleInspect.com/
-
03-31-2008, 07:35 AM #19
Re: Dry rot inquiry
If you go to your Doctor and he thinks you have a fugus infecton is he allowed to say that work or does he have to send you to a WDO inspector for the final report????
-
03-31-2008, 07:49 AM #20
Re: Dry rot inquiry
The mind boggles. You lot are either drunk or too sober by half! Either way, y'all are too esoteric for me. I will stick to bugs and poisons – a lot easier to understand than the wandering mind of an Home Inspector!
Expertitis (feigning knowitallism) is a common disease in this profession. But, some of them mean well . . .
Cheers,
Aaron
-
04-02-2008, 03:13 PM #21
Re: Dry rot inquiry
Caoimh*n,
Echo on Aaron's post. Personally, I'd be flattered to have you take the time to reply. Your website is a wealth of info. Thanks.
Ross
Morgan Inspection Service
Niwot CO
-
04-02-2008, 09:15 PM #22
Re: Dry rot inquiry
Hello Ross:
Thanks for taking a moment. Actually, I am flattered that HI’s are as receptive to my posts as they are. I see HI’s and Industrial Hygienists in rather the same light – which is we both need to be a competent generalists in order to keep the big picture in mind.
I greatly enjoy meeting with HI’s in the Front Range area when you guys invite me to your luncheons and dinners.
I have done a fair bit of training in the Niwot area (and Boulder Co.) for local law enforcement and they too are a good bunch.
Thanks for the hospitality.
The dry-rot issue is rather interesting, I recently had a project wherein a bogus “Environmental Scientist” did a “toxic mould” inspection on an eight building complex. Although he falsely identified multiple areas of horrible toxic moulds that were sure to kill all the occupants, steal their cars and do gawd knows what with the pets – he focused on the science fiction and entirely and completely overlooked a very real fungal problem associated with the buildings – dry rot. Initially, we were called in to investigate his bogus claims of toxic mould – although we didn’t find a mould problem as claimed, we did find a major dry-rot problem that he entirely overlooked (in fact, until he met us, he didn’t know what dry-rot was). In the end, seven buildings had to go through major structural renovations – at a cost that surely must have run into the hundreds of thousands of dollars.
Although we don’t see a lot of dry-rot in the Front Range area, it definitely can be a serious problem.
Cheers!
Caoimh*n P. Connell
Forensic Industrial Hygienist
Forensic Industrial Hygiene
(The opinions expressed here are exclusively my personal opinions and do not necessarily reflect my professional opinion, opinion of my employer, agency, peers, or professional affiliates. The above post is for information only and does not reflect professional advice and is not intended to supercede the professional advice of others.)
AMDG
-
04-03-2008, 06:45 AM #23
Re: Dry rot inquiry
The dry-rot issue is rather interesting
In case these guys are thinking about ragging on you again with their specious inspector mythology regarding the non-existence of dry mold, I thought I'd make this preemptive move on your behalf. Not that you need the help, just because I can't stand the blatant display of stupidity which runs amok here from time to time.
Oxford English Dictionary Second Edition
dry rot, dry-rot
- A decayed condition of timber in confined situations, in which it becomes brittle and crumbles to a dry powder; caused by various fungi, esp. species of Polyporus and Merulius, or by slow chemical processes. Also applied to any fungus causing this.
Webster’s Third New International Dictionary, Unabridged, Third Edition
dry rot n. 1: The decay of seasoned timber caused by certain fungi (as the house of fungi and some polypores) that consume the cellulose of wood leaving a mere soft skeleton that is readily reduced to powder.
Though I will agree with Arnold Mallis, Associate Professor of Entomology, Pennsylvania State University (deceased) and his editor George W. Rambo, PhD in the Eight Edition of the Handbook of Pest Control that “The term “dry rot,” generally used to describe brown rot damage is a misnomer since, as already stated, high moisture levels are needed for development. The term refers specifically to the crumbly appearance of the wood.”, it has still been in accepted common use since 1795. Who are we then to alter correct common language usage?
If we say peanuts, we are not referring to nuts at all but to legumes. If we say shooting or falling stars we are not talking about stars, are we? No, they are meteors. And if someone talks to you about palm trees do we understand that they are not really trees, but rather bamboo-like grasses? So, if we’re going to start correcting all of the misnomers in current use we will have to petition the Hann in the Sky to make us a new category on the forum . . .
Sorry about the differnt font sizes. The Hann's text editor does not like pasted objects any more than I like re-typing.
Aaron
Bookmarks