InspectionNews - Home Inspection



Welcome to the InspectionNews - Home Inspection forums.

You are currently viewing InspectionNews as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions but not pictures. There are over 6,300 inspectors who have already joined. By joining InspectionNews you will be able to see the pictures, have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast and simple so please, join InspectionNews today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Why join InspectionNews? Read the Testimonials
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 10-28-2007, 09:50 AM
Jeff Eastman Jeff Eastman is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: gone
Posts: 245
Weep holes, improper spacing
.........

Last edited by Jeff Eastman : 12-11-2007 at 07:37 PM.
Reply With Quote
Home inspection
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 10-28-2007, 11:04 AM
Richard Rushing's Avatar
Richard Rushing Richard Rushing is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Duncanville, Tx
Posts: 1,086
Re: Weep holes, improper spacing
Jeff,

Are you sure they are improperly spaced?

What are you basing your "improperly spaced" conclusion on?

Here are a couple of things to think about...
  • Yes, todays building requirements require maximum spacing at 33"
  • But... 10 years ago, was that the requirement of your jurisdiction?
  • Had your jurisdiction adopted the IRC at that time? I doubt it because back then, most of us were going under the requirements of the 1995 ICBO, One and Two Family Dwelling Code, which also requires weeps spaced at 33 inches max (703.7.4). However, you still have to find out what requirements the home was built under and not make assumptions.
It's a very tricky wicket to do retro code inspections. At this point, if the home has weeps every 3' and they are unblocked all around the home, I would not make a big deal out of it. In-other-words, it wouldn't even make my report.

Richard
__________________
"If con is the opposite of pro, is Congress the opposite of progress?"
Richard Rushing, HCRI
Duncanville, Tx.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Window Weep holes RobertSmith Building Envelope: Home Inspection and Commercial Inspection 11 10-18-2007 06:07 PM
Weep holes Jeff Eastman Building Envelope: Home Inspection and Commercial Inspection 2 08-19-2007 05:49 PM
Electrical Receptacle Spacing Tom McDonnell Electrical Systems: Home Inspection and Commercial Inspection 2 07-17-2007 03:22 PM
Weep Holes Jeff Eastman Building Envelope: Home Inspection and Commercial Inspection 13 05-30-2007 05:23 PM
Improper flahing method? Ron Bishop Roofing System: Home Inspection and Commercial Inspection 5 04-14-2007 12:17 PM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:08 PM.


Design by Vjacheslav Trushkin.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8
vB.Sponsors
All Rights Reserved. Hann Tech Marketing Link / InspectionNews.com / InspectionNews.net - No part of InspectionNews.net may be reproduced in any way, or by any means, without the prior written permission of InspectionNews.net. Use of any index or listing Software for the purpose of constructing a mailing list, creating promotional materials or producing a printed or electronic catalog of any kind is expressly forbidden without the prior written permission of InspectionNews.net - All text, graphics and design on InspectionNews.net is copyright by Hann Tech Marketing Links.
Ad Management by RedTyger