Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Austin, TX
    Posts
    375

    Default Another handrail question

    Here is another scenario. I know that the handrails are required at flights, but what about this landing. As you can see in the photo, the landing is stepped. As it is stepped, would this be consisered a continuous flight from top to bottom or two landings between flights, or two winders. Any ideas?

    Eric

    Similar Threads:
    ***IMPORTANT*** You Need To Register To View Images ***IMPORTANT*** You Need To Register To View Images
    F.I.R.E. Services

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Ormond Beach, Florida
    Posts
    25,314

    Default Re: Another handrail question

    Excellent question ( ... meaning I had to look it up and figure it out because I did not know the answer in my head ... ).

    From the IRC. (underlining and bold are mine)
    - R311.5.6 Handrails.Handrails shall be provided on at least
    one side of each continuous run of treads or flight with four
    or more risers.

    A flight of stairs is a continuous run of treads and risers, so that's a bit of redundancy there.

    Thus, if there is a flight of stairs which has four or more risers, which could be three treads and two landings (one landing at each end of the flight) as that makes four risers, there needs to be a handrail.

    Your photo shows three flights of stairs, the lower flight, the upper flight and the center flight (one stair) between the two intermediate landings.

    The lower flight has more than 4 risers, so it needs a handrail.

    The upper flight has more than 4 risers, so it needs a handrail.

    The center flight has 2 risers, so it does not need a handrail.

    Now, if those two landings were winders instead of landings, then there would be one continuous flight of stairs, and the handrail would need to be continuous from top to bottom.

    Again, though, those brackets, and that fancy spamancy plate around the support brackets are not acceptable.

    How much overhang is there on the cap on that center wall? More than 4-1/2"?

    Weird base treatment at those landings.

    The space between the upper handrail and the wall looks correct, the space between the lower handrail and the wall looks like it makes the handrail project out too far from the wall (more than 4-1/2").

    Jerry Peck, Construction / Litigation Consultant
    Construction Litigation Consultants, LLC ( www.ConstructionLitigationConsultants.com )
    www.AskCodeMan.com

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Healdsburg, CA
    Posts
    1,741

    Question Re: Another handrail question

    FWIW the west coast Jerry concurs with the east coast Jerry, however, I went to my Oxford American Dictionary for the definition of "spamacy" with no luck, so JP, what mean?

    Jerry McCarthy
    Building Code/ Construction Consultant

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Ormond Beach, Florida
    Posts
    25,314

    Default Re: Another handrail question

    Quote Originally Posted by Jerry McCarthy View Post
    I went to my Oxford American Dictionary for the definition of "spamacy" with no luck, so JP, what mean?
    I probly spelt it rung.

    Try "fancy spancy".

    Jerry Peck, Construction / Litigation Consultant
    Construction Litigation Consultants, LLC ( www.ConstructionLitigationConsultants.com )
    www.AskCodeMan.com

  5. #5
    Richard Rushing's Avatar
    Richard Rushing Guest

    Default Re: Another handrail question

    That's how the folks at Kilo-Bravo build'em.

    RR


  6. #6
    Tim Moreira's Avatar
    Tim Moreira Guest

    Default Re: Another handrail question

    Jerry M,

    Try "fancy spancy".
    Try *smancy*

    It's a Florida thing


  7. #7
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Austin, TX
    Posts
    375

    Default Re: Another handrail question

    Both Jerrys,

    Thanks for the input and the concurrence!

    I think the reasoning behind the reply is very sound.

    Tim,

    We say fancy-smancy here too. At least that's the way I always hear it. The builder will probaly understand perfectly when I write "Those fancy-smancy plates behind your support brackets at the stairway ain't gonna cut the mustard." in my report.

    Eric

    Last edited by Eric Shuman; 04-29-2007 at 08:04 AM. Reason: I forgot about this new fancy-smancy spell check thingy Brian has added to the new fancy-smancy mesage board!!

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Ormond Beach, Florida
    Posts
    25,314

    Default Re: Another handrail question

    I guess the version I grew up with was a combination of "smancy" and "spancy", i.e., "spamancy" (or 'spamncy'?).

    Anyway, I'm not married to it, so whatever you guys go with is fine with me, 'caus Iys ain't no fancy-smancy-whatever typ peeple'.

    Jerry Peck, Construction / Litigation Consultant
    Construction Litigation Consultants, LLC ( www.ConstructionLitigationConsultants.com )
    www.AskCodeMan.com

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •