|
|
|
Welcome to the InspectionNews - Home Inspection forums.
You are currently viewing InspectionNews as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions but not pictures. There are over 6,300 inspectors who have already joined. By joining InspectionNews you will be able to see the pictures, have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast and simple so please, join InspectionNews today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.
Why join InspectionNews? Read the Testimonials
|
|

09-14-2007, 06:31 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Cabot, Arkansas
Posts: 53
|
|
|
Floor damage question
The apartment showed signs of water damage on the walls and tile. Can any one tell me what might have caused this? Busted pipes in the concrete?
|
|

09-14-2007, 06:42 AM
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Rockwall Texas
Posts: 2,131
|
|
|
Re: Floor damage question
Jim,
The apartment has probably been flooded somehow in the past. To verify a damaged line below the slab, a plumber should do a pressure test.
As far as the tile, this type of damage occurs to vinyl type tiles when they have been wet. Usually after such flooding or moisture damages, the place was probably closed off. The humidy builds up within the enclosure and the floor tiles start popping up from the floor.
Rick
|
|

09-14-2007, 09:40 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 1,449
|
|
|
Re: Floor damage question
Jim, not to discount Ricks observation which is the most likely, but it might
also be a possibility that there is no vapor barrier and moisture vapor is
collecting on the back of the tile and causing it to blister.
There is the moisture line on the side will that looks like a past flood, but excessive moisture can also wick up onto walls.
Bottom line, there is water damage. Report what you see since you don't
have a crystal ball or time machine to see what happened in the past.
__________________
Jim Luttrall
Mr. Inspector.net, Inc.
Allen, Texas 75002
|
|

09-14-2007, 10:01 AM
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 725
|
|
|
Re: Floor damage question
Those tiles were normally set directly on the concrete, They may contain Asbestos also, but typical condition for water seepage conditions. That would not happen from one occurrance but would be more like every wet season or possibly heavy rain.
|
|

09-15-2007, 06:48 AM
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 538
|
|
|
Re: Floor damage question
I'm with Rick, looks like it was flooded at some point. I've only seem those tiles attached directly to slabs.
If they are 9x9 theyr ARE asbestos, if 12x12, they could be depending on their age.
Looks like past flooding to me.
JF
|
|

09-15-2007, 07:08 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Cabot, Arkansas
Posts: 53
|
|
|
Re: Floor damage question
The building was built in 1976 and the tiles are 12x12. How could you tell if they are asbestos?
|
|

09-15-2007, 07:13 AM
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 725
|
|
|
Re: Floor damage question
You can bring a chip to the lab and have it tested.
|
|

09-15-2007, 07:58 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Southborough, MA
Posts: 912
|
|
|
Re: Floor damage question
Jim. You should put something like this in your reports.
TILE/LINOLEUM FLOOR: If the existing tile was installed prior to 1980 it is possible the tile and or adhesive do contain asbestos. Lab test is only way to verify asbestos. One alternative recommended by EPA is don't sand or try to level asbestos flooring or its backing. When asbestos flooring needs replacing, install new floor covering over it, if possible. Recommend this website. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
__________________
Dave
|
|

10-20-2007, 10:35 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 3
|
|
|
Re: Floor damage question
Originally Posted by David Banks
Jim. You should put something like this in your reports.
TILE/LINOLEUM FLOOR: If the existing tile was installed prior to 1980 it is possible the tile and or adhesive do contain asbestos. Lab test is only way to verify asbestos. One alternative recommended by EPA is don't sand or try to level asbestos flooring or its backing. When asbestos flooring needs replacing, install new floor covering over it, if possible. Recommend this website. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
I have not read all the posts responding to this problem, but I see a few things here.
1. Don't I see water stains along the bottom of the walls?
2. Tile installed may contain asbestos as I think I see black adhesive wicking between tile indicating Cut-Back adhesive commonly used prior to the 1990's when tile had asbestos. If that is not black adhesive, then this may be adhesive getting soiled giving the appearance of Cut-Back adhesive.
3. If this is not flood related, my guess would be the concrete has excessive vapor emissions, however, the loose areas look to be isolated to the tile joints. Usually, we see bumps, from alkali, all over the area, not isolated to the joints.
Last edited by Ray Darrah : 10-20-2007 at 10:36 AM.
Reason: spelling
|
|

10-20-2007, 04:30 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Duncanville, Tx
Posts: 1,086
|
|
|
Re: Floor damage question
No question that is water damage.
If there was any question with the tiles, just take a look at the high wate mark on the walls.
Or, I guess there could have been a long pissing dog that was very consistent with extablishing his territory...
rr
__________________
"If con is the opposite of pro, is Congress the opposite of progress?"
Richard Rushing, HCRI
Duncanville, Tx.
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:52 AM.
| | |
|