Results 1 to 20 of 20
Thread: 234 on 789
-
07-09-2009, 05:56 PM #1
-
07-09-2009, 06:01 PM #2
Re: 234 on 789
You need an Infrared Camera to help with that image.
Best
Ron
-
07-09-2009, 06:17 PM #3
Re: 234 on 789
Hello Mr. Zinsco.
Hopefully the panel cover is intact and in place so there will be no fire if that thing decides to burn up.
-
07-09-2009, 06:18 PM #4
Re: 234 on 789
No he doesn't, he needs to recommend replacing that panel as it is a Zinsco.
Know where there is no breaker in the spot above that breaker? Look at the burned bus bar (the spot on the left bus bar).
That breaker (the hot one) has most likely welded itself to the bus bar.
-
07-09-2009, 06:30 PM #5
Re: 234 on 789
I was thinking the same thing, Jerry. Fred Flintstone could have captured this problem with a sharp beaked bird and a piece of bedrock. Not only was it fused to the panel, but the "toggle" for lack of a better term was neither in the tripped or engaged position (slid from left to right and back again without performing any function).
-
07-10-2009, 07:12 AM #6
Re: 234 on 789
Excellent catch, Bud!
Randall Aldering GHI BAOM MSM
Housesmithe Inspection
www.housesmithe.com
-
07-11-2009, 08:16 AM #7
Re: 234 on 789
Will someone please tell me the significance of "789"?
In addition, I am unable to discern that the toggle on the top breaker in the photo has moved from its "far left" position.
Secondly, I do see the small dark spot on the buss bar in the open space of the panel and I see a darkened or shadowed spot on the top side of the top breaker where it wraps the right side buss bar. I can assume that it is evidence of overheating. Is there additional evidence that I am missing?
-
07-11-2009, 09:18 AM #8
Re: 234 on 789
-
07-11-2009, 09:42 AM #9
Re: 234 on 789
-
07-11-2009, 09:48 AM #10
Re: 234 on 789
Did anyone look at the clock at 12:34 & 56 sec on 7/8/09?
That made it 123456789. If not try again in 100 years.
-
07-11-2009, 10:26 AM #11
Re: 234 on 789
-
07-11-2009, 11:10 AM #12
-
07-11-2009, 04:13 PM #13
Re: 234 on 789
I prefer the even number so I'm waiting till August of next year
2:46 on 8/10 - 2 4 6 8 10
-
07-11-2009, 04:22 PM #14
Re: 234 on 789
Possibly experience with Zinsco panels?
If you've ever seen one, you will understand what the problem is and why.
I wasn't aware of how 7, 8 & 9 fit in this example. Silly me! However, with the help of more experienced HI's and electrical contractors in my family, I've become quite aware of Zinsco-type panels. I think I am one of the few in my market area that call them out correctly for the benefit of my client and have done so for at least 10 years. And no, agents don't like me much for doing so.
Before I began home inspectors full time, only 20 years ago, I served as a code inspector. I'm still learning.
-
07-11-2009, 05:10 PM #15
Re: 234 on 789
I am wondering if I can hit the lotto using 090909 this September ninth.
-
07-11-2009, 05:29 PM #16
Re: 234 on 789
25 or 6 to 4 at least in Chicago.
-
07-11-2009, 06:43 PM #17
Re: 234 on 789
789 simply reflects the date.
"Now if uh, six........
turned out to be nine........
I dont mind, I dont mind"
-
07-11-2009, 07:42 PM #18
Re: 234 on 789
Tom,
Looks like that 789 reference was the date according to the original poster in an updated message.
Most panels, as you are aware, number one of two ways:
- down and across, i.e., top left is one, top right is two, second down on top left is three, etc.
- down the left side and then down the right side
Zinsco breakers only have one row of breakers going down, so their numbers start and the top and go 1, 2, 3, etc., which I presumed meant that 789 was breakers 7, 8, and 9. Silly me, it was the date.
-
07-11-2009, 07:55 PM #19
Re: 234 on 789
.
.......
.
YouTube - Easy Rider - Jimi Hendrix - If 6 Was 9
.
It Might have Choked Artie But it ain't gone'a choke Stymie! Our Gang " The Pooch " (1932)
Billy J. Stephens HI Service Memphis TN.
-
07-12-2009, 05:51 AM #20
Re: 234 on 789
Thanks, Bud.
Glad I asked the question.
I thought your original post seemed a bit mysterious with reference to "789". I could not figure how a high temp reading on a single breaker was referencing "breakers 7, 8 & 9". You've cleared it up.
Bookmarks