Results 1 to 23 of 23
-
04-06-2012, 03:41 AM #1
Homeowner added lights close to sink
Good morning everyone,
On a recent inspection I observed two lights that the homeowner added around a bathroom sink. The lights were added to the bathroom light circuit above the sink. The wiring is exposed running from the light above the sink to each light. The lights have a switch in which they can be turned on manually or can come on when the light above the sink is turned on. They are not sealed in any way to prevent water entry. My original thought is that they should be removed due to the possibility of electrical shock should a wet hand try and turn the light on or if water from the sink is accidentally splashed onto the bottom light. Any thoughts?
Brian
Similar Threads:
-
04-06-2012, 04:19 AM #2
Re: Homeowner added lights close to sink
Brian
I agree with your assessment. Recommend removal and upgrade the outlet at sink to GFCI protection if not already protected.
-
04-06-2012, 05:39 AM #3
Re: Homeowner added lights close to sink
Those are plug-in undercabinet fixtures & should be easy to remove & they should be removed IMHO.
-
04-06-2012, 08:26 AM #4
Re: Homeowner added lights close to sink
The lights and outlets should be protected with a GFI.
However, I don't see a lot of difference between the added outlets and lights and the wall mounted switch and outlet. Using the wet hands splash guide-lines they could see water as well.
-
04-06-2012, 09:00 AM #5
Re: Homeowner added lights close to sink
Other than the wiring method being an issue what other code is violated by these lights? If they were properly installed is there a code problem based on their location?
-
04-08-2012, 06:18 AM #6
Re: Homeowner added lights close to sink
If they are permanently wired and were installed by the current owner there should have been a permit taken out. Since this is rarely the case the buyer could request the seller to remove it or have it inspect by the local building inspector or AHJ.
-
04-08-2012, 08:55 AM #7
Re: Homeowner added lights close to sink
I probably would not make much of an issue with the lights.
Eric Barker, ACI
Lake Barrington, IL
-
04-08-2012, 10:01 AM #8
Re: Homeowner added lights close to sink
That is not a problem as there is no distance separation requirement between the lights and the sink.
The lights were added to the bathroom light circuit above the sink.
The wiring is exposed running from the light above the sink to each light.
They are not sealed in any way to prevent water entry. My original thought is that they should be removed due to the possibility of electrical shock should a wet hand try and turn the light on or if water from the sink is accidentally splashed onto the bottom light.
-
04-08-2012, 02:49 PM #9
Re: Homeowner added lights close to sink
Cord connected luminaires (portable, fixed, dropped, flush, or otherwise, lights, lamps, etc.) nor any part thereof are prohibited anywhere within three feet horizontally and 8' above the rim of a tub when a combination tub/shower is in the "bathroom".
The tub/shower "zone" is minimally considered a damp location.
The space between the flood rim/spill over point of the pictured outside wall of the tub rim and the vanity appears less than 36" horizontally. The luminaire mounted vertically upon the wall extends beyond the vanity top and towards the tub/shower.
The portable (whether afixed or not) fluorescent lamps are defaulted as dry location only, unless marked otherwise and appear to be in an incorrect orientation presuming same were to be damp location listed; even following conversion, if listed for same and/or having used a specifically listed or classified conversion kit would be in an incorrect orientation for damp location relative to the integral switch and wireway/ballast and the ability to drain condensation to other than the pins and starter contact for the tube. Neither appears to be Listed for a wall mount, at least not in the orientations pictured.
Most such lamps have a minimum 1/2" space between optic (lamp cover allowing light out) and any other surface, many have far more than a a 1/2" minimum (reflective heat).
Lamp cord is not an approved concealed wiring method (disapears in drop panel light box on the ceiling above the vanity containing other fluorescent ballasted tube/lamp luminaire/light fixture).
Old UL 1570, Present UL 1598, UL 153, etc.
NEC 110.3,
NEC 410.10(D) (tub/shower 'zone')
410.10(D) defines a 'bathrub and shower zone' that extends 3 ft (0.9 m) horizontally beyond the tub rim or shower receptor and 8 ft (2.4 m) vertically from the top of the bathtub rim (flood rim of the tub) or shower stall threshold. Prohibited within this 'zone' are:
Hanging or pendant luminaires
Lighting track
Paddle (ceiling) fans
Cord-connected luminaires.
UL White Book
Product Category Codes
Portable Lightiing Products (QOTU)
Portable Cabinet Luminaires (QOVJ)
Luminaires, Portable (QOWZ)
Portable Luminaire Acessoreis, Kits and subassemblies (QPAU)
Incandescent or fluorescent luminaires intended for installation in permanently installed cabinets, where the wiring is concealed or passed through openings in the structure, (know of none which were or are 'suitable for damp locations') are covered under Incandescent Surface-mounted Luminaires (IEZR) or Fluorescent Surface-mounted Luminaires (IEUZ) for surface mounting, or Incandescent Recessed Luminaires (IEZX) or Fluorescent Recessed Luminaires (IEVV) for recessed mounting.
Last edited by H.G. Watson, Sr.; 04-08-2012 at 03:23 PM.
-
04-08-2012, 06:15 PM #10
Re: Homeowner added lights close to sink
-
04-09-2012, 05:18 AM #11
Re: Homeowner added lights close to sink
I think Watson's point is a good one. We instantly look at the sink as the moisture origination point but the tub/shower is in close proximity. Certainly if the shower curtain isn't fully closed the light would be exposed to a damp condition at a minimum.
-
04-09-2012, 05:33 AM #12
Re: Homeowner added lights close to sink
Rather interesting given that inspectors often comment on safety issues in a home.
I personally don't see this set up as any different, it is a safety concern.
-
04-09-2012, 09:16 AM #13
Re: Homeowner added lights close to sink
It isn't always ALL ABOUT YOU PECK. Yours was not the only "question" raised, and certainly not the ONLY participation on this thread discussion before I responded. I suggest you actually try reading the thread in its entirety, in chronological order. But, yes, your post also has questionable non-qualified, unreferenced assertions. Your most recent participation (the quoted above) is uncalled for, unprofessional, and displays a glaring lack of knowledge of the ANSI/UL Standards for Safety, the product categories being displayed, asked about and discussed, as well as the actual language of the "code" (yet another ANSI Standard) refered to, as well as JUST WHAT THE SAFETY ISSUES REALLY ARE in the photographed residential bathroom. And displays yet more short-sightedness blinded perhaps by your own ego. The deterioration evidenced in the photo due to improper installation, clearances and orientation of the devices, is obvious as well.
Your selective snip ignores the entirety of the seven key points which followed, five of which apply EVEN if the installation is beyond three feet horizontally of the outside rim of the tub!
Are you inferring that Article 410, as well as Article 100 Definitions, and Section 110.3 do not apply to this installation?!? The first few chapters of the NEC apply to ALL electrical installations.
Originally Posted by 2008 NEC
Originally Posted by 2008 NEC
In so far as the "zone" I said:
Originally Posted by H.G. Watson, Sr.
We have some scale references - the 4x4 tiles on the wall employed as a backsplash to the vanity/basin, and "the usual and customary" width of an average, slightly dated toilet/water closet fixture, residential, as well as "the usual and customary" size of the average, dated, toilet paper holder brackets, and of course the PICTURED bathroom group which includes a TUB with a curtain. This of course is why I said "appears".
Originally Posted by 2008 NEC
Last edited by H.G. Watson, Sr.; 04-09-2012 at 10:37 AM.
-
04-09-2012, 10:07 AM #14
Re: Homeowner added lights close to sink
Although Peck thinks any participation on a thread discussion following his own participation is always ALL ABOUT HIM, I addressed your question in my first discussion participation in this thread, and further enhanced in my responsive post to Peck's ad hom. and unprofessional retort. However, the luminaires are not properly installed. The optics clearance are less than 1/2" from the protuding mirror trim amongst many other defects already highlighted.
-
04-09-2012, 05:02 PM #15
Re: Homeowner added lights close to sink
Quite incorrect, Watson.
When you post you throw in so much non-applicable stuff that it makes it difficult sort through the garbage to find the applicable stuff.
It isn't always ALL ABOUT YOU WATSON and what you think you know or how much you think you can impress us with.
As it turns out in this case (which I thought the tub/sink/lights would be greater than 3 feet separation), but I suspect that you may be correct as to *the right side light only*.
Your posts and information would be MUCH MORE HELPFUL if you did not fill them with so much bull and bravado ... reducing you posts to what you have been posting *recently* (versus *lately* again) ... your information would be much more helpful.
-
04-09-2012, 05:58 PM #16
-
04-09-2012, 06:19 PM #17
Re: Homeowner added lights close to sink
.
Robert,
It takes a while to Decode Mr Watson's comments.His Impression is the Shown Under Cabinet Lighting is Required by Manufacturers Installation Instructions
to be Orientated in a Particular way and has a 1/2 inch Required Clearance from the Lens Cover to the wooden mirror trim.
This Link http://www.jascoproducts.com/support...al-Eng-Spa.pdf clearly shows Neither to be the Case.
.
Last edited by Billy Stephens; 04-09-2012 at 06:27 PM.
It Might have Choked Artie But it ain't gone'a choke Stymie! Our Gang " The Pooch " (1932)
Billy J. Stephens HI Service Memphis TN.
-
04-09-2012, 06:36 PM #18
Re: Homeowner added lights close to sink
A requirement of the default air space minimums of the Standards, past and present, already referenced; for such fluorescent luminaires/systems employing the type tubes within, for residential/household use. Not a "lens cover" it is an optic, and code-wise non-compliance with NEC 110.3 as already referenced.
Every key point and reference I made was on-point and not in any way off-topic.
-
04-09-2012, 06:49 PM #19
Re: Homeowner added lights close to sink
It Might have Choked Artie But it ain't gone'a choke Stymie! Our Gang " The Pooch " (1932)
Billy J. Stephens HI Service Memphis TN.
-
04-12-2012, 11:10 AM #20
Re: Homeowner added lights close to sink
Gentlemen,
Thanks to everyone for their participation. And, as a new inspector, I appreciate all of the information provided.
Brian
-
04-12-2012, 12:18 PM #21
Re: Homeowner added lights close to sink
Brian H.,
You're welcome.
Robert M.,
It is not a "wiring method" employed, but a Product (or equipment) TYPE. It is a cord-connected luminaire, in this case a cord-connected, cord-linked portable luminaire.
Cord-connected luminaires are not a "wiring method" they are an equipment category/type utilization equipment. In this case they are both cord-linked and cord-connected (to power source). This product type, nor any portion thereof, (nor any cord-connected luminaire) is not permitted to be present anywhere within the all inclusive tub/shower zone.
Billy, Billy, Billy...(sigh).
Your example product is a direct wired permanent luminaire with a convenience receptacle. A completely different product category or type. However, it too has a required clearance. It is both marked and included in the instructions.
YOUR example product requires 1/2" clearance both below and to the front in order to: remove the "lens cover" optic without breaking it (can't follow picture diagrams either?!?), and to remove and reinstall a replacement tube. It is designed in this manner (removal, replacement design) rather than a different method because it already is required to have a minimum 1/2" clearance in the Standards for Safety for its construction.
By the way your example product is for DRY LOCATIONS ONLY, Not for use in Wet Locations, and "Not intended for use above stoves, cook tops, or sinks." (Can't read a WARNING! box?!?) and has additional code and safety restrictions regarding installation at the same locations pictured for the OPs installation such as conductive housing, conductive switch faceplate, etc. or a non-gfci protected receptacle within six feet of a sink especially a bathroom lavatory, fed by a wall switch (as the OP has indicated). It is not anything like the products the OP has pictured. YOUR item is further "Not intended for surface installation inside or on top of built-in furnishings such as kitchen cabinets, china cabinets, or trophy cases, UNLIKE the OP's pictured equipment. It is not a cord-connected luminaire, and yet you still fail to "prove" any "point" you were trying to make (otherthan the point on the end of the figurative dunce cap you might don. Furthermore your link isn't correctly formatted. I've attached the file your incorrectly formatted link was trying to direct to.
I won't bother reiterating or expanding on the distinctions regarding discharge lighting, ballasts, replacement, maintenance, tube replacement, cleaning, sharp metallic edges, safety, and naked, wet, body parts.
Last edited by H.G. Watson, Sr.; 04-12-2012 at 12:33 PM.
-
04-12-2012, 01:55 PM #22
Re: Homeowner added lights close to sink
Last edited by Billy Stephens; 04-12-2012 at 02:40 PM.
It Might have Choked Artie But it ain't gone'a choke Stymie! Our Gang " The Pooch " (1932)
Billy J. Stephens HI Service Memphis TN.
-
04-12-2012, 02:37 PM #23
Re: Homeowner added lights close to sink
All the requisite code references are likely buried in the P & W battle posts. The surface wiring should be protected from physical damage, ( portable cord is not acceptable for that, it should carry a ground wire ), and the fixtures should be GFI protected because of their proximity to the sink/water/grounded conveyence systems.
Bookmarks