Results 1 to 15 of 15

Thread: Bundling?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    so so, California
    Posts
    1,867

    Default Bundling?

    Hate to beat a dead horse, just wanted to get an opinion on the NM entering the panelboard.

    Similar Threads:
    ***IMPORTANT*** You Need To Register To View Images ***IMPORTANT*** You Need To Register To View Images
    Inspection Referral

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Columbus GA
    Posts
    3,747

    Default Re: Bundling?

    Quote Originally Posted by Marc M View Post
    Hate to beat a dead horse, just wanted to get an opinion on the NM entering the panelboard.
    Are the wires bundled? Maybe, maybe not, but likely so

    Did the electrician derate, do the calculation, and consider the derated value when they were installed? Who knows

    ' correct a wise man and you gain a friend... correct a fool and he'll bloody your nose'.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Maryland
    Posts
    1,970

    Default Re: Bundling?

    Is the nipple or conduit 24" or less? Like Rick said, there is no way to answer based on that pic.

    All answers based on unamended National Electrical codes.

  4. #4
    Ted Menelly's Avatar
    Ted Menelly Guest

    Default Re: Bundling?

    Quote Originally Posted by Marc M View Post
    Hate to beat a dead horse, just wanted to get an opinion on the NM entering the panelboard.

    From what I a looking at as far as the location of that box I would and can only say that it appears that it has to be a minimum of 2 feet to where those wires go inside thru a conduit.


  5. #5
    Robert Meier's Avatar
    Robert Meier Guest

    Default Re: Bundling?

    Like others have stated the question is unanswerable given the information and that particular photo.


  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Snowbird (this means I'm retired and migrate between locations), FL/MI
    Posts
    4,086

    Default Re: Bundling?

    The raceway might have been overfilled/overstuffed - beyond the permitted percentage of the cross sectional area, but cannot be confirmed from the photo.


  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    so so, California
    Posts
    1,867

    Default Re: Bundling?

    I get it...


  8. #8
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Santa Rosa, CA
    Posts
    3,154

    Default Re: Bundling?

    Marc,

    If that is a conduit, then as has been said, who knows. If that is a strain relief clamp, then I believe it to be improper. If I remember correctly, strain relief clamps are good for two flat (2-wire with ground) cables or one round (3-wire with ground) cable.

    Department of Redundancy Department
    Supreme Emperor of Hyperbole
    http://www.FullCircleInspect.com/

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Fletcher, NC
    Posts
    28,032

    Default Re: Bundling?

    That is so wrong in so many ways ...

    Jerry Peck
    Construction/Litigation/Code Consultant - Retired
    www.AskCodeMan.com

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    so so, California
    Posts
    1,867

    Default Re: Bundling?

    Quote Originally Posted by Jerry Peck View Post
    That is so wrong in so many ways ...
    You have my attention...please go on..


  11. #11
    Robert Meier's Avatar
    Robert Meier Guest

    Default Re: Bundling?

    Quote Originally Posted by Marc M View Post
    You have my attention...please go on..
    Can you provide more details and/or photo's to further explain what we're looking at?


  12. #12
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    so so, California
    Posts
    1,867

    Default Re: Bundling?

    Id love to but that's all there is. New house, new panel. I'm guessing the installer probably used the conduit to help with routing the conductors into the panel.
    I honestly cant see conduit running from the panel to the house. I'm sure the conductors are run in a drywalled chase, out of conduit.


  13. #13
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Fletcher, NC
    Posts
    28,032

    Default Re: Bundling?

    Quote Originally Posted by Marc M View Post
    You have my attention...please go on..
    Quote Originally Posted by Rick Cantrell View Post
    Are the wires bundled? Maybe, maybe not, but likely so ...
    Quote Originally Posted by H.G. Watson, Sr. View Post
    The raceway might have been overfilled/overstuffed - beyond the permitted percentage of the cross sectional area, ...
    Quote Originally Posted by Gunnar Alquist View Post
    If that is a strain relief clamp, then I believe it to be improper. If I remember correctly, strain relief clamps are good for two flat (2-wire with ground) cables or one round (3-wire with ground) cable.
    The above are all applicable from what appears to be shown in that photo:
    - If that is conduit, and if that is over 24" long which is likely is, then lack of maintaining spacing would apply. I'm going to guess that there are *at least* 10 NM cables in there, which means *at least* 20 current carrying conductors, so derating would be by a hefty amount.
    - Let's take the worst case first: That those conductor run up into an attic of a one story house:
    - - Let's presume the attic only gets to 123-131 degrees during the hottest time of the year - that is a derating factor of 0.76 for ambient for NM-B, or 30 amp derating capacity for #12 AWG NM-B x 0.76 = 22.8 amps derated for ambient x 0.50 for 10-20 conductors = 11.4 amps derated = not even suitable for a 15 amp breaker. And that is for *only* up to 20 conductors and I am estimating *at least* 20 conductors.
    - Let's take a less sever case second: That the conductors run up into a floor space in a two story house:
    - Let's presume that conduit is in the exterior wall with no insulation around it (that is a reasonable presumption because of the conduits size), and let's presume that the ambient temperature never gets over 87-95 degrees during the hottest time of the year - that is a derating factor of 0.96 for that NM-B, the derating would be 30 amps x 0.96 = 28.8 amps x the 0.50 for 10-20 conductors (which is best case as I am thinking more than 20) - 14.4 amps = STILL not suitable for a 15 amp breaker.
    - Let's go next-to-best case now:
    - - no derating for ambient at all, just for the number of conductors: 30 amps x 0.50 = 15 amps = just barely suitable for a 15 amp breaker, but still not suitable for the expected 20 amp breaker for the #12 AWG.
    - Let's go to the best case now:
    - - Let's presume that is not a conduit, just a large NM cable clamp and no derating for ambient = no problem for ampacity, but there is that problem with all those NM cables not being properly secured to the enclosure.

    Jerry Peck
    Construction/Litigation/Code Consultant - Retired
    www.AskCodeMan.com

  14. #14
    Erik Pendleton's Avatar
    Erik Pendleton Guest

    Default Re: Bundling?

    Quote Originally Posted by Jerry Peck View Post
    The above are all applicable from what appears to be shown in that photo:
    - If that is conduit, and if that is over 24" long which is likely is, then lack of maintaining spacing would apply. I'm going to guess that there are *at least* 10 NM cables in there, which means *at least* 20 current carrying conductors, so derating would be by a hefty amount.
    - Let's take the worst case first: That those conductor run up into an attic of a one story house:
    - - Let's presume the attic only gets to 123-131 degrees during the hottest time of the year - that is a derating factor of 0.76 for ambient for NM-B, or 30 amp derating capacity for #12 AWG NM-B x 0.76 = 22.8 amps derated for ambient x 0.50 for 10-20 conductors = 11.4 amps derated = not even suitable for a 15 amp breaker. And that is for *only* up to 20 conductors and I am estimating *at least* 20 conductors.
    Why would the 2 derates be cumulative? I understand derating wire in the attic, and derating wire that is bundled, but if they are not bundled in the attic, what sense is there in applying both derates for the whole wire? I seems to me you you derate the wire for bundling, and derate the wire for the attic temp, and take the lower of the 2, not combine them?

    Just asking for a source that indicates derating factors for different areas are cumulative across areas. Seems counter intuitive.


  15. #15
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Tulsa, OK
    Posts
    544

    Default Re: Bundling?

    Quote Originally Posted by Erik Pendleton View Post
    Why would the 2 derates be cumulative? I understand derating wire in the attic, and derating wire that is bundled, but if they are not bundled in the attic, what sense is there in applying both derates for the whole wire? I seems to me you you derate the wire for bundling, and derate the wire for the attic temp, and take the lower of the 2, not combine them?

    Just asking for a source that indicates derating factors for different areas are cumulative across areas. Seems counter intuitive.

    If the conductors are both bundled and run through a high ambient temperature, the NEC requires both adjustments be made for those conductors affected. If part of the conductors only are bundled or are only ran through a higher temperature, only that single adjustment needs to be made. Both conditions add heat to the conductor as does the current flow. Since we are protecting the insulation (which is temperature rated and the weak link, usually) all adjustments need to be applied that the conductor is exposed to. There is not one specific statement that states this and that is one reason why the NEC is NOT a training manual..The other things to consider are the temperature limitations of the terminations, splices, raceway, etc..

    "Get correct views of life, and learn to see the world in its true light. It will enable you to live pleasantly, to do good, and, when summoned away, to leave without regret. " Robert E. Lee

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •