Results 1 to 8 of 8
-
10-17-2016, 05:35 PM #1
Just so you don’t get too confident in your equipment. See video
There's an old saying:
........" A man with a watch knows what time it is.....A man with two watches is not quite sure"......
Just so you don’t get too confident in your equipment. Three GFCI testers on a known good floor mounted circuit. I made this video today.
<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JJ5SAAsAQTg">
Similar Threads:
-
10-17-2016, 06:49 PM #2
Re: Just so you don’t get too confident in your equipment. See video
Gene,
I would change the title/heading from 'GFCI testers' (because you are not testing the GFCI function) to 'cheap 3-light circuit testers' (because that what you are testing - 'cheap' '3-light circuit testers'.
What were your results when you followed those with a SureTest?
Those things are worth what they cost ... when used as night lights (and they are actually kind of expensive for night lights, guess the cost is for 'the industrial design look'?).
We've beat those cheap 3-light testers to death before ... ... use a SureTest, with the voltage reading, that gives a good and reliable (and relatively quick) test.
While the SureTest can do things the tester in the photo below cannot do, the tester in the photo does something that even a SureTest cannot do - checks voltage H-N, H-G, N-G all at the same time.
(top meter read between top H-N slots, lower left meter reads between N-G, right meter reads between H-G)
(as receptacle is normally installed with ground down)
First photos shows correct polarity (voltage H-N and H-G), second photo shows reverse polarity (voltage H-N and N-G).
Last edited by Jerry Peck; 10-17-2016 at 06:57 PM. Reason: added last sentence showing polarity - then corrected last line
-
10-18-2016, 07:20 AM #3
Re: Just so you don’t get too confident in your equipment. See video
Hi Jerry, yes I agree completely.
I suspect the majority of inspectors are using the type of circuit testers shown in the video. Probably nearly all of the inspectors are.
- - - Updated - - -
Hi Jerry, yes I agree completely.
I suspect the majority of inspectors are using the type of circuit testers shown in the video. Probably nearly all of the inspectors are.
-
10-18-2016, 11:17 AM #4
Re: Just so you don’t get too confident in your equipment. See video
Did you actually confirm what was going on at that outlet? A wiggy would give you a very quick answer.
I suspect that two of the testers are defective, and give erroneous readings at every outlet.
-
10-22-2016, 09:09 AM #5
Re: Just so you don’t get too confident in your equipment. See video
Another thought, I have had outlets you can "wiggle" the tester and change the readings??? Any chance that outlet is loose internally or has loose connections and you were "wiggling" it while changing testers?? I know those things aren't a positive result but I would be sure to rule out any other options first. Just a thought.
-
10-22-2016, 09:19 AM #6
Re: Just so you don’t get too confident in your equipment. See video
-
10-22-2016, 01:33 PM #7
Re: Just so you don’t get too confident in your equipment. See video
Patrick
I find I get the same results as you, but I think it is attributable to outlets that are used often. At least in my experience.
-
10-23-2016, 09:42 AM #8
Re: Just so you don’t get too confident in your equipment. See video
In 12 years of inspections (I have no idea how many that is but its a bunch) I have never had an outlet test incorrect that wasn't confirmed by repairs as being incorrect. Even the "wiggly" outlets that change the tester to date have all been found incorrect. That doesn't mean I haven't had outlets that tested correctly that may have been bad and the tester didn't pick them up, always possible and I don't 100% trust those inexpensive testers either, I use a much more expensive one that by theory shouldn't have mis-readings. If I find any movement in an outlet I call it out, was trained to do that since moving outlets can wear on components such as copper wiring, they are designed to be solid mounted and therefore should be as such.
Bookmarks