Results 1 to 17 of 17
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    MONTREAL QUEBEC-CANADA
    Posts
    2,075

    Default Neutral bus question.

    I seem to remember a thread were 2 neutral conductors terminated at the same point under one lug. I forget how the string proceeded.
    Seeing there are breakers that accept two conductors in a service or remote panel, is it acceptable to terminate two neutral wires on a single screw or lug in a neutral bus?
    Much thanks.
    Looking forward to reading the answer/s.

    Similar Threads:
    OREP Insurance
    Robert Young's Montreal Home Inspection Services Inc.
    Call (514) 489-1887 or (514) 441-3732
    Our Motto; Putting information where you need it most, "In your hands.”

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Fletcher, NC
    Posts
    28,032

    Default Re: Neutral bus question.

    Quote Originally Posted by ROBERT YOUNG View Post
    ... is it acceptable to terminate two neutral wires on a single screw or lug in a neutral bus?
    No.

    Joe E Brown
    Charlie Chaplin
    Groucho Marx
    Abbott and Costello
    (said I had to have characters minimum)

    Jerry Peck
    Construction/Litigation/Code Consultant - Retired
    www.AskCodeMan.com

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    MONTREAL QUEBEC-CANADA
    Posts
    2,075

    Default Re: Neutral bus question.

    Quote Originally Posted by Jerry Peck View Post
    No.

    Joe E Brown
    Charlie Chaplin
    Groucho Marx
    Abbott and Costello
    (said I had to have characters minimum)
    I think Lon Chaney would have covered that.

    Robert Young's Montreal Home Inspection Services Inc.
    Call (514) 489-1887 or (514) 441-3732
    Our Motto; Putting information where you need it most, "In your hands.”

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Eastern Shore of MD, NEC 2008
    Posts
    94

    Default Re: Neutral bus question.

    JP is correct, more specifically NEC 2014:

    408.41 Grounded Conductor Terminations.
    Each grounded conductor shall terminate within the panelboard in an individual terminal that is not also used for another conductor.



  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    MONTREAL QUEBEC-CANADA
    Posts
    2,075

    Default Re: Neutral bus question.

    Quote Originally Posted by Derek Guridi View Post
    JP is correct, more specifically NEC 2014:
    Much thanks.
    I was looking for something codified.

    I understand the concept. One circuit conductor per neutral termination point.
    I am not disputing that.

    Could some explain the Exception: (Parallel conductors.) rule.
    Would this be two (2) conductors under one breaker/circuit?
    There are two breaker manufacturers that product breakers that can be tapped on the terminal two times. Would those conductors be considered parallel?
    If not, please explain the term, (Parallel conductors.)

    Much thanks as always.

    Robert Young's Montreal Home Inspection Services Inc.
    Call (514) 489-1887 or (514) 441-3732
    Our Motto; Putting information where you need it most, "In your hands.”

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Osceola, AR
    Posts
    311

    Default Re: Neutral bus question.

    Parallel conductors would originate at A source (a meter base or service disconnect for instance) and then be routed to A termination (the main lugs at a distribution panel). The conductors must be electrically joined.

    Each conductor would need to be connected to it's own lug at the service disconnect and at the distribution panel OR the lugs would need to be labeled & listed for more than one conductor. Parallel conductors should be 1/0 minimum.
    Two conductors connected to a breaker would not be in parallel unless they follow the above. I have not seen standard branch circuit breakers in a residential system that would accept a 1/0 conductor.

    http://www.ecmag.com/section/systems...ected-parallel
    for your reading enjoyment

    Alton Darty
    ATN Services, LLC
    www.arinspections.com

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    High Springs, Florida
    Posts
    174

    Default Re: Neutral bus question.

    408.41 Grounded Conductor Terminations. Each grounded
    conductor shall terminate within the panelboard in an individual
    terminal that is not also used for another conductor.

    "The intent of this requirement is to ensure that the grounded (neutral) conductor of a multiwire branch circuit is not momentarily disconnected, which could result in the destruction of electrical equipment and fires from overvoltage."


    www.1stproinspection.com

    Certified Master Inspector
    Like Us On Facebook
    https://www.facebook.com/1stproinspection/

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Eastern Shore of MD, NEC 2008
    Posts
    94

    Default Re: Neutral bus question.

    Quote Originally Posted by Roy Lewis View Post
    408.41 Grounded Conductor Terminations. Each grounded
    conductor shall terminate within the panelboard in an individual
    terminal that is not also used for another conductor.

    "The intent of this requirement is to ensure that the grounded (neutral) conductor of a multiwire branch circuit is not momentarily disconnected, which could result in the destruction of electrical equipment and fires from overvoltage."
    Hate to nit pick, but I will.

    When quoting someone it is generally required/polite to cite the source as to give the original author credit and also allow one to decide on the validity/credibility of the author/source. The parentheses (quote) punctuation is a good step, but a citation is really a must IMO. Sorry if I sound priggish, but I am very sensitive on copywrite/plagiarism issues.

    I will guess this your source or close; words there are verbatim to your quote.

    https://www.mikeholt.com/videodispla...hp?pageid=2112


  9. #9
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    High Springs, Florida
    Posts
    174

    Default Re: Neutral bus question.

    I didn't remember where I got it from.
    It was just in my narrative collection.


    Quote Originally Posted by Derek Guridi View Post
    Hate to nit pick, but I will.

    When quoting someone it is generally required/polite to cite the source as to give the original author credit and also allow one to decide on the validity/credibility of the author/source. The parentheses (quote) punctuation is a good step, but a citation is really a must IMO. Sorry if I sound priggish, but I am very sensitive on copywrite/plagiarism issues.

    I will guess this your source or close; words there are verbatim to your quote.

    https://www.mikeholt.com/videodispla...hp?pageid=2112



    www.1stproinspection.com

    Certified Master Inspector
    Like Us On Facebook
    https://www.facebook.com/1stproinspection/

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    MONTREAL QUEBEC-CANADA
    Posts
    2,075

    Default Re: Neutral bus question.

    Quote Originally Posted by Alton Darty View Post
    Parallel conductors would originate at A source (a meter base or service disconnect for instance) and then be routed to A termination (the main lugs at a distribution panel). The conductors must be electrically joined.
    Thanks, Alton.
    I know I am stretching codified.
    My example is not metering point or service disconnected.
    Think of, A source as the service panel break.
    The A source accepts two cables/conductor.
    As you expressed, the conductors must be electrically joined and they are a the breaker.

    Think of why the code separates neutral conductors per bus terminal.
    If 2 conductors served one breaker on a circuit, why could the conductors not share a neutral termination point.

    Thanks for your patients.

    Robert Young's Montreal Home Inspection Services Inc.
    Call (514) 489-1887 or (514) 441-3732
    Our Motto; Putting information where you need it most, "In your hands.”

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Fletcher, NC
    Posts
    28,032

    Default Re: Neutral bus question.

    Quote Originally Posted by ROBERT YOUNG View Post
    Think of why the code separates neutral conductors per bus terminal.
    If 2 conductors served one breaker on a circuit, why could the conductors not share a neutral termination point.
    Let's simply the thought process down to the basics of what happens:

    - Two conductors at one breaker, each conductor is a part of one circuit off one overcurrent device.
    - - Remove (switch off) one conductor.

    - Two conductors at one neutral termination, each conductor is a separate circuit off two overcurrent devices.
    - - Remove ( switch off ) one conductor.

    The first scenario results in switching off one 'hot' conductor.

    The second scenario results in switching off one neutral conductor.

    Should the neutral be switched?

    Jerry Peck
    Construction/Litigation/Code Consultant - Retired
    www.AskCodeMan.com

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    MONTREAL QUEBEC-CANADA
    Posts
    2,075

    Default Re: Neutral bus question.

    Quote Originally Posted by Jerry Peck View Post
    Let's simply the thought process down to the basics of what happens:
    That is what I have been attempting to do. Many scenarios. That is why I am still at the thread.


    Quote Originally Posted by Jerry Peck View Post
    - Two conductors at one breaker, each conductor is a part of one circuit off one overcurrent device.
    - - Remove (switch off) one conductor.
    To remove one conductor the breaker requires to be turned/switched off.
    Both conductor are deenergized.

    Quote Originally Posted by Jerry Peck View Post
    - Two conductors at one neutral termination, each conductor is a separate circuit off two overcurrent devices.
    - - Remove ( switch off ) one conductor.
    I disagree.
    Two conductors at one neutral termination, each conductor an extended circuit off "one" overcurrent devices.

    The breaker tapped at the terminal saddle to extend the circuit.
    Square D breakers and Cutler Hammer manufacture overcurrent devices/breakers rated for two wire connections/conductors. This allows the circuit to be extended.

    Quote Originally Posted by Jerry Peck View Post
    The first scenario results in switching off one 'hot' conductor.
    I disagree. It switches of both conductors. To maintenance a circuit, you switch off the breaker therefor deenergizing both conductors. If one conductor was removed from the breaker that is capable of accepting two conductors to abandon the circuit extension, that would be another story. The electrician would remove the one neutral as well.


    Quote Originally Posted by Jerry Peck View Post
    The second scenario results in switching off one neutral conductor.
    Should the neutral be switched?[/QUOTE]
    Neutrals should not be switched.

    I do not mean to be flogging a dead horse but I still do not see why two conductors utilizing one breaker can not terminate at one neutral termination point if the conductors are not separated at the break for maintenance or to abandon one part of the circuit.

    Is my hypothesis correct?

    Last edited by ROBERT YOUNG; 10-30-2016 at 03:23 PM.
    Robert Young's Montreal Home Inspection Services Inc.
    Call (514) 489-1887 or (514) 441-3732
    Our Motto; Putting information where you need it most, "In your hands.”

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Fletcher, NC
    Posts
    28,032

    Default Re: Neutral bus question.

    Robert,

    Go back through my post, except instead of thinking about something I didn't say, keep with what I did say.

    I.e. I didn't say anything about turning a breaker off, only about removing a conductor. And I made sure to connect the idea that removing a conductor is essentially the same as switching the conductor off.

    Then I tied it together with switching a 'hot' off (which is okay) and switching a neutral off (which is not okay).

    Now what do you get when you re-read it?

    Jerry Peck
    Construction/Litigation/Code Consultant - Retired
    www.AskCodeMan.com

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    MONTREAL QUEBEC-CANADA
    Posts
    2,075

    Default Re: Neutral bus question.

    Quote Originally Posted by Jerry Peck View Post
    Robert,

    Go back through my post, except instead of thinking about something I didn't say, keep with what I did say.
    Quote Originally Posted by Jerry Peck View Post
    I.e. I didn't say anything about turning a breaker off, only about removing a conductor. And I made sure to connect the idea that removing a conductor is essentially the same as switching the conductor off.
    I understand.

    Quote Originally Posted by Jerry Peck View Post
    Then I tied it together with switching a 'hot' off (which is okay) and switching a neutral off (which is not okay).
    Got it.
    Quote Originally Posted by Jerry Peck View Post
    Now what do you get when you re-read it?
    Why one conductor is required per neutral bus termination.
    Much appreciated.

    Robert Young's Montreal Home Inspection Services Inc.
    Call (514) 489-1887 or (514) 441-3732
    Our Motto; Putting information where you need it most, "In your hands.”

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Southern Vancouver Island
    Posts
    4,607

    Default Re: Neutral bus question.

    I see the point in the discussion, but get more confused by trying to read the JP/RY stuff, no offense.

    Removing a neutral conductor while a circuit is energized is foolhardy, we all agree.
    I believe the logic behind the rule is that while removing the correct neutral where two neutrals were double-lugged, the other neutral might be pulled out. Alternately, he could pull the wrong neutral, as they are not easily identified in the field. If the electrician failed to de-energize that second circuit, bad things could happen.

    FYI, in Canada, there is a 3rd brand of breakers that allow double taps. Schneider, owners of Square D and others, makes a Schneider panel that uses HO-style breakers. The Schneider breakers have double jaws just like the Square D type.

    John Kogel, RHI, BC HI Lic #47455
    www.allsafehome.ca

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    MONTREAL QUEBEC-CANADA
    Posts
    2,075

    Default Re: Neutral bus question.

    Quote Originally Posted by John Kogel View Post
    I see the point in the discussion, but get more confused by trying to read the JP/RY stuff, no offense.

    Removing a neutral conductor while a circuit is energized is foolhardy, we all agree.
    I believe the logic behind the rule is that while removing the correct neutral where two neutrals were double-lugged, the other neutral might be pulled out. Alternately, he could pull the wrong neutral, as they are not easily identified in the field. If the electrician failed to de-energize that second circuit, bad things could happen.

    FYI, in Canada, there is a 3rd brand of breakers that allow double taps. Schneider, owners of Square D and others, makes a Schneider panel that uses HO-style breakers. The Schneider breakers have double jaws just like the Square D type.
    Thanks for chiming in, John.
    I am sure/certain others have asked the same question but let the thread play out.

    Robert Young's Montreal Home Inspection Services Inc.
    Call (514) 489-1887 or (514) 441-3732
    Our Motto; Putting information where you need it most, "In your hands.”

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Fletcher, NC
    Posts
    28,032

    Default Re: Neutral bus question.


    Quote Originally Posted by John Kogel View Post
    I believe the logic behind the rule is that while removing the correct neutral where two neutrals were double-lugged, the other neutral might be pulled out. Alternately, he could pull the wrong neutral, as they are not easily identified in the field. If the electrician failed to de-energize that second circuit, bad things could happen.
    From the NEC Handbook: (not typing all of it, too long, but enough to show what it says, which is still a lot to type)
    - (blah, blah, blah) The use of a single termination point within a panelboard to connect more than one grounded conductor to connect a grounded conductor and an equipment grounding conductor can be problematic when it is necessary to isolate a particular grounded conductor for testing purposes. For example, if the grounded conductors of two branch circuits were terminated at a single connection point and it were necessary to isolate one branch circuit for the purposes of troubleshooting, the fact that the circuit not being tested remained energized could create an unsafe working condition for service personnel disconnecting the grounded conductor of the circuit being tested. (blah, blah, blah)

    Jerry Peck
    Construction/Litigation/Code Consultant - Retired
    www.AskCodeMan.com

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •