Results 1 to 8 of 8
Thread: Distribution Panels
-
03-17-2008, 09:49 PM #1
Distribution Panels
Can I chalk this up to the electrician having a bad day? Does anyone know what the requirements are regarding securing wires entering panels. Is it 12 inches?
Similar Threads:
-
03-18-2008, 04:42 AM #2
Re: Distribution Panels
Yep...NEC 334.30...within 12" of every cabinet, box, or fitting.
-
03-18-2008, 07:05 AM #3
Re: Distribution Panels
They also cannot jam so many cables into one clamp unless the clamp is listed for it. I believe two NM cables is the limit. Could someone confim and provide a source on that for me? tx.
Wahooo.... post #100 on the new board!
Last edited by Brandon Chew; 03-18-2008 at 07:07 AM. Reason: post 100
-
03-18-2008, 12:48 PM #4
Re: Distribution Panels
Plus ...
They are 'bundling or not maintaining spacing' for what looks like more than 24" for 'multi-conductor cables' too.
Derating in now required.
-
03-18-2008, 01:13 PM #5
Re: Distribution Panels
There were a few other problems not visible in the photo. Wrote it up as further evaluation by electrician to correct multiple installation insufficiencies.
-
03-19-2008, 04:25 PM #6
Re: Distribution Panels
Watch Bundling of romex cables as anything over 4 wires would have to be derated. Especially if insulation material is installed in these cavitys.
-
03-19-2008, 04:36 PM #7
Re: Distribution Panels
If even two NM cables (any multi-wire cable for that matter) are bundled or spacing was not maintained, then derating takes affect.
The code references "more than 3" but is also references "multi-conductor cables", because if you have 2 2-conductor cables (i.e., 2 multi-conductor cables), you have 4 conductors.
Derating then becomes
4-6 conductors - derate to 80%
7-9 conductors - derate to 70%
10-20 conductors - derate to 50%
21-30 conductors - derate to 45%
31-40 conductors - derate to 40%
41+ conductors - derate to 35%
-
03-19-2008, 04:40 PM #8
Re: Distribution Panels
Mathew,
At the top of the second picture are those cables going up into the return air duct?
Bookmarks