InspectionNews - Home Inspection



Welcome to the InspectionNews - Home Inspection forums.

You are currently viewing InspectionNews as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions but not pictures. There are over 4,500 inspectors who have already joined. By joining InspectionNews you will be able to see the pictures, have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast and simple so please, join InspectionNews today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Why join InspectionNews? Read the Testimonials
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 05-13-2008, 07:15 AM
Nick Ostrowski Nick Ostrowski is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Spring City/Surrounding Philadelphia area
Posts: 648
Denergizing Panel Requirement
Does anybody have an idea how long it has been required for service panels to need no more than 6 throws of the hand to denergize the entire panel? I saw an older split bus panel yesterday that needed 10 throws to shut it down.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 05-13-2008, 07:27 AM
Matt Fellman Matt Fellman is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Oregon
Posts: 552
Re: Denergizing Panel Requirement
I don't think there was ever a time 10 was okay. All I've ever heard was 6 and now 1. I suppose it's possible that there was a time period that it just wasn't addressed so you could find anything.

But really, circuit breakers didn't come about until the 50's/60's and by the 60's I'm pretty sure it was the 6 throws of the hand rule. I seem to remember even the old Pushmatic panels from the 50's/60's had a 'sub-main' and fell under the 6 switches.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 05-13-2008, 09:14 AM
Jerry Peck Jerry Peck is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Ormond Beach, Florida
Posts: 6,010
Re: Denergizing Panel Requirement
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nick Ostrowski View Post
Does anybody have an idea how long it has been required for service panels to need no more than 6 throws of the hand to denergize the entire panel? I saw an older split bus panel yesterday that needed 10 throws to shut it down.
Back before time began ...

If there were more than 6 in the section which serves as the main (and which controls the other section), then it was improperly done, with improper breakers (the label will show a schematic showing the double pole breakers in the 'main' section, and it probably will not show any single pole breaker in that section - because that would allow the total number of 'mains' to exceed 6).
__________________
Jerry Peck
Construction / Litigation Consultant www.ConstructionLitigationConsultants.com
Ormond Beach, Florida
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 05-13-2008, 12:00 PM
Richard Abrams Richard Abrams is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Lewiston Idaho
Posts: 37
Re: Denergizing Panel Requirement
6 disconnects is still the rule However these need to be grouped together and labeled. I have been in business since 1977 and there was never 10 disconnects allowed. Also becareful if it is a split bus panel as there are little different.
__________________
Arguing with an inspector is like wrestling a pig in the mud, pretty soon you realize the pig enjoys it.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 05-13-2008, 10:01 PM
Nick Ostrowski Nick Ostrowski is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Spring City/Surrounding Philadelphia area
Posts: 648
Re: Denergizing Panel Requirement
Thanks guys.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Minimum branch ckt requirement Wendell Swedberg Electrical Systems: Home Inspection and Commercial Inspection 7 04-30-2008 07:56 AM
No PIA requirement Richard Stanley Business Operations: Home Inspectors & Commercial Inspectors 49 09-21-2007 09:04 AM
Elbow support requirement Jeff Eastman Heating, Ventilation, Air Conditioning (HVAC): Home Inspection and Commercial Inspection 2 08-19-2007 04:06 PM
Receptacle-cook top clearence requirement. M Kelekci Electrical Systems: Home Inspection and Commercial Inspection 3 07-28-2007 10:26 PM
Height requirement for exterior box David Macy Electrical Systems: Home Inspection and Commercial Inspection 8 07-16-2007 03:56 PM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:45 AM.


Design by Vjacheslav Trushkin.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8
vB.Sponsors
All Rights Reserved. Hann Tech Marketing Link / InspectionNews.com / InspectionNews.net - No part of InspectionNews.net may be reproduced in any way, or by any means, without the prior written permission of InspectionNews.net. Use of any index or listing Software for the purpose of constructing a mailing list, creating promotional materials or producing a printed or electronic catalog of any kind is expressly forbidden without the prior written permission of InspectionNews.net - All text, graphics and design on InspectionNews.net is copyright by Hann Tech Marketing Links.
Ad Management by RedTyger