InspectionNews - Home Inspection



Welcome to the InspectionNews - Home Inspection forums.

You are currently viewing InspectionNews as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions but not pictures. There are over 6,300 inspectors who have already joined. By joining InspectionNews you will be able to see the pictures, have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast and simple so please, join InspectionNews today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Why join InspectionNews? Read the Testimonials
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 01-25-2008, 12:40 PM
Paul Kondzich Paul Kondzich is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Woodland Park, CO.
Posts: 170
Another new improper mitigation system
I thought I had heard it all about mitigators in this area. Well here is a new one, the charge was $1475 for the system (2 penetrations 1 fan.) This is a "Stage 1 " system, which does not guarantee anything, does not retest, nothing. The buyers have contacted me for another test (original result 17.6)
If the results are still high the company will come back and it will become a "Stage 2" mitigation (whatever that is) for an additional $1175. I am not sure if they will go by my results or they would retest. Anyway with that being said I went this morning to start the second test, and for some reason made it a point to grab the camera. I went around back and was surprised what I saw. This was the first system I have seen here that actually came from under the eave. The only problems were, it was not 10' off the ground. It was within 4' of an openable window. There is also a gable vent above it, I dont know the exact distance because the roof was an iced. So anyway the agent gets the mitigation guy on the phone, and he says I dont know anything, and home inspectors arent qualified to give opinions on mitigation systems. ( Even though I have taken the AARST & NEHA exams.) Oh well another day of dealing with idiots. Oh the best part was the fan wasnt working. It was plugged into a garage outlet. So I went out to look at the fan and its a low voltage motor, but was plugged into 120 V receptacle.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg DSC02252.JPG (77.6 KB, 111 views)
File Type: jpg DSC02253.JPG (65.8 KB, 99 views)
__________________
Paul Kondzich
www.altitudehomeinspection.com
Reply With Quote
Home inspection
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 01-25-2008, 03:15 PM
Lee Nettnin's Avatar
Lee Nettnin Lee Nettnin is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Hamlin, New York
Posts: 88
Re: Another new improper mitigation system
WOW!!!
What a POC job. Radon midigation exhaust is not allowed in a gutter pipe, and it is supposed to be labeled. Plus the problems you noted. This guy should be shot.

-Radon reduction systems must be clearly labeled.
-The exhaust pipe must vent above the surface of the roof and 10 feet or more abovr the ground, and at least 10 feet away from windows, doors, or other openings, if the exhaust pipe does not vent at least 2 feet above these openings.
-The exhaust fan must be NOT located in or below a livable area, yes a garage can be a livable area.
-A warning device must be installed to alert you if an active system stops working. I assume that was not done either because you said the fan was not working, and is probably burnt out now by plugging into 120volt.
__________________
www.eagleeyeinspectionshome.com

Last edited by Lee Nettnin : 01-25-2008 at 03:25 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 01-25-2008, 03:34 PM
Paul Kondzich Paul Kondzich is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Woodland Park, CO.
Posts: 170
Re: Another new improper mitigation system
Lee I wasnt aware that gutter pipe was prohibited. They are ALL that way here, there is even an adapter to make the 4" PVC transition to the gutter pipe nicely.
__________________
Paul Kondzich
www.altitudehomeinspection.com
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 01-25-2008, 04:13 PM
Lee Nettnin's Avatar
Lee Nettnin Lee Nettnin is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Hamlin, New York
Posts: 88
Re: Another new improper mitigation system
Hi Paul,
My bad, I just looked it up and it is allowed outside only. I disagree with that however as it seems to me that the exhausted air will leak out of every joint in a downspout.
__________________
www.eagleeyeinspectionshome.com
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 03-08-2008, 07:37 PM
Michael P. O'Handley Michael P. O'Handley is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Kenmore, WA
Posts: 87
Re: Another new improper mitigation system
Hi,

That system wasn't installed by this guy was it? I hear he's living in Colorado now. I noticed him lecturing some folks on another board this morning about ethics of all things.

ONE TEAM - ONE FIGHT!!!

Mike
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 03-09-2008, 11:07 AM
Scott Patterson's Avatar
Scott Patterson Scott Patterson is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Spring Hill (Nashville), TN
Posts: 1,751
Re: Another new improper mitigation system
Truth be known, even though it is not a correct installation I would be willing to bet that it has lowered the levels of radon in the home. Don't forget that radon dissipates easily.
__________________
Scott Patterson
Spring Hill, TN
http://www.traceinspections.com
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 03-10-2008, 07:42 PM
Markus Keller Markus Keller is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Chicago IL
Posts: 447
Re: Another new improper mitigation system
I don't know squat about radon mitigation but I think ray charles could tell that installation is wrong.
__________________
Accurate Inspections & Consulting, Inc.
773/844-4AIC
Markus Keller
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 03-10-2008, 09:45 PM
Paul Kondzich Paul Kondzich is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Woodland Park, CO.
Posts: 170
Re: Another new improper mitigation system
Scott, after I did 2 more radon tests, because of the way the house was layed out, hense the 2 perforations through the slab the average level was 1.6. Yes this is a huge improvement, normally I am not called to do the retest, or even see the mitigation system afterwards. In this case I was, and even though I put nothing in writing about the installation, I knew it was wrong, and the installer came back and fixed it. After he installed the extra 10' of pipe to make it correct, the line on the manometer went up by one line??? but was still within specs so dont let them tell you that that much extra exhaust pipe will decrease the efficiency by that much.

So even though the original install was probably fine I assumed we were here to call right from wrong???
__________________
Paul Kondzich
www.altitudehomeinspection.com
Reply With Quote
Home inspection
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Improper Column Jon Randolph Structural Components: Home Inspection and Commercial Inspection 11 11-24-2007 07:55 AM
Weep holes, improper spacing Jeff Eastman Building Envelope: Home Inspection and Commercial Inspection 1 10-28-2007 11:04 AM
Early Radon Mitigation System Bruce Breedlove Environmental, Pests, Health and Safety: Home Inspection and Commercial Inspection 6 07-29-2007 04:25 PM
Minnesota Requires Radon Mitigation In New Homes Bruce Breedlove Environmental, Pests, Health and Safety: Home Inspection and Commercial Inspection 3 05-10-2007 06:59 PM
Improper flahing method? Ron Bishop Roofing System: Home Inspection and Commercial Inspection 5 04-14-2007 12:17 PM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:41 PM.


Design by Vjacheslav Trushkin.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8
vB.Sponsors
All Rights Reserved. Hann Tech Marketing Link / InspectionNews.com / InspectionNews.net - No part of InspectionNews.net may be reproduced in any way, or by any means, without the prior written permission of InspectionNews.net. Use of any index or listing Software for the purpose of constructing a mailing list, creating promotional materials or producing a printed or electronic catalog of any kind is expressly forbidden without the prior written permission of InspectionNews.net - All text, graphics and design on InspectionNews.net is copyright by Hann Tech Marketing Links.
Ad Management by RedTyger