InspectionNews - Home Inspection



Welcome to the InspectionNews - Home Inspection forums.

You are currently viewing InspectionNews as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions but not pictures. There are over 6,300 inspectors who have already joined. By joining InspectionNews you will be able to see the pictures, have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast and simple so please, join InspectionNews today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Why join InspectionNews? Read the Testimonials
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 09-18-2007, 02:39 PM
Sean Bacon Sean Bacon is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Chicago
Posts: 39
Can this be saved or should it be torn down?
Came across this during an inspection this morning. Bank Foreclosed property, approximately 10-15 year old frame addition (because it has metal siding) in the rear of a masonry home (at this point no idea if it was done by permit). There was significant termite damage noted at the sill plates and lower studs of at least three walls up through the to the second floor windows. In addition, the slab that it was built on sloped to ground level from a point of about 3" (front to rear). Mold noted along lower portion of walls. Also, they appeared to use sheetrock on the outside of the studs where normally plywood or OSB would be? Was this a general practice back then? I know that we don't determine how this should be repaired, but for my own knowledge, Can this be repaired or should it be razed and redone. My initial thinking is with slab height being inadequate for a structure, moisture intrusion would always be a problem. As well as, the significant termite damage might make it necessary for extensive repairs.


Thanks for any comments.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 101_7209.jpg (40.9 KB, 57 views)
File Type: jpg 101_7379.jpg (58.9 KB, 44 views)
File Type: jpg 101_7382.jpg (47.2 KB, 40 views)
File Type: jpg 101_7381.jpg (48.2 KB, 36 views)
File Type: jpg 101_7384.jpg (47.6 KB, 33 views)
File Type: jpg 101_7213.jpg (36.6 KB, 32 views)
File Type: jpg 101_7215.jpg (32.6 KB, 33 views)
File Type: jpg 101_7226.jpg (37.9 KB, 30 views)
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 09-18-2007, 03:14 PM
Richard Rushing's Avatar
Richard Rushing Richard Rushing is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Duncanville, Tx
Posts: 1,086
Re: Can this be saved or should it be torn down?
Can this be saved? Probably... but why would anyone want to put good money after bad?

Wood rot, poor construction, poor flashing, bad materials, mold, termites.... this thing has it all.

There are only 5 things that can cause a problem:
Materials, Methods, Man-power, Machinery, Management--- this one is 5 for 5! Tear-er down, say I.

rr
__________________
"If con is the opposite of pro, is Congress the opposite of progress?"
Richard Rushing, HCRI
Duncanville, Tx.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 09-18-2007, 03:18 PM
Rick Hurst's Avatar
Rick Hurst Rick Hurst is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Rockwall Texas
Posts: 2,396
Re: Can this be saved or should it be torn down?
Why spend good money dressing up a turd?

Put it out of its misery. I'm sure the neighbors won't mind a bit.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 09-18-2007, 05:16 PM
Richard Rushing's Avatar
Richard Rushing Richard Rushing is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Duncanville, Tx
Posts: 1,086
Re: Can this be saved or should it be torn down?
In the Army we had an old saying.... "You can't polish a turd"

No matter how hard you rub or polish, it's still a piece of shee!!t.
__________________
"If con is the opposite of pro, is Congress the opposite of progress?"
Richard Rushing, HCRI
Duncanville, Tx.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 09-18-2007, 05:25 PM
Jim Luttrall Jim Luttrall is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 1,579
Re: Can this be saved or should it be torn down?
Sean, the addition should come down.
The "Sheetrock" is likely exterior grade gypsum sheathing. Common for use behind brick and other sidings. I think it is still used today in commercial construction.
Jim
__________________
Jim Luttrall
Mr. Inspector.net, Inc.
Allen, Texas 75002
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 09-18-2007, 10:03 PM
Jon Randolph Jon Randolph is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Indianapolis, Indiana
Posts: 342
Re: Can this be saved or should it be torn down?
I disagree with most. Everything can be repaired with pockets that are deep enough. If you like the design and everything, just replace the defective parts with new and you should be good for another 5-10 years before you have to re-do it again. Just think of the knowledge that you can pick up and make it easier the next time. You can even save money if you don't treat the WDI. That will help you re-live the experience even quicker.

On the other hand, if you don't want to keep spending money trying to make a turd look good, tearing it down, treating for the WDI and re-building would be prudent.
__________________
Integrity Inspection Service, LLC
www.irsindy.com
(317) 345-1828
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 09-18-2007, 10:20 PM
Sean Bacon Sean Bacon is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Chicago
Posts: 39
Re: Can this be saved or should it be torn down?
Guys, thanks for the responses...
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:50 PM.


Design by Vjacheslav Trushkin.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8
vB.Sponsors
All Rights Reserved. Hann Tech Marketing Link / InspectionNews.com / InspectionNews.net - No part of InspectionNews.net may be reproduced in any way, or by any means, without the prior written permission of InspectionNews.net. Use of any index or listing Software for the purpose of constructing a mailing list, creating promotional materials or producing a printed or electronic catalog of any kind is expressly forbidden without the prior written permission of InspectionNews.net - All text, graphics and design on InspectionNews.net is copyright by Hann Tech Marketing Links.
Ad Management by RedTyger