<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
	<channel>
		<title>InspectionNews - Home Inspection - Electrical Systems: Home Inspection and Commercial Inspection</title>
		<link>http://www.inspectionnews.net/home_inspection</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Service Conductors, Panels, Overcurrent Protection Devices, Wiring Types and Methods, Switches, Receptacles, Light Fixtures ... For Home Inspections & Commercial Inspections]]></description>
		<language>en</language>
		<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 21:03:54 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>vBulletin</generator>
		<ttl>1440</ttl>
		
		<item>
			<title>Mfg Home electrical panel</title>
			<link>http://www.inspectionnews.net/home_inspection/electrical-systems-home-inspection-commercial-inspection/16587-mfg-home-electrical-panel.html</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 23:30:33 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>Did inspection on mfg home today and in electrical panel found main ground wire bonded to neutrals??? nothing to grounds and was not bonded togeather. Was not sure what to do so said I would follow up about this. In the picture the ground wire is at bottom and feeds to the right and is on the netural bar.
 
Len Couey</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Did inspection on mfg home today and in electrical panel found main ground wire bonded to neutrals??? nothing to grounds and was not bonded togeather. Was not sure what to do so said I would follow up about this. In the picture the ground wire is at bottom and feeds to the right and is on the netural bar.<br />
 <br />
Len Couey</div>


	<br />
	<div style="padding:4px">
	
	

	
	
	
		<fieldset class="fieldset">
			<legend>Attached Images</legend>
			<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="3" border="0">
			<tr>
	<td><img class="inlineimg" src="http://www.inspectionnews.net/home_inspection/images/attach/jpg.gif" alt="File Type: jpg" width="16" height="16" border="0" style="vertical-align:baseline" /></td>
	<td><a href="http://www.inspectionnews.net/home_inspection/attachments/electrical-systems-home-inspection-commercial-inspection/14994d1258586968-mfg-home-electrical-panel-electrical-problem.jpg" target="_blank">electrical problem.jpg</a> (86.3 KB)</td>
</tr>
			</table>
			</fieldset>
	
	
	
	
	</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.inspectionnews.net/home_inspection/electrical-systems-home-inspection-commercial-inspection/">Electrical Systems: Home Inspection and Commercial Inspection</category>
			<dc:creator>Len Couey</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.inspectionnews.net/home_inspection/electrical-systems-home-inspection-commercial-inspection/16587-mfg-home-electrical-panel.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>neutral at a/c disconnect</title>
			<link>http://www.inspectionnews.net/home_inspection/electrical-systems-home-inspection-commercial-inspection/16572-neutral-c-disconnect.html</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 15:07:21 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[This house has a panel downstream of the service entrance being used as the service disconnect for the air conditoner condensers. The disconnect switches in this panel are also the over current protection for the a/c units (two properly sized circuit breakers). There is another larger circuit breaker at the se panel that provides the protection for this panel. I know that here typically is no neutral for 240 branches for a/c units. My question is, with this panel being used not only as a service disconnect but also over current protection, should the neutral feed from the se panel be connected to an isolated bus? With the overcurrent protection, does the panel at this point become a "sub-panel" (sorry Jerry) requiring four wire service? They have cut the neutral off and taped it up, see photo below.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>This house has a panel downstream of the service entrance being used as the service disconnect for the air conditoner condensers. The disconnect switches in this panel are also the over current protection for the a/c units (two properly sized circuit breakers). There is another larger circuit breaker at the se panel that provides the protection for this panel. I know that here typically is no neutral for 240 branches for a/c units. My question is, with this panel being used not only as a service disconnect but also over current protection, should the neutral feed from the se panel be connected to an isolated bus? With the overcurrent protection, does the panel at this point become a &quot;sub-panel&quot; (sorry Jerry) requiring four wire service? They have cut the neutral off and taped it up, see photo below.</div>


	<br />
	<div style="padding:4px">
	
	

	
	
	
		<fieldset class="fieldset">
			<legend>Attached Images</legend>
			<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="3" border="0">
			<tr>
	<td><img class="inlineimg" src="http://www.inspectionnews.net/home_inspection/images/attach/jpg.gif" alt="File Type: jpg" width="16" height="16" border="0" style="vertical-align:baseline" /></td>
	<td><a href="http://www.inspectionnews.net/home_inspection/attachments/electrical-systems-home-inspection-commercial-inspection/14989d1258556507-neutral-c-disconnect-ps-032.jpg" target="_blank">ps 032.jpg</a> (141.4 KB)</td>
</tr>
			</table>
			</fieldset>
	
	
	
	
	</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.inspectionnews.net/home_inspection/electrical-systems-home-inspection-commercial-inspection/">Electrical Systems: Home Inspection and Commercial Inspection</category>
			<dc:creator>Eric Shuman</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.inspectionnews.net/home_inspection/electrical-systems-home-inspection-commercial-inspection/16572-neutral-c-disconnect.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Question RE: UL 489</title>
			<link>http://www.inspectionnews.net/home_inspection/electrical-systems-home-inspection-commercial-inspection/16564-question-re-ul-489-a.html</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 05:43:22 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[*The UL 489 Standard allows for two types of 
ratings. Standard circuit breakers cannot exceed 
a maximum of 50°C temperature rise at the wire 
terminal connection at 100%current in 40°C open 
air. 100% rated circuit breakers may have a 
temperature rise of 60°C at the wire terminal 
connection in the smallest allowable enclosure if 
the circuit breakers are connected with wire rated 
at 90°C wiring insulation sized to the 75°C chart *

Just wondering when they speak of "rise", are they referring to the CB being at a 40 degree C exterior ambient temp and then allowing a 50 degree C rise?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><b><i>The UL 489 Standard allows for two types of <br />
ratings. Standard circuit breakers cannot exceed <br />
a maximum of 50°C temperature rise at the wire <br />
terminal connection at 100%current in 40°C open <br />
air. 100% rated circuit breakers may have a <br />
temperature rise of 60°C at the wire terminal <br />
connection in the smallest allowable enclosure if <br />
the circuit breakers are connected with wire rated <br />
at 90°C wiring insulation sized to the 75°C chart </i></b><br />
<br />
Just wondering when they speak of &quot;rise&quot;, are they referring to the CB being at a 40 degree C exterior ambient temp and then allowing a 50 degree C rise?</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.inspectionnews.net/home_inspection/electrical-systems-home-inspection-commercial-inspection/">Electrical Systems: Home Inspection and Commercial Inspection</category>
			<dc:creator>Marc M</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.inspectionnews.net/home_inspection/electrical-systems-home-inspection-commercial-inspection/16564-question-re-ul-489-a.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Tamper Resistant  Receptacles</title>
			<link>http://www.inspectionnews.net/home_inspection/electrical-systems-home-inspection-commercial-inspection/16557-tamper-resistant-receptacles.html</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 02:07:33 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[I know we discussed this in another thread recently, But I have recently come across the facts from the expert who helped write the section of code being discussed. I wanted to pass this information along so we all can continue to learn:) 
 
There seems to be some confusion as to where tamper resistant receptacles are required bt the NEC.
 
Some are under the impression that tamper resistant receptacles are not required in cabinets , like those for microwaves, dishwasher, and disposals,
and they are not required on receptacles over 5 1/2' off the floor like the garage door operator outlet.
 
In this months IAEI ( International Association of Electrical Inspectors) magazine this topic is discussed in the "Focus on the Code" section. A person wrote in asking about Tamper Resistant receptacles in a soffit, in cabinets and garage door openers. 
 
This is the abridged version,( I will scan it and post the article later this week) The Bold print is direct quotes from the article's writer, underlining is mine.
 
Tamper Resistant receptacles are required in All areas specified in article 210.52. *" This language clearly indicates that all receptacles in the areas specified in 210.52 are required to be tamper resistant.This includes those receptacles specifically required by 210.52 as well as _any other receptacles installed in those areas "_*

This includes those installed in cabinets and those over 5 1/2' off the floor. Article 210.52 address's AREAS of the home not specific receptacles. "*Garbage disposals, microwaves, and diswashers are in a kitchen which are mentioned in article 210.52(B) must be tamper resistant."*
 
*"soffits are covered by 210.52(E) Outdoors or by 210.52(A) General*
 
*"Garages are covered under 210.52 (G) so the garage door opener receptacleis required to be tamper resistant as are other receptacles installed in the garage"*
 
*"The only receptacles that could possibly be a non-Tamper Resistant are those installed in dedicated mechanical rooms or attics as these rooms are areas not covered by 210.52 unless they are also considered to be habitable rooms of the types listed in 210.52 (A)"*

The person who wrote the article and who I directly quoted is:
Tim Owens. Mr Owens sits on Code Making Panel 18. Code making Panel 18
is the Panel that wrote article 406 .
 
So there we have it from the "horses Mouth", the expert who Knows the intent of the code making panel and where tamper resistant receptacles are to be installed. The issue of " not required in a cabinet, or over 5 1/2' off the floor" is wrong as they ARE required in those locations.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>I know we discussed this in another thread recently, But I have recently come across the facts from the expert who helped write the section of code being discussed. I wanted to pass this information along so we all can continue to learn:) <br />
 <br />
There seems to be some confusion as to where tamper resistant receptacles are required bt the NEC.<br />
 <br />
Some are under the impression that tamper resistant receptacles are not required in cabinets , like those for microwaves, dishwasher, and disposals,<br />
and they are not required on receptacles over 5 1/2' off the floor like the garage door operator outlet.<br />
 <br />
In this months IAEI ( International Association of Electrical Inspectors) magazine this topic is discussed in the &quot;Focus on the Code&quot; section. A person wrote in asking about Tamper Resistant receptacles in a soffit, in cabinets and garage door openers. <br />
 <br />
This is the abridged version,( I will scan it and post the article later this week) The Bold print is direct quotes from the article's writer, underlining is mine.<br />
 <br />
Tamper Resistant receptacles are required in All areas specified in article 210.52. <i><b>&quot; This language clearly indicates that all receptacles in the areas specified in 210.52 are required to be tamper resistant.This includes those receptacles specifically required by 210.52 as well as <u>any other receptacles installed in those areas &quot;</u></b></i><br />
<br />
This includes those installed in cabinets and those over 5 1/2' off the floor. Article 210.52 address's AREAS of the home not specific receptacles. &quot;<b>Garbage disposals, microwaves, and diswashers are in a kitchen which are mentioned in article 210.52(B) must be tamper resistant.&quot;</b><br />
 <br />
<b>&quot;soffits are covered by 210.52(E) Outdoors or by 210.52(A) General</b><br />
 <br />
<b>&quot;Garages are covered under 210.52 (G) so the garage door opener receptacleis required to be tamper resistant as are other receptacles installed in the garage&quot;</b><br />
 <br />
<b>&quot;<i>The only receptacles that could possibly be a non-Tamper Resistant are those installed in dedicated mechanical rooms or attics as these rooms are areas not covered by 210.52 unless they are also considered to be habitable rooms of the types listed in 210.52 (A)&quot;</i></b><br />
<br />
The person who wrote the article and who I directly quoted is:<br />
Tim Owens. Mr Owens sits on Code Making Panel 18. Code making Panel 18<br />
is the Panel that wrote article 406 .<br />
 <br />
So there we have it from the &quot;horses Mouth&quot;, the expert who Knows the intent of the code making panel and where tamper resistant receptacles are to be installed. The issue of &quot; not required in a cabinet, or over 5 1/2' off the floor&quot; is wrong as they ARE required in those locations.</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.inspectionnews.net/home_inspection/electrical-systems-home-inspection-commercial-inspection/">Electrical Systems: Home Inspection and Commercial Inspection</category>
			<dc:creator>ken horak</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.inspectionnews.net/home_inspection/electrical-systems-home-inspection-commercial-inspection/16557-tamper-resistant-receptacles.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Doorbell tranformer</title>
			<link>http://www.inspectionnews.net/home_inspection/electrical-systems-home-inspection-commercial-inspection/16544-doorbell-tranformer.html</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 14:04:13 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>Does anyone know if a doorbell transformer can be on the inside of an electrical panel? It is common to see then on the outside, but I ran across one bolted to the inside the other day.</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Does anyone know if a doorbell transformer can be on the inside of an electrical panel? It is common to see then on the outside, but I ran across one bolted to the inside the other day.</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.inspectionnews.net/home_inspection/electrical-systems-home-inspection-commercial-inspection/">Electrical Systems: Home Inspection and Commercial Inspection</category>
			<dc:creator>Bob Lynett</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.inspectionnews.net/home_inspection/electrical-systems-home-inspection-commercial-inspection/16544-doorbell-tranformer.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Service Conduit With Expansion Fitting</title>
			<link>http://www.inspectionnews.net/home_inspection/electrical-systems-home-inspection-commercial-inspection/16540-service-conduit-expansion-fitting.html</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 04:36:33 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>This is obviously less than 6 feet in lenght. However, it is subject to extreme temperature changes. Do you recommend an expansion fitting.  It appears there has been previous movement along the joint.</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>This is obviously less than 6 feet in lenght. However, it is subject to extreme temperature changes. Do you recommend an expansion fitting.  It appears there has been previous movement along the joint.</div>


	<br />
	<div style="padding:4px">
	
	

	
	
	
		<fieldset class="fieldset">
			<legend>Attached Images</legend>
			<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="3" border="0">
			<tr>
	<td><img class="inlineimg" src="http://www.inspectionnews.net/home_inspection/images/attach/jpg.gif" alt="File Type: jpg" width="16" height="16" border="0" style="vertical-align:baseline" /></td>
	<td><a href="http://www.inspectionnews.net/home_inspection/attachments/electrical-systems-home-inspection-commercial-inspection/14968d1258432540-service-conduit-expansion-fitting-sdc16496.jpg" target="_blank">SDC16496.jpg</a> (35.1 KB)</td>
</tr>
			</table>
			</fieldset>
	
	
	
	
	</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.inspectionnews.net/home_inspection/electrical-systems-home-inspection-commercial-inspection/">Electrical Systems: Home Inspection and Commercial Inspection</category>
			<dc:creator>mathew stouffer</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.inspectionnews.net/home_inspection/electrical-systems-home-inspection-commercial-inspection/16540-service-conduit-expansion-fitting.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Did a little arc welding today</title>
			<link>http://www.inspectionnews.net/home_inspection/electrical-systems-home-inspection-commercial-inspection/16535-did-little-arc-welding-today.html</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 01:22:49 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>Tapped the panel before I touched it. OK
Started taking out the screws. Got to the middle one and ZAAPPPPP!
After I took off the cover I saw a wire was pinched between the screw and the side of the panel and the insulation was worn thru.
Fun times.</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Tapped the panel before I touched it. OK<br />
Started taking out the screws. Got to the middle one and ZAAPPPPP!<br />
After I took off the cover I saw a wire was pinched between the screw and the side of the panel and the insulation was worn thru.<br />
Fun times.</div>


	<br />
	<div style="padding:4px">
	
	

	
	
	
		<fieldset class="fieldset">
			<legend>Attached Images</legend>
			<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="3" border="0">
			<tr>
	<td><img class="inlineimg" src="http://www.inspectionnews.net/home_inspection/images/attach/jpg.gif" alt="File Type: jpg" width="16" height="16" border="0" style="vertical-align:baseline" /></td>
	<td><a href="http://www.inspectionnews.net/home_inspection/attachments/electrical-systems-home-inspection-commercial-inspection/14961d1258420954-did-little-arc-welding-today-p1000172.jpg" target="_blank">P1000172.JPG</a> (77.5 KB)</td>
</tr><tr>
	<td><img class="inlineimg" src="http://www.inspectionnews.net/home_inspection/images/attach/jpg.gif" alt="File Type: jpg" width="16" height="16" border="0" style="vertical-align:baseline" /></td>
	<td><a href="http://www.inspectionnews.net/home_inspection/attachments/electrical-systems-home-inspection-commercial-inspection/14962d1258420954-did-little-arc-welding-today-p1000173.jpg" target="_blank">P1000173.JPG</a> (89.4 KB)</td>
</tr><tr>
	<td><img class="inlineimg" src="http://www.inspectionnews.net/home_inspection/images/attach/jpg.gif" alt="File Type: jpg" width="16" height="16" border="0" style="vertical-align:baseline" /></td>
	<td><a href="http://www.inspectionnews.net/home_inspection/attachments/electrical-systems-home-inspection-commercial-inspection/14963d1258420954-did-little-arc-welding-today-p1000176.jpg" target="_blank">P1000176.JPG</a> (84.9 KB)</td>
</tr>
			</table>
			</fieldset>
	
	
	
	
	</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.inspectionnews.net/home_inspection/electrical-systems-home-inspection-commercial-inspection/">Electrical Systems: Home Inspection and Commercial Inspection</category>
			<dc:creator>Jack Feldmann</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.inspectionnews.net/home_inspection/electrical-systems-home-inspection-commercial-inspection/16535-did-little-arc-welding-today.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Cutler Hammer cross reference</title>
			<link>http://www.inspectionnews.net/home_inspection/electrical-systems-home-inspection-commercial-inspection/16516-cutler-hammer-cross-reference.html</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 05:44:32 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[Finally found something that clears up one question - Can Cutler Hammer BR breakers be used in the older panels? These letters from the UL say YES! :)

   This one is a letter from UL:
http://www.eaton.com/ecm/idcplg?IdcS...=1016115403174 (http://www.eaton.com/ecm/idcplg?IdcService=GET_FILE&allowInterrupt=1&RevisionSelectionMethod=LatestReleased&Rendition=Primary&&dDocName=1016115403174)

This one if a cross reference for larger breakers:
http://www.eaton.com/ecm/idcplg?IdcS...=1060734795662 (http://www.eaton.com/ecm/idcplg?IdcService=GET_FILE&allowInterrupt=1&RevisionSelectionMethod=LatestReleased&Rendition=Primary&&dDocName=1060734795662)

This document is a cross reference chart:
http://www.eaton.com/ecm/idcplg?IdcS...=1081453631966 (http://www.eaton.com/ecm/idcplg?IdcService=GET_FILE&allowInterrupt=1&RevisionSelectionMethod=LatestReleased&Rendition=Primary&&dDocName=1081453631966)
   
I know, I know, it can't be that simple. There's still questions like this one below - the Seimens breaker in this Cutler panel. This is new construction and was supposedly inspected and approved. The label says use only CH breakers. Go figure. :confused: They say warranty is void with that other breaker, but on their website, they say the AHJ has the final say. Does that mean there is a warranty after all?  :confused::confused:

The last pic is of a panel that I think the UL says is OK, a 1958 Westinghouse panel with a new CH BR series breaker.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Finally found something that clears up one question - Can Cutler Hammer BR breakers be used in the older panels? These letters from the UL say YES! :)<br />
<br />
   This one is a letter from UL:<br />
<a href="http://www.eaton.com/ecm/idcplg?IdcService=GET_FILE&amp;allowInterrupt=1&amp;RevisionSelectionMethod=LatestReleased&amp;Rendition=Primary&amp;&amp;dDocName=1016115403174" target="_blank">http://www.eaton.com/ecm/idcplg?IdcS...=1016115403174</a><br />
<br />
This one if a cross reference for larger breakers:<br />
<a href="http://www.eaton.com/ecm/idcplg?IdcService=GET_FILE&amp;allowInterrupt=1&amp;RevisionSelectionMethod=LatestReleased&amp;Rendition=Primary&amp;&amp;dDocName=1060734795662" target="_blank">http://www.eaton.com/ecm/idcplg?IdcS...=1060734795662</a><br />
<br />
This document is a cross reference chart:<br />
<a href="http://www.eaton.com/ecm/idcplg?IdcService=GET_FILE&amp;allowInterrupt=1&amp;RevisionSelectionMethod=LatestReleased&amp;Rendition=Primary&amp;&amp;dDocName=1081453631966" target="_blank">http://www.eaton.com/ecm/idcplg?IdcS...=1081453631966</a><br />
   <br />
I know, I know, it can't be that simple. There's still questions like this one below - the Seimens breaker in this Cutler panel. This is new construction and was supposedly inspected and approved. The label says use only CH breakers. Go figure. :confused: They say warranty is void with that other breaker, but on their website, they say the AHJ has the final say. Does that mean there is a warranty after all?  :confused::confused:<br />
<br />
The last pic is of a panel that <i>I think</i> the UL says is OK, a 1958 Westinghouse panel with a new CH BR series breaker.</div>


	<br />
	<div style="padding:4px">
	
	

	
	
	
		<fieldset class="fieldset">
			<legend>Attached Images</legend>
			<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="3" border="0">
			<tr>
	<td><img class="inlineimg" src="http://www.inspectionnews.net/home_inspection/images/attach/jpg.gif" alt="File Type: jpg" width="16" height="16" border="0" style="vertical-align:baseline" /></td>
	<td><a href="http://www.inspectionnews.net/home_inspection/attachments/electrical-systems-home-inspection-commercial-inspection/14952d1258350162-cutler-hammer-cross-reference-chpanel.jpg" target="_blank">CHpanel.jpg</a> (28.9 KB)</td>
</tr><tr>
	<td><img class="inlineimg" src="http://www.inspectionnews.net/home_inspection/images/attach/jpg.gif" alt="File Type: jpg" width="16" height="16" border="0" style="vertical-align:baseline" /></td>
	<td><a href="http://www.inspectionnews.net/home_inspection/attachments/electrical-systems-home-inspection-commercial-inspection/14953d1258350162-cutler-hammer-cross-reference-seimens.jpg" target="_blank">seimens.jpg</a> (51.9 KB)</td>
</tr><tr>
	<td><img class="inlineimg" src="http://www.inspectionnews.net/home_inspection/images/attach/jpg.gif" alt="File Type: jpg" width="16" height="16" border="0" style="vertical-align:baseline" /></td>
	<td><a href="http://www.inspectionnews.net/home_inspection/attachments/electrical-systems-home-inspection-commercial-inspection/14954d1258350162-cutler-hammer-cross-reference-label.jpg" target="_blank">label.jpg</a> (63.1 KB)</td>
</tr><tr>
	<td><img class="inlineimg" src="http://www.inspectionnews.net/home_inspection/images/attach/jpg.gif" alt="File Type: jpg" width="16" height="16" border="0" style="vertical-align:baseline" /></td>
	<td><a href="http://www.inspectionnews.net/home_inspection/attachments/electrical-systems-home-inspection-commercial-inspection/14957d1258411926-cutler-hammer-cross-reference-panel3.jpg" target="_blank">panel3.jpg</a> (72.0 KB)</td>
</tr>
			</table>
			</fieldset>
	
	
	
	
	</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.inspectionnews.net/home_inspection/electrical-systems-home-inspection-commercial-inspection/">Electrical Systems: Home Inspection and Commercial Inspection</category>
			<dc:creator>John Kogel</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.inspectionnews.net/home_inspection/electrical-systems-home-inspection-commercial-inspection/16516-cutler-hammer-cross-reference.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>AFCI breaker new 2006</title>
			<link>http://www.inspectionnews.net/home_inspection/electrical-systems-home-inspection-commercial-inspection/16511-afci-breaker-new-2006-a.html</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 21:22:10 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[Does anyone out there if you can still install AFCI breakers, such as one
that was new in 2006, and never been installed.
 
There are electrician out there that haven't used up there stock.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Does anyone out there if you can still install AFCI breakers, such as one<br />
that was new in 2006, and never been installed.<br />
 <br />
There are electrician out there that haven't used up there stock.</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.inspectionnews.net/home_inspection/electrical-systems-home-inspection-commercial-inspection/">Electrical Systems: Home Inspection and Commercial Inspection</category>
			<dc:creator>Robert S. Mattison</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.inspectionnews.net/home_inspection/electrical-systems-home-inspection-commercial-inspection/16511-afci-breaker-new-2006-a.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Need some info for this panel.</title>
			<link>http://www.inspectionnews.net/home_inspection/electrical-systems-home-inspection-commercial-inspection/16492-need-some-info-panel.html</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 03:31:31 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>Ran into this yesterday but have never seen this before. This serves 2 panels in the garage both 100A each side by side. I assume they are the SEPs.
Any idea are the other center two sets of conductors are for?  There were only the two panels on the property.</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Ran into this yesterday but have never seen this before. This serves 2 panels in the garage both 100A each side by side. I assume they are the SEPs.<br />
Any idea are the other center two sets of conductors are for?  There were only the two panels on the property.</div>


	<br />
	<div style="padding:4px">
	
	

	
	
	
		<fieldset class="fieldset">
			<legend>Attached Images</legend>
			<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="3" border="0">
			<tr>
	<td><img class="inlineimg" src="http://www.inspectionnews.net/home_inspection/images/attach/jpg.gif" alt="File Type: jpg" width="16" height="16" border="0" style="vertical-align:baseline" /></td>
	<td><a href="http://www.inspectionnews.net/home_inspection/attachments/electrical-systems-home-inspection-commercial-inspection/14914d1258169484-need-some-info-panel-picture-175-medium-.jpg" target="_blank">Picture 175 (Medium).jpg</a> (82.3 KB)</td>
</tr><tr>
	<td><img class="inlineimg" src="http://www.inspectionnews.net/home_inspection/images/attach/jpg.gif" alt="File Type: jpg" width="16" height="16" border="0" style="vertical-align:baseline" /></td>
	<td><a href="http://www.inspectionnews.net/home_inspection/attachments/electrical-systems-home-inspection-commercial-inspection/14915d1258169484-need-some-info-panel-picture-176-medium-.jpg" target="_blank">Picture 176 (Medium).jpg</a> (48.1 KB)</td>
</tr>
			</table>
			</fieldset>
	
	
	
	
	</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.inspectionnews.net/home_inspection/electrical-systems-home-inspection-commercial-inspection/">Electrical Systems: Home Inspection and Commercial Inspection</category>
			<dc:creator>Marc M</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.inspectionnews.net/home_inspection/electrical-systems-home-inspection-commercial-inspection/16492-need-some-info-panel.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>SEC back into the meter panel?</title>
			<link>http://www.inspectionnews.net/home_inspection/electrical-systems-home-inspection-commercial-inspection/16481-sec-back-into-meter-panel.html</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 21:07:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>Whole house electrical FUBAR!  Power comes out of the meter on #2 CU and feeds new panel. Then goes back into the meter (which has no tamper seal) on #2 CU.  I think it is spliced to #4 ALU inside the meter which goes to the original main panel inside the house.  As I said everything else is wrong, how wrong is this part?</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Whole house electrical FUBAR!  Power comes out of the meter on #2 CU and feeds new panel. Then goes back into the meter (which has no tamper seal) on #2 CU.  I think it is spliced to #4 ALU inside the meter which goes to the original main panel inside the house.  As I said everything else is wrong, how wrong is this part?</div>


	<br />
	<div style="padding:4px">
	
	

	
	
	
		<fieldset class="fieldset">
			<legend>Attached Images</legend>
			<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="3" border="0">
			<tr>
	<td><img class="inlineimg" src="http://www.inspectionnews.net/home_inspection/images/attach/jpg.gif" alt="File Type: jpg" width="16" height="16" border="0" style="vertical-align:baseline" /></td>
	<td><a href="http://www.inspectionnews.net/home_inspection/attachments/electrical-systems-home-inspection-commercial-inspection/14874d1258146390-sec-back-into-meter-panel-091113miz-031.jpg" target="_blank">091113miz 031.jpg</a> (52.5 KB)</td>
</tr><tr>
	<td><img class="inlineimg" src="http://www.inspectionnews.net/home_inspection/images/attach/jpg.gif" alt="File Type: jpg" width="16" height="16" border="0" style="vertical-align:baseline" /></td>
	<td><a href="http://www.inspectionnews.net/home_inspection/attachments/electrical-systems-home-inspection-commercial-inspection/14875d1258146390-sec-back-into-meter-panel-091113miz-037.jpg" target="_blank">091113miz 037.jpg</a> (49.8 KB)</td>
</tr>
			</table>
			</fieldset>
	
	
	
	
	</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.inspectionnews.net/home_inspection/electrical-systems-home-inspection-commercial-inspection/">Electrical Systems: Home Inspection and Commercial Inspection</category>
			<dc:creator>Vern Heiler</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.inspectionnews.net/home_inspection/electrical-systems-home-inspection-commercial-inspection/16481-sec-back-into-meter-panel.html</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
