InspectionNews - Home Inspection


Share |

Welcome to InspectionNews.

Registration is FREE!

Why join InspectionNews? Read the Testimonials

You are currently viewing InspectionNews as a guest which gives you limited access to view some discussions but you will not see any of the pictures or technical bulletins that have been uploaded.

There are over 11,850 inspectors who have already joined InspectionNews, contributing over 100,700 posts. By joining InspectionNews you will be able to see the pictures, start new threads, reply to posts, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features.

If you are an inspector or thinking about becoming one, InspectionNews is the place for you.

Registration is FREE because the sponsors pay your way.
Please visit all the sponsors often and let them know that you found them on InspectionNews!

How much should an inspection cost? Click the banner below to find out.
The Cost Of Business

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Registration is easy, so please Join InspectionNews Today!

FIRE SERVICE
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 07-30-2010, 01:56 PM
Marc M's Avatar
Marc M Marc M is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: California
Posts: 343
Need an opinion from a sweep...
I came across this vent termination in a housing track built in 1988, which all of the houses were identical. The box is a majestic MBUC36 and the instructions that i could locate do not show this type of termination, it just shows a cap. So my question is, should there be a separation of the debris flue and cooling flues within this shroud? And / or is the cooling system too close to the debris flue (center flue).
Attached Images
File Type: jpg code 066 (Large).jpg (37.1 KB, 31 views)
__________________
If you can read this, thank a TEACHER
If you can read this in ENGLISH, thank a VET!
Reply With Quote
Are inspection referrals from past clients important to you? If so, click here to get even more referrals!
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 08-02-2010, 02:59 PM
Stephen Tilleux Stephen Tilleux is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: San Luis Obispo
Posts: 1
Re: Need an opinion from a sweep...
I can not see the rest of the chase top but that looks like a improperly installed decorative chase top.

To meet the standard in my area there would need to be a cap inside of a listed decorative shroud, it would need to be big enough to have clearance for the cap from the inside of the shroud and the chimney would need to extend above the chase top an amount determined by the chimney manufacture (6"-12" usually) and other details clearances etc. In other words installed as per the listing and instructions.

My copy of NFPA 211 spells out "3-1.4 Decorative shrouds at the termination of a factory-built chimney shall not be permitted.
Exception: Decorative shrouds listed for use with the specific factory-built chimney system."

In my area we have had a few chase fires and the FD has been telling whole subdivisions to not use there fireplaces until these shrouds are removed and replaced with proper caps with clearance etc.

That said I am not a sweep but a licensed fireplace installer, solid fuel tech, ymmv.
Enjoy
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 08-02-2010, 03:02 PM
Marc M's Avatar
Marc M Marc M is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: California
Posts: 343
Re: Need an opinion from a sweep...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stephen Tilleux View Post
I can not see the rest of the chase top but that looks like a improperly installed decorative chase top.

To meet the standard in my area there would need to be a cap inside of a listed decorative shroud, it would need to be big enough to have clearance for the cap from the inside of the shroud and the chimney would need to extend above the chase top an amount determined by the chimney manufacture (6"-12" usually) and other details clearances etc. In other words installed as per the listing and instructions.

My copy of NFPA 211 spells out "3-1.4 Decorative shrouds at the termination of a factory-built chimney shall not be permitted.
Exception: Decorative shrouds listed for use with the specific factory-built chimney system."

In my area we have had a few chase fires and the FD has been telling whole subdivisions to not use there fireplaces until these shrouds are removed and replaced with proper caps with clearance etc.

That said I am not a sweep but a licensed fireplace installer, solid fuel tech, ymmv.
Enjoy
Great information, thanks for your time.
__________________
If you can read this, thank a TEACHER
If you can read this in ENGLISH, thank a VET!
Reply With Quote
Are inspection referrals from past clients important to you?
If so, click here to get even more referrals!
FIRE SERVICE
Reply

Share |

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Need an opinion on this pic Marc M Electrical Systems: Home Inspection and Commercial Inspection 7 05-16-2010 06:02 AM
A second opinion Dan Harris General Chit Chat: Home Inspectors & Commercial Inspectors 2 08-09-2009 02:14 PM
Need an opinion Kevin Luce Roofing System: Home Inspection and Commercial Inspection 2 02-09-2008 05:19 PM
Always get an second opinion. Paul Hollup Introductions By New Members 5 12-11-2007 08:27 PM
chimney sweep challenge John Arnold Fireplaces, Chimneys and Solid Fuel Burning Appliances: Home Inspection and Commercial Inspection 0 08-20-2007 06:03 AM

Alabama | Alaska | Arizona | Atlanta | Aurora | Austin | Baltimore | Boston | California | Cambridge | Cape Coral | Chandler | Charlotte | Chicago | Cincinnati | Clarksville | Cleveland | Colorado | Columbus | Connecticut | Dallas | Delaware | Denver | Detroit | Durham | El Paso | Eugene | Florida | Fort Worth | Fresno | Georgia | Gilbert | Hawaii | Henderson | Houston | Huntsville | Idaho | Illinois | Indiana | Indianapolis | Irvine | Jacksonville | Joliet | Kansas City | Knoxville | Lancaster | Las Vegas | Los Angeles | Louisiana | Louisville | Maine | Maryland | Massachusetts | Memphis | Mesa | Miami | Michigan | Milwaukee | Minneapolis | Minnesota | Miramar | Mississippi | Missouri | Montana | Nashville | Nebraska | Nevada | New Hampshire | New Jersey | New Mexico | New York | North Carolina | North Dakota | Oakland | Ohio | Oklahoma | Omaha | Ontario | Orange | Oregon | Orlando | Pennsylvania | Philadelphia | Phoenix | Pittsburgh | Plano | Portland | Port StLucie | Raleigh | Rhode Island | Roseville | Sacramento | Salem | San Antonio | San Diego | San Francisco | San Jose | Scottsdale | Seattle | Sioux falls | South Carolina | South Dakota | St Louis | Tampa | Tennessee | Texas | Thornton | Toledo | Tucson | Tulsa | Utah | Vancouver | Vermont | Virginia | West Virginia | Wichita | Wisconsin | Wyoming | Cost To Repair

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:19 PM.


Design by Vjacheslav Trushkin.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8
vB.Sponsors
All Rights Reserved. Hann Tech Marketing Link / InspectionNews.com / InspectionNews.net - No part of InspectionNews.net may be reproduced in any way, or by any means, without the prior written permission of InspectionNews.net. Use of any index or listing Software for the purpose of constructing a mailing list, creating promotional materials or producing a printed or electronic catalog of any kind is expressly forbidden without the prior written permission of InspectionNews.net - All text, graphics and design on InspectionNews.net is copyright by Hann Tech Marketing Links.
Ad Management by RedTyger