Results 1 to 5 of 5
-
05-16-2011, 04:00 AM #1
building cost: attached vs detached
What's more expensive to build: detached or attached housing, all other things being equal?
Similar Threads:"There is no exception to the rule that every rule has an exception." -James Thurber, writer and cartoonist (1894-1961)
www.ArnoldHomeInspections.com
-
05-16-2011, 04:59 AM #2
Re: building cost: attached vs detached
Attached.
Less foundation, fewer walls, fewer windows, roof requires less time to install, wast and water to unit can be less and the list goes on.
-
05-16-2011, 05:13 AM #3
Re: building cost: attached vs detached
"There is no exception to the rule that every rule has an exception." -James Thurber, writer and cartoonist (1894-1961)
www.ArnoldHomeInspections.com
-
05-16-2011, 10:31 AM #4
Re: building cost: attached vs detached
I was hoping you would make correlation.
Attached less expensive.
Detached more Expensive.
-
05-16-2011, 01:01 PM #5
Re: building cost: attached vs detached
No counter-intuitive opinions?
"There is no exception to the rule that every rule has an exception." -James Thurber, writer and cartoonist (1894-1961)
www.ArnoldHomeInspections.com
Bookmarks