Results 1 to 18 of 18
Thread: bottom line...
-
10-06-2014, 06:31 PM #1
-
10-06-2014, 06:33 PM #2
Hi Janet Rutkowski and welcome to InspectionNews!
I hope you find everything you are looking for on this site.
If I can help you in any way just let me know.
If you are a business owner please accept this gift for making your first post: http://www.inspectionreferral.com
If you are a home buyer, seller or DIYer, this gift is for you: http://www.inspectionnews.net/home-i...als/member.php
View The List Of InspectionNews Member Benefits!
-----------------
Sincerely,
Brian Hannigan
InspectionNews.net / InspectionReferral.com
Helping Inspectors $ucceed Since 1997TM
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/InspectionNews
Twitter: @InspectionNews
-
10-06-2014, 06:57 PM #3
Re: bottom line...
The most widely used building code, International Residential Code, does not require closets in bedrooms. The code refers to them as sleeping rooms, not bedrooms.
Real Estate agents typically want a room to have a closet before they will call it a bedroom. Homes with more bedrooms sell for higher prices than homes with fewer bedrooms. Adding a closet to a room does not make it a bedroom. Often homeowners will add closets to rooms in an effort to make their home sells for more because they have more bedrooms.
From a code viewpoint, bedrooms require 8% natural light, 4% ventilation, a smoke alarm, and an emergency egress directly to the exterior without passing through another room or space. Closets are not specified as to type, size, location or need.
Ask the builders to quote the chapter, section and subsection that requires a bedroom to have a closet. They won't be able to because there is not requirement. Put the burden back on them.
"The Code is not a peak to reach but a foundation to build from."
-
10-07-2014, 06:01 AM #4
Re: bottom line...
Appraisers want to see closets if the comparable homes in the area have them. With older homes(100+) it is very common to not see closets.
-
10-07-2014, 07:09 AM #5
-
10-07-2014, 09:57 AM #6
Re: bottom line...
-
10-07-2014, 10:56 AM #7
Re: bottom line...
A sleeping room is a room intended for sleeping, and being as most people sleep on beds, those same sleeping rooms are known as bedrooms.
The codes use the term "sleeping room" so that people can't call it something else (such as a "guest room") and therefore it is not a "bedroom" and therefore would not have to meet the requirements for a "bedroom". If the room is intended for sleeping, regardless of whether there is a closet or not, and regardless of what other name one may put on it, that room is required to meet the requirements for "sleeping rooms", i.e.: smoke detectors inside and outside, EERO, etc.. The codes do not make mention of, or require, a closet.
Older homes ... from eons ago ... did not have "closets", the occupants used furniture such as "wardrobes", "armoires", and the like for storing their clothes.
A living room is not a "sleeping room" (even though many people sleep in living rooms) because the living room is not intended as a place for sleeping.
The basic premise is that ... bad things can happen when you are sleeping, and when you are sleeping and bad things happen - you need extra time to get yourself oriented and be able to get to heck out of the "sleeping room". Whereas in a living room, family room, kitchen, etc., the occupants are already awake and should be able sense that bad things are either going to happen or sense that bad things are happening sooner and can therefore get to heck out quicker and with less delay.
Is there a difference between a "sleeping room" and a "bedroom"? No, not really ... but will some real estate agents try to make one "worth more" than the other? If you don't know the answer to that without having to pause and think about it ... Houston, we have a problem ....
BOTH rooms would be required to meet the minimum size (area) and dimensions required for sleeping rooms/bedrooms.
-
10-07-2014, 01:36 PM #8
Re: bottom line...
Maybe that is why you are no longer a CMI? Not able to do math so you accept a space which is 5 ft by 8 ft as being a bedroom?
Let's see what that closet of yours is called in the IRC: (bold and underlining are mine)
- SECTION R304 MINIMUM ROOM AREAS - - R304.1 Minimum area.
- - - Every dwelling unit shall have at least one habitable room that shall have not less than 120 square feet (11 m2) of gross floor area.
- - R304.2 Other rooms.
- - - Other habitable rooms shall have a floor area of not less than 70 square feet (6.5 m2).
- - - - Exception: Kitchens.
- - R304.3 Minimum dimensions.
- - - Habitable rooms shall not be less than 7 feet (2134 mm) in any horizontal dimension.
- - - - Exception: Kitchens.
Now, if my math is right, a space which is 5ft by 8 ft does not meet R304.2 which requires a minimum area of "not less than 70 square feet" ... 5 ft by 8 ft = 40.sq ft ...
Also, if my math is right, that space which is 5 ft by 8 ft does not meet R304.2 which requires the shortest dimension to "not be less than 7 feet" ... 5 ft by - wait a minute - "5 ft" is less than 7 ft ...
-
10-07-2014, 01:45 PM #9
Re: bottom line...
-
10-08-2014, 04:19 PM #10
Re: bottom line...
Ontario Building Code - comments on bedroom/sleeping room.....
-
10-08-2014, 05:31 PM #11
Re: bottom line...
Doing the conversion, the 5 ft by 8 ft bedroom equals 3.716 sq meters, the minimum is stated as 7 sq meters for bedrooms in dwelling units which are not the master bedroom.
Converting the IRC 7 ft min and 70 sq ft min equals 6.5 sq meters, which makes the 7 sq meter size in Ontario slightly larger than the IRC requirement.
The above is if I did my conversions correctly.
-
10-09-2014, 06:25 AM #12
Re: bottom line...
-
10-09-2014, 07:00 AM #13
Re: bottom line...
"Sleeping rooms ... " " ... other than in ... " " ... dwelling units. "
AND
" ... 4.6 my per person ... " " ... for multiple occupancy"
The minimum size for "other than dwelling units" for multiple occupancy is therefore 9.2 m2 ... not 4.6 m2 - that is for two people, three people would require a larger room.
-
10-09-2014, 10:19 AM #14
Re: bottom line...
-
10-09-2014, 03:53 PM #15
Re: bottom line...
For clarification - my post and reference is the "most" current Ontario Building Code - 2012 edition.
-
10-09-2014, 04:31 PM #16
-
10-09-2014, 09:32 PM #17
Re: bottom line...
I made the mistake once of designing two bedrooms that where 8 x 10. Eight feet is too small a dimension for a furnished bedroom. Kids get bigger and beds have to get bigger.
In fairness to the OP, a bedroom in real estate description has a built in closet. No closet, it will be described as a study or office. Like it or not, that is how the home will be described when you sell it.
You can always add closets. A store-bought cabinet can be attached to a wall with screws.
A closet should be 24" deep so that coat hangers will fit.
I have built a hall closet that was two bifold doors wide but only 18" deep. I installed short poles from the front wall to the back wall so that hangers would fit just fine.
John Kogel, RHI, BC HI Lic #47455
www.allsafehome.ca
-
10-10-2014, 06:07 AM #18
Re: bottom line...
One reason older homes did not have built in closets is that many areas taxed the homeowner on the number of rooms in the house and closets were considered separate rooms because they had a door.
Bookmarks