|
|
|
|
Registration is FREE!... and will get rid of this top message
Welcome to InspectionNews.net.
You are currently viewing InspectionNews as a guest which gives you limited access to view some discussions but none of the pictures.
There are over 9,970 inspectors who have already joined. By joining InspectionNews you will be able to see the pictures, post new topics or reply to others, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features.
Registration is FREE for you because the sponsors pay your way. Please visit the sponsors often and let them know that you found them on InspectionNews!
Registration is FREE, fast and easy so please, join InspectionNews today!
Why join InspectionNews? Read the Testimonials
Looking for Education? We recommend Casey, O'Malley and Associates

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.
|
|

11-06-2009, 03:03 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: bay area, california
Posts: 3
|
|
|
Is this a defective tile?
I inspected a roof yesterday that the roof tile is questionable.
It appears to be a composite type tile (not concrete or wood), and is very brittle. Needless to say, I did the inspection from the roof edge.
The question is, I am trying to identify the type for the buyer. There was a licensed contractor (doesn't say roofer) who gave a 2 year cert after doing repairs ranging $1800. However, in my inspection I still found the following: - Several cracked tiles; and even more patched/caulked tiles
- Several loose hip tiles
- Loose caulking of the roof-to-wall flashing and/or improper installation
- Missing rake tiles (?)
- Hip tiles not sealed at overlapping areas
Does anyone have any idea what type of tiles these are, and possibly how I should write it in my report?
Thanks!
|
|

11-06-2009, 03:35 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Allen, Texas
Posts: 2,497
|
|
|
Re: Is this a defective tile?
Repairs are needed by a competent roofer. Short and sweet. The less said the better in some circumstances.
|
|

11-06-2009, 07:10 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Ormond Beach, Florida
Posts: 14,280
|
|
|
Re: Is this a defective tile?
|
|

11-09-2009, 12:17 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: bay area, california
Posts: 3
|
|
|
Re: Is this a defective tile?
It looks very similar to the American Cemwood tile.
Thank you.
|
|

11-09-2009, 05:25 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Santa Rosa, CA
Posts: 1,198
|
|
|
Re: Is this a defective tile?
Jonathan,
JP is (as usual) correct. I have seen a little of this type of tile. It was a great product, just don't let it get wet.
When I see it, I advise replacement.
__________________
We have enough youth, how about a fountain of Smart?
|
|

11-09-2009, 09:05 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Southern Vancouver Island
Posts: 522
|
|
|
Re: Is this a defective tile?
Originally Posted by Jonathan Park
It looks very similar to the American Cemwood tile.
Thank you.
Jonathan, I think you mean the Permatek shingles in the bottom pic, which have the shiplap-style edges. Cemwood tiles are pictured above, laid with a gap between. Yours are like Permatek, uniform widths, but the laps are reversed, so they may be one of the other brands. Be careful what you say here, and good luck!
|
|

11-11-2009, 10:38 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: South
Posts: 11
|
|
|
Re: Is this a defective tile?
It amazes me how some people call themselves roofers. broken tiles, corrected with NP1, missing rake pieces, missing flashings... Before becoming an inspector, i worked at a roofing supply house and did training on proper roofing installation techniques. We would go to job sites where the "better roofers" were installing and we always found improper techniques. I guess it is the same everywhere.
|
|

11-13-2009, 03:45 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: bay area, california
Posts: 3
|
|
|
Re: Is this a defective tile?
John - Thank you for pointing that out about the tiles being Permatek. But wouldn't they all fall under the umbrella of Cemwood?
I finished the report but didn't say it was Cemwood; just pointed out all that I saw. I referred it to a qualified licensed roofing contractor for further review/evaluation.
Thank you everyone!
|
|

11-17-2009, 12:42 AM
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Antelope Valley, CA
Posts: 22
|
|
|
Re: Is this a defective tile?
There's been a few that I gave a "thumbs up" to, but most of the time someone got in a hurry or similar on a roof.
As we all know, most of the larger losses on a home minus fire, are going to be moisture related. A roof is a good place to start looking. 
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
| Thread |
Thread Starter |
Forum |
Replies |
Last Post |
| tile finish |
Lou Wissner |
Roofing System: Home Inspection and Commercial Inspection |
6 |
12-08-2008 07:53 AM |
| Tile repairs |
Michael Thomas |
Roofing System: Home Inspection and Commercial Inspection |
5 |
04-05-2008 09:22 AM |
| OPEN GROUND Defective or Maintenance |
Lynn Petrie |
General Chit Chat: Home Inspectors & Commercial Inspectors |
2 |
09-17-2007 09:09 PM |
| Any recent recall on defective shingles? |
Terry Beck |
Roofing System: Home Inspection and Commercial Inspection |
0 |
08-15-2007 10:13 PM |
| Possible defective shingles |
Jon mackay |
Roofing System: Home Inspection and Commercial Inspection |
11 |
08-07-2007 05:54 AM |
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:04 PM.
| | |
|