InspectionNews - Home Inspection



Welcome to the InspectionNews - Home Inspection forums.

You are currently viewing InspectionNews as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions but not pictures. There are over 6,300 inspectors who have already joined. By joining InspectionNews you will be able to see the pictures, have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast and simple so please, join InspectionNews today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Why join InspectionNews? Read the Testimonials
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 04-12-2007, 09:17 AM
Ron Bishop
 
Posts: n/a
Improper flahing method?
Is this an improper flashing technique?
Attached Images
File Type: jpg HPIM1191.JPG (99.5 KB, 77 views)
Reply With Quote
Are inspection referrals from past clients important to you? If so, click here to get even more referrals!
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 04-12-2007, 11:22 AM
Bob Harper's Avatar
Bob Harper Bob Harper is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Pa.
Posts: 577
Re: Improper flahing method?
What flashing?
__________________
disgusted with some people on this forum. Out of here!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 04-12-2007, 11:34 AM
Michael Thomas's Avatar
Michael Thomas Michael Thomas is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 1,160
Re: Improper flahing method?
Looks like step flashing with those pre-formed aluminum "L"s to me. (I think I see the vertical lines where they overlap).

If the slope on that roof is in fact as low as it appears in that picture, it's not going to work well - irrespective of whether they should be on installed top of the material behind the trim band (as it appears to me has been done) instead of under it.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 04-12-2007, 07:05 PM
Mike Schulz's Avatar
Mike Schulz Mike Schulz is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Fuquay Varina, NC
Posts: 462
Re: Improper flahing method?
The flashing from what I can see in the picture are to uniform. Each piece of step flashing should be on top of each shingle. It looks as if the step flashing was put in place and the shingles layed over them.
__________________
Mike Schulz License 393
Affordable Home Inspections
www.houseinspections.com
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 04-14-2007, 09:43 AM
Dan Cullen Dan Cullen is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Chicago IL
Posts: 10
Re: Improper flahing method?
The base flashing looks fine. They are called 'baby shingles' in the roofing vernacular. It's the counter flashing (1" x 4") that looks like a problem. The counter flashing in this case is not waterproof. The top edge of the 1" x 4" board will allow moisture to become trapped between itself and the wood siding behind it. A corrosion resistant metal counter flashing would be correct.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 04-14-2007, 12:17 PM
Mike Schulz's Avatar
Mike Schulz Mike Schulz is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Fuquay Varina, NC
Posts: 462
Re: Improper flahing method?
Quote:
The base flashing looks fine. They are called 'baby shingles' in the roofing vernacular.
In 30 years of roofing that is the first time I ever heard of "baby shingles" ?

No the base flashing "which it is called step flashing on the east coast" from that picture doe's not look fine.

The 1x4 is not a "counter flashing". The siding may very well terminate close to the roof covering and over the step flashing and the 1x4 trim board was placed over it. We can't tell from that picture. The shingles could be a over lay or when the old shingles where removed they just went right over the flashings instead of between each piece of flashing.
It is also possible that the bottom edge of the siding had some water damage so they put the 1x4 over it to cover it.

If you have more pictures please post, further away would be best.
__________________
Mike Schulz License 393
Affordable Home Inspections
www.houseinspections.com
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:59 PM.


Design by Vjacheslav Trushkin.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8
vB.Sponsors
All Rights Reserved. Hann Tech Marketing Link / InspectionNews.com / InspectionNews.net - No part of InspectionNews.net may be reproduced in any way, or by any means, without the prior written permission of InspectionNews.net. Use of any index or listing Software for the purpose of constructing a mailing list, creating promotional materials or producing a printed or electronic catalog of any kind is expressly forbidden without the prior written permission of InspectionNews.net - All text, graphics and design on InspectionNews.net is copyright by Hann Tech Marketing Links.
Ad Management by RedTyger