Results 1 to 13 of 13
  1. #1
    Raghav Singh's Avatar
    Raghav Singh Guest

    Default Should NM wiring be recommended?

    Hi,
    Would you recommend that this cable going into the furnace be replaced by romex, or is the armored cable fine as is? Thanks .

    Similar Threads:
    ***IMPORTANT*** You Need To Register To View Images ***IMPORTANT*** You Need To Register To View Images
    Member Benefits1

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Plano, Texas
    Posts
    4,245

    Default Re: Should NM wiring be recommended?

    I could be wrong but that sure looks like a flexible gas connector, not armored cable.

    AC would be preferred over NM if properly installed.

    Jim Luttrall
    www.MrInspector.net
    Plano, Texas

  3. #3
    Raghav Singh's Avatar
    Raghav Singh Guest

    Default Re: Should NM wiring be recommended?

    Quote Originally Posted by Jim Luttrall View Post
    I could be wrong but that sure looks like a flexible gas connector, not armored cable.

    AC would be preferred over NM if properly installed.
    I think you are right about that , I was not on site for a "walk along" on this one , was reviewing these photos from an inspection and assumed that was an AC . I think this other pic (considering the position of the switch, which is on the opposite side) pretty much confirms that it actually a flexible gas connector and not AC. Thanks for the heads up.

    The reason I posted this question is because I was told that NM wiring is "supposed" to be used for any furnace wiring , but have not found any info that backs this up. Considering also, that you are saying the opposite , I am going to have to find out what that person was getting at.

    ***IMPORTANT*** You Need To Register To View Images ***IMPORTANT*** You Need To Register To View Images
    Last edited by Raghav Singh; 10-27-2011 at 10:56 PM.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    928

    Default Re: Should NM wiring be recommended?

    In the Chicago area conduit is used and BX is only allowed for 6 feet however what I see in the picture is a gas flex line.

    The flex line should end outside the appliance and black pipe should have been run to protect the flex line from wear.
    That knockout is sharp and the furnace vibrates.


    UPC 1212.0 Appliance Connectors

    (2) No part of such connector shall be concealed within or extended through any wall, floor, partition, or appliance housing.


  5. #5
    Raghav Singh's Avatar
    Raghav Singh Guest

    Default Re: Should NM wiring be recommended?

    Quote Originally Posted by Bob Elliott View Post
    In the Chicago area conduit is used and BX is only allowed for 6 feet however what I see in the picture is a gas flex line.

    The flex line should end outside the appliance and black pipe should have been run to protect the flex line from wear.
    That knockout is sharp and the furnace vibrates.


    UPC 1212.0 Appliance Connectors

    (2) No part of such connector shall be concealed within or extended through any wall, floor, partition, or appliance housing.
    Yes definitely a gas flex line. But thanks for posting code on proper wiring, that is probably why the inspector took this pic , I'll have to find out.


  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Marietta, Georgia
    Posts
    93

    Default Re: Should NM wiring be recommended?

    Confirmation on the flex gas line..that should not run into the interior of the furnace cabinet anyway..the flex connector manuf disallows it along with the Standard Gas Code. As far as having NM wiring to the furance, you really want to make sure the furance has a equipment ground connection that you would get with a Type NM 3 wire that is protected along its run to the furance and where it enters the furnace cabinet. Also, this is one way to make sure the gas line is bonded as well.


  7. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Wenatchee Wa
    Posts
    301

    Default Re: Should NM wiring be recommended?

    In response to the question on NM wire. I do not think that matters as long as the wire is rated for the application an in accordance of manufacturer's installation requirements.

    But what does matter is that the cable be protected from mechanical damage. Many times the feeders are exposed in the furnace room.

    I have seen where AHJ call this and other times not.

    Don Hester
    NCW Home Inspections, LLC
    Wa. St. Licensed H I #647, WSDA #80050, http://www.ncwhomeinspections.com

  8. #8
    Raghav Singh's Avatar
    Raghav Singh Guest

    Default Re: Should NM wiring be recommended?

    Quote Originally Posted by Michael Bronner View Post
    Confirmation on the flex gas line..that should not run into the interior of the furnace cabinet anyway..the flex connector manuf disallows it along with the Standard Gas Code. As far as having NM wiring to the furance, you really want to make sure the furance has a equipment ground connection that you would get with a Type NM 3 wire that is protected along its run to the furance and where it enters the furnace cabinet. Also, this is one way to make sure the gas line is bonded as well.
    Makes sense, so as Mr. Elliot had also mentioned..


    Quote Originally Posted by Bob Elliott View Post
    In the Chicago area conduit is used and BX is only allowed for 6 feet however what I see in the picture is a gas flex line.

    The flex line should end outside the appliance and black pipe should have been run to protect the flex line from wear.
    That knockout is sharp and the furnace vibrates.


    UPC 1212.0 Appliance Connectors

    (2) No part of such connector shall be concealed within or extended through any wall, floor, partition, or appliance housing.
    This should atleast be reported for the fact that the flex line connector is "concealed within .... appliance housing."

    So to sum up what has been said (If I understand this correctly--pls correct me if I got it wrong) one way this could have been done right, is to have the flex pipe hooked up to a black steel pipe connector outside of the housing. This would keep it from being affected by the sharp knock out which vibrates and may damage it.

    The pic seems to be a good example of this done correctly.

    That helps clear up alot , even though I confused the issue and derailed my own thread from the start , at least there is one more thing to look out for. Thanks

    ***IMPORTANT*** You Need To Register To View Images ***IMPORTANT*** You Need To Register To View Images

  9. #9
    Raghav Singh's Avatar
    Raghav Singh Guest

    Default Re: Should NM wiring be recommended?

    Quote Originally Posted by Don Hester View Post
    In response to the question on NM wire. I do not think that matters as long as the wire is rated for the application an in accordance of manufacturer's installation requirements.

    But what does matter is that the cable be protected from mechanical damage. Many times the feeders are exposed in the furnace room.

    I have seen where AHJ call this and other times not.
    Thanks for that ( sorry all ,for breaking this into 2 different questions, I know it makes it confusing/disorganized)

    So if I understood this (again please correct me if I got it wrong) they should be installed in a way that would make it hard for people (or lawn mower, cars etc) from tripping/stepping/bumping/driving into or onto it?. Any additonal cautions?

    Thanks, your response was much appreciated


  10. #10
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Fletcher, NC
    Posts
    28,032

    Default Re: Should NM wiring be recommended?

    The sediment trap in that last photo is wrong ... actually it is so wrong that I should not even call it a sediment trap, because it is not going to trap any sediment - that is, unless that gas connector goes from the valve to up, then turns down and connects to the top of the sediment trap (the photo is not from an angle which answers that question).

    Jerry Peck
    Construction/Litigation/Code Consultant - Retired
    www.AskCodeMan.com

  11. #11
    Raghav Singh's Avatar
    Raghav Singh Guest

    Default Re: Should NM wiring be recommended?

    Quote Originally Posted by Jerry Peck View Post
    The sediment trap in that last photo is wrong ... actually it is so wrong that I should not even call it a sediment trap, because it is not going to trap any sediment - that is, unless that gas connector goes from the valve to up, then turns down and connects to the top of the sediment trap (the photo is not from an angle which answers that question).
    I'll try to get some more pics sent to me , apparently the inspector wrote this furnace up with a couple issues , probably has some more pics. If he has different angles , I'll certainly upload them.

    Now, off to study proper installation sediment traps


  12. #12
    Adrian Wilson's Avatar
    Adrian Wilson Guest

    Default Re: Should NM wiring be recommended?

    From what is visible from the last pic. my guess is that the connection is ok as long as that is the top of the heater with the gas inlet. Thought the bend in the connector is sharp the line did not seem distorted, flex lines should not be forced into 90 degree bends. On your first question, while the point of protecting the flexline from damage from rubbing sounds like a good idea, i question just how much vibration the heater has and if it's really in danger of touching the case. As to the assertion that it is hidden, if the access panel to the heater gives clear view to the connector, which would be normal since you need access to the gas valve I'm sure its connected to, is it hidden?. A flexline behind a heavy range you must use a floor jack to move is not 'hidden', nor a flex to a cooktop you have to remove drawers to see the line 'hidden line'. Running a flexline in a closed chase in an appliance or through a hole in the side that gives you full view of the flexline are not the same thing in my opinion.


  13. #13
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Atlanta, Georgia
    Posts
    1,088

    Default Re: Should NM wiring be recommended?

    Quote Originally Posted by Adrian Wilson View Post
    On your first question, while the point of protecting the flex line from damage from rubbing sounds like a good idea, i question just how much vibration the heater has and if it's really in danger of touching the case...
    When the fan starts up, the entire unit shakes and shimmies. How many times does the fan cycle on and off during a day. Lots of opportunity for the flex pipe to rub against the sharp housing.

    "The Code is not a peak to reach but a foundation to build from."

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •