Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1
    Sarah Dave's Avatar
    Sarah Dave Guest

    Default Sheathing issue - View from attic

    In the process of buying a home and found this during the home inspection.

    Experts please comment on severity/repercussions/cost to repair this type of issue. Note home is in an area where it does snow in the winter months.

    Thank you!

    Similar Threads:
    ***IMPORTANT*** You Need To Register To View Images ***IMPORTANT*** You Need To Register To View Images
    Member Benefits1

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Fletcher, NC
    Posts
    28,032

    Default Re: Sheathing issue - View from attic

    For starters, that was done completely wrong.

    As for the cost to correct, that would depend on what type of roof covering you have to remove to make the repair ...

    ... unless someone makes a "repair" from the underside without removing the roof covering - which could lead to leaking of the roof covering.

    Plywood is rated to be installed on 3 supports minimum and across 2 spans minimum; that piece is installed on 2 supports and is across 1 span. As installed, the rating of the plywood is unknown (an engineer could possibly calculate the rating, but for that cost you could correct it).

    The proper correction is to remove the roof covering over that piece and for at least 2 feet to either side (or to both sides), remove that bowed piece of plywood which could give way and fall into the attic with the snow load (which may be why it is bowed now - from the weight of the snow), then install a new piece of plywood across at least 3 supports and 2 spans. Then re-install the roof covering.

    The repair from inside would be adding blocking along the edges and then a center support, pushing that existing piece of plywood back up, but ...

    ... that is what could cause the roof covering to leak - pushing that existing piece up and flexing the roof covering. That, to me, would not be an acceptable repair.

    By the way, the minimum size of that piece of plywood perpendicular to the face grain is 24 inches.

    Thus, the minimum size for a plywood (or OSB) repair is 24 inches perpendicular across the face grain by 48 inches parallel with the face grain.

    Jerry Peck
    Construction/Litigation/Code Consultant - Retired
    www.AskCodeMan.com

  3. #3
    Sarah Dave's Avatar
    Sarah Dave Guest

    Default Re: Sheathing issue - View from attic

    Jerry. Thank you! Great information. Very helpful!


  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Minneapolis, MN
    Posts
    780

    Default Re: Sheathing issue - View from attic

    Jerry, you mean if I were going to repair a 5" hole in my roof, I would have to cut out at least a 4' X 2' section of decking to replace? Is that a nation-wide code?

    That repair was obviously done poorly. Looks like the plywood is too thin; should be at least 5/8". No H-clips and probably poorly attached. But if it were done well it seems like the size shouldn't be a problem - however, I don't know codes, I'm just going by experience here.

    EDIT: Oh, Jerry is talking about plywood ratings I see, not building codes per se.

    EDIT 2: And now that I think about it, we always avoided sheathing spans of fewer than 3 rafters/trusses, and since apparently the whole 4' width of the sheet has been replaced, I can see how it might now be necessary to replace a 4' X 4' section. Unless it would be possible at this point to push it up and block it, but I suppose the inspectors here wouldn't like that idea.

    (this is me arguing with myself...good thing I don't normally do it online)

    Last edited by Kristi Silber; 02-25-2012 at 03:59 PM.
    Do not think of knocking out another person's brains because he differs in opinion from you. It would be as rational to knock yourself on the head because you differ from yourself ten years ago.
    - James Burgh, 1754.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Orlando, FL
    Posts
    1,592

    Default Re: Sheathing issue - View from attic

    What did your home inspector say? What was on the roof, and is this a patch or some other anomaly? (Pic is of little help...)


  6. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Fletcher, NC
    Posts
    28,032

    Default Re: Sheathing issue - View from attic

    Quote Originally Posted by Kristi Silber View Post
    Jerry, you mean if I were going to repair a 5" hole in my roof, I would have to cut out at least a 4' X 2' section of decking to replace? Is that a nation-wide code?

    EDIT: Oh, Jerry is talking about plywood ratings I see, not building codes per se.
    It is in the building code too: (bold and underlining are mine)
    - R803.2.2 Allowable spans. The maximum allowable spans for wood structural panel roof sheathing shall not exceed the values set forth in Table R503.2.1.1(1), or APA E30.

    - TABLE R503.2.1.1(1)
    - - ALLOWABLE SPANS AND LOADS FOR WOOD STRUCTURAL PANELS FOR ROOF AND SUBFLOOR SHEATHING AND COMBINATION SUBFLOOR UNDERLAYMENTa, b, c
    - - - (make sure to read notes b and c)
    - - - b. Panels continuous over two or more spans with long dimension perpendicular to supports. Spans shall be limited to values shown because of possible effect of concentrated loads.
    - - - c. Applies to panels 24 inches or wider.

    "continuous over two or more spans" = 3 supports

    By the way, APA E30 says the same thing.

    Jerry Peck
    Construction/Litigation/Code Consultant - Retired
    www.AskCodeMan.com

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Minneapolis, MN
    Posts
    780

    Default Re: Sheathing issue - View from attic

    Looks like a patch to me.

    Couldn't find that about sheathing and spans in whatever version of codes I'm looking at, I think it's an abbreviated version. But I'm not surprised, and it makes sense. I should have thought it through before writing. Just seems such a shame to have to tear off a large patch of roof because of one sagging bit.

    - TABLE R503.2.1.1(1)
    - - ALLOWABLE SPANS AND LOADS FOR WOOD STRUCTURAL PANELS FOR ROOF AND SUBFLOOR SHEATHING AND COMBINATION SUBFLOOR UNDERLAYMENTa, b, c
    - - - (make sure to read notes b and c) c'mon, it doesn't really say that! Does it?
    - - - b. Panels continuous over two or more spans with long dimension perpendicular to supports. Spans shall be limited to values shown because of possible effect of concentrated loads.
    - - - c. Applies to panels 24 inches or wider.

    "continuous over two or more spans" = 3 supports

    By the way, APA E30 says the same thing.


    Do not think of knocking out another person's brains because he differs in opinion from you. It would be as rational to knock yourself on the head because you differ from yourself ten years ago.
    - James Burgh, 1754.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •