Results 1 to 39 of 39
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    WESTMINSTER CO
    Posts
    1,152

    Default NEW TYPE OF DECK SUPPORTS

    GUYS

    1968 mounting home in boulder co--$1,000,000 price tag--the decks and upper levels were built in 1998--permits pulled but dn't know if finaled and inspected--what if the rocks move--writing it up to have a structural engineer give it a look--never saw this before--wht do you think


    cvf

    ***IMPORTANT*** You Need To Register To View Images ***IMPORTANT*** You Need To Register To View Images
    Inspection Referral

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Knoxville, TN
    Posts
    2,560

    Default Re: NEW TYPE OF DECK SUPPORTS

    Are those 4x4 posts? Are they over 8' high?


  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    WESTMINSTER CO
    Posts
    1,152

    Default Re: NEW TYPE OF DECK SUPPORTS

    Quote Originally Posted by Jack Feldmann View Post
    Are those 4x4 posts? Are they over 8' high?
    they are 4 x4 but this was a quick photo because I just deployed radon test today Wednesday is inspection--they only appeared to be about six foot high--but they bare on red rocks--that were flattened out to hold post--more complete look on Wednesday

    cvf


  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Lansdale, PA
    Posts
    876

    Default Re: NEW TYPE OF DECK SUPPORTS

    If the rocks are sitting on soil I would not approve it. If the rocks are well seated on rocks below it may be fine.


  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Knoxville, TN
    Posts
    2,560

    Default Re: NEW TYPE OF DECK SUPPORTS

    Not sure what type of rocks they are sitting on, but I bet the rocks are bigger than any footing they would have put there. I'm guessing the rocks were naturally there, and not brought in and plopped on fill.
    What are the post holding up? Is it just a deck?

    While I would probably call for an engineer to look at it, my rough guess is the rocks may be strong enough to support the load. A lot depends on what kind of rocks they are, and if we are only seeing the tip of the iceberg if you will (only a portion of the rock is above ground).

    You were there, so you are better to make the call because you can see the big picture.


  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    WESTMINSTER CO
    Posts
    1,152

    Default Re: NEW TYPE OF DECK SUPPORTS

    Quote Originally Posted by Jack Feldmann View Post
    Not sure what type of rocks they are sitting on, but I bet the rocks are bigger than any footing they would have put there. I'm guessing the rocks were naturally there, and not brought in and plopped on fill.
    What are the post holding up? Is it just a deck?

    While I would probably call for an engineer to look at it, my rough guess is the rocks may be strong enough to support the load. A lot depends on what kind of rocks they are, and if we are only seeing the tip of the iceberg if you will (only a portion of the rock is above ground).

    You were there, so you are better to make the call because you can see the big picture.
    jack

    think the rocks were not made by God--but ill get more photos at inspection--this property was not nature


  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Bennett (Denver metro), Colorado
    Posts
    1,461

    Default Re: NEW TYPE OF DECK SUPPORTS

    If the rocks are naturally placed "by God", then that deck is probably more solid than on concrete. But, if placed by humans, then I would question their stability. Your photos don't look natural. I suspect they were relocated to accommodate the house foundation. At least, report your suspicions if you think they are not naturally placed and concerns and recommend evaluation from an engineer.

    On one hand they survived the massive rain of Sept., 2013, so they are unlikely to move around but if they are just placed on the dirt, that isn't a "best practice".

    If you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice.

  8. #8
    Hilary Goss's Avatar
    Hilary Goss Guest

    Default Re: NEW TYPE OF DECK SUPPORTS

    Quote Originally Posted by CHARLIE VAN FLEET View Post
    they are 4 x4 but this was a quick photo because I just deployed radon test today Wednesday is inspection--they only appeared to be about six foot high--but they bare on red rocks--that were flattened out to hold post--more complete look on Wednesday

    cvf
    Solid as a Rock. You reported it correctly. H Goss


  9. #9

    Default Re: NEW TYPE OF DECK SUPPORTS

    I used to run into this all the time on the cabins up at Donner Summit area of the High Sierras. Under the house they would flatten out a small area on top of a granite boulder that had been there for millions of years and use it as the footer for the posts.

    This does look like they were "placed" there for the purpose of supporting the deck and for aesthetics.

    True Professionals, Inc. Property Consultant
    877-466-8504

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Utah
    Posts
    112

    Default Re: NEW TYPE OF DECK SUPPORTS

    Quote Originally Posted by CHARLIE VAN FLEET View Post
    GUYS

    1968 mounting home in boulder co--$1,000,000 price tag--the decks and upper levels were built in 1998--permits pulled but dn't know if finaled and inspected--what if the rocks move--writing it up to have a structural engineer give it a look--never saw this before--wht do you think


    cvf
    Looks like the deck is supported by a column of weight bearing atmosphere.
    The rocks are pretty massive, appear to be several tons each. That roof likely will not produce enough load for the rocks to even know it is there. However, appearance has been known to be deceiving.


  11. #11
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Mahtomedi, Minnesota
    Posts
    94

    Default Re: NEW TYPE OF DECK SUPPORTS

    Quote Originally Posted by CHARLIE VAN FLEET View Post
    GUYS

    1968 mounting home in boulder co--$1,000,000 price tag--the decks and upper levels were built in 1998--permits pulled but dn't know if finaled and inspected--what if the rocks move--writing it up to have a structural engineer give it a look--never saw this before--wht do you think


    cvf
    What is the frost depth in your area? Does the base of the boulder reach that depth? Will the shape of the boulder promote heaving?

    Fred Comb, ACI
    Mahtomedi, MN
    www.homeinspectionsofmn.com

  12. #12
    Hilary Goss's Avatar
    Hilary Goss Guest

    Default Re: NEW TYPE OF DECK SUPPORTS

    Quote Originally Posted by Fred Comb View Post
    What is the frost depth in your area? Does the base of the boulder reach that depth? Will the shape of the boulder promote heaving?
    Often the deck will have potted plants, hot tub or other secondary water source or load added overhead. Wind blown rain, the new owner raking pine or other debris away from the base support soil areas of those rocks. Any erosion man made or nature caused will weaken this installation with no side supports in place for the posts either. I have seen below deck areas become dog kennels for vacation homes or permanent residence. Digging animals, squirrels or dogs can remove support soils quickly add a rain or drainage splash pattern, just as effective. Using this method below the home for foundation support is only somewhat safer, seldom in a seismic area would this be trusted.


  13. #13
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Oregon, USA
    Posts
    333

    Default Re: NEW TYPE OF DECK SUPPORTS

    I'm an engineer, and would not want my licenses at risk by approving such a deck foundation. Loose boulders have been known to move, regardless of how old they are. One of the columns looks well out-of-plumb already.


  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    California
    Posts
    28

    Default Not all that unusual in certain locales but every AHJ has asked for...

    a PE, preferably a Soils, to sign off on it. I'm not an inspector but I would place a disclaimer in your report suggesting the same thing.


  15. #15
    jbuckhead's Avatar
    jbuckhead Guest

    Default Re: NEW TYPE OF DECK SUPPORTS

    Quote Originally Posted by CHARLIE VAN FLEET View Post
    GUYS

    1968 mounting home in boulder co--$1,000,000 price tag--the decks and upper levels were built in 1998--permits pulled but dn't know if finaled and inspected--what if the rocks move--writing it up to have a structural engineer give it a look--never saw this before--wht do you think


    cvf
    Without documented approval and sign off what else can you do other than recommend further evaluation.it doesn't look right to me. Erosion would be another concern of mine.


  16. #16
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Southern Vancouver Island
    Posts
    4,607

    Default Re: NEW TYPE OF DECK SUPPORTS

    The post out of plumb needs repair certainly.

    If there is any danger of erosion down the bank behind those boulders, it is a concern. A stacked boulder retaining wall is very stable if built right, better than concrete. But you want to inspect the slope or wall behind those boulders.

    John Kogel, RHI, BC HI Lic #47455
    www.allsafehome.ca

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    New Mexico
    Posts
    2

    Default Re: NEW TYPE OF DECK SUPPORTS

    [QUOTE=CHARLIE VAN FLEET;253234]GUYS

    1968 mounting home in boulder co--$1,000,000 price tag--the decks and upper levels were built in 1998--permits pulled but dn't know if finaled and inspected--what if the rocks move--writing it up to have a structural engineer give it a look--never saw this before--wht do you think


    cvf So you are saying the columns have been on the boulders since '98? It does not look like any movement has taken place. My guess is if the boulders start moving so will the rest of the mountain, but having an engineer look at it will certainly be prudent.

    Last edited by Lloyd Goldrick; 01-27-2015 at 02:36 PM.

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Spring Hill (Nashville), TN
    Posts
    5,851

    Default Re: NEW TYPE OF DECK SUPPORTS

    It looks like the boulders were "plopped" or placed and are not natural to their current location. I would also bet the area might have fill to level it out and the boulders are also acting as a retaining wall of sorts. But this is all SWAG from a couple of photos.

    Scott Patterson, ACI
    Spring Hill, TN
    www.traceinspections.com

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    WESTMINSTER CO
    Posts
    1,152

    Default Re: NEW TYPE OF DECK SUPPORTS

    GUYS

    did inspection today on that mountain deck house--looks like they are Gods installed rocks--but stil scary to me--two of the post have vertical cracks--so recommended evalution by structural engineer --here are some more photos

    cvf

    ***IMPORTANT*** You Need To Register To View Images ***IMPORTANT*** You Need To Register To View Images

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Fletcher, NC
    Posts
    28,032

    Default Re: NEW TYPE OF DECK SUPPORTS

    From the new angle, the posts appear to be bearing on the rocks well beyond the center or rotation of the elongated shaped rocks.

    If Mother Nature placed the rocks there, maybe she needs to get a real engineer on board with her ... or create the rocks with warning labels "Do Not use the pointy top of the rocks as structural support for future structures".

    Jerry Peck
    Construction/Litigation/Code Consultant - Retired
    www.AskCodeMan.com

  21. #21
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Prescott, AZ
    Posts
    99

    Default Re: NEW TYPE OF DECK SUPPORTS

    I was a contractor in the Rockies west of Denver for many years, Jefferson County not Boulder County. But I built many decks (and sometimes part of the home) supported on the granite like this deck. They were all planned, permitted, inspected and approved. I see it here in AZ too. It is a little unusual to have the bottom of the post on an 'overhang'. But it does not look like those boulders have moved, and it does not look like the deck has settled/moved. If that granite 'breaks', the house is likely on its way down the mountain anyway. If everything else on the deck construction was good (eg lag bolts, joist hangers, post bases, etc.) I would not recommend an engineer.

    Some replies say "everything looks OK but recommend engineer". Why? If I can't say exactly what looks 'wrong' I am not recommending an engineer. I would recommend my clients (assuming they are the buyers) ask the sellers for permits. The deck was added after the home was built. If the deck was engineered, permitted, inspected and approved and the sellers have the paperwork why would you need an engineer? And wouldn't you feel kind of silly when the seller presents all the paperwork and your clients ask you why they need an engineer?

    If the deck was not permitted then there are potential problems even if it is well built.

    I have not failed. I've just found 10,000 ways that won't work. (Thomas Edison)

  22. #22
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    sellersburg, in. work in lou, ky.
    Posts
    138

    Default Re: NEW TYPE OF DECK SUPPORTS

    I'm not seeing post cap connections where the supports rest on the 4x4s? And also there is cantilevered deck beyond the posts over the drop off as seen in the second pic from the first set of photos that may need angle bracing back to the posts? Also it appears at least one post is sitting on top of the walk edging unsecured? :/ I would recommend an Engineer but that's just the way I see it..


  23. #23
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Southern Vancouver Island
    Posts
    4,607

    Default Re: NEW TYPE OF DECK SUPPORTS

    If it was built right in the first place we would have nothing to discuss here. With the price tag on this house, that deck could be sitting on steel archways. Why would anyone argue that it is good enough on those flimsy 4X4's with no bracing, cock-eyed post, missing brackets etc?

    It hasn't collapsed yet but maybe it hasn't been tested yet.
    I'm talking a Billy Stevens Hot Tub party, 30 guests jiving to Elvis and shooting their guns off in wild celebration.

    John Kogel, RHI, BC HI Lic #47455
    www.allsafehome.ca

  24. #24
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    47

    Default Re: NEW TYPE OF DECK SUPPORTS

    Sorry, skidding a little off topic, but regarding the downspouts, I don't see any straps or brackets. Did someone just screw or nail right through them? It is hard to see from here.
    Thanks.

    ***IMPORTANT*** You Need To Register To View Images ***IMPORTANT*** You Need To Register To View Images

  25. #25
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Hercules, CA
    Posts
    159

    Default Re: NEW TYPE OF DECK SUPPORTS

    I think you get an evaluation by a Geotechnical Engineer (Registered Civil Engineer specializing in soils) to evaluate the boulders as well as the overall stability of the cliff. Also, there should be some lateral bracing for the posts and support beams. Looks pretty scary to me, too!

    Thom Huggett, PE, SE, CBO

  26. #26
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Luxemburg, Wisconsin
    Posts
    46

    Default Re: NEW TYPE OF DECK SUPPORTS

    Are the joists cantelevered and the posts (simply) cosmetic?


  27. #27
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    sellersburg, in. work in lou, ky.
    Posts
    138

    Default Re: NEW TYPE OF DECK SUPPORTS

    Not cosmetic.. the deck was not constructed properly and is not secured/braced in required locations. I would be very interested to see how it is attached to the home also and if the bolts are protected from water with proper flashings. Once again, an Engineer would be my recommendation.


  28. #28
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    MONTREAL QUEBEC-CANADA
    Posts
    2,075

    Default Re: NEW TYPE OF DECK SUPPORTS

    Many forces in addition to gravity can affect a deck’s ability to remain stable. I see no anti sway bracing.

    Remember, high winds may likely cause uplift plus top heavy decks can shifting or rack. Both of which cause tremendous stress and possible failures.

    Utilizing 6x6 structural posts have twice the resistance to sway than 4x4’s.

    Tall decks such as this are much more susceptible to these unbalancing forces.

    No anti sway. Buring the posts would have contributed to stability.


    Robert Young's Montreal Home Inspection Services Inc.
    Call (514) 489-1887 or (514) 441-3732
    Our Motto; Putting information where you need it most, "In your hands.”

  29. #29
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    WESTMINSTER CO
    Posts
    1,152

    Default Re: NEW TYPE OF DECK SUPPORTS

    buyer had structural engineer out--he said it was good--but recommend bigger stirrups on base of two posts--told client to get it in writing--I still don't like it but I did my job--over and above

    cvf


  30. #30
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Lansdale, PA
    Posts
    876

    Default Re: NEW TYPE OF DECK SUPPORTS

    Quote Originally Posted by ROBERT YOUNG View Post
    Many forces in addition to gravity can affect a deck’s ability to remain stable. I see no anti sway bracing.

    Remember, high winds may likely cause uplift plus top heavy decks can shifting or rack. Both of which cause tremendous stress and possible failures.

    Utilizing 6x6 structural posts have twice the resistance to sway than 4x4’s.

    Tall decks such as this are much more susceptible to these unbalancing forces.

    No anti sway. Buring the posts would have contributed to stability.
    Unless the columns are set in concrete in the ground they really do not provide any significant resistance to lateral movement. Some form of diagonal bracing is typically needed.


  31. #31
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    WESTMINSTER CO
    Posts
    1,152

    Default Re: NEW TYPE OF DECK SUPPORTS

    done here


  32. #32
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    MONTREAL QUEBEC-CANADA
    Posts
    2,075

    Default Re: NEW TYPE OF DECK SUPPORTS

    Quote Originally Posted by Mark Reinmiller View Post
    Unless the columns are set in concrete in the ground they really do not provide any significant resistance to lateral movement. Some form of diagonal bracing is typically needed.
    I concur. With concrete.

    Robert Young's Montreal Home Inspection Services Inc.
    Call (514) 489-1887 or (514) 441-3732
    Our Motto; Putting information where you need it most, "In your hands.”

  33. #33
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Caledon, Ontario
    Posts
    4,982

    Default Re: NEW TYPE OF DECK SUPPORTS

    Those 4x4s appear to have post saddles installed, and the rebar portion is drilled into the rock. Do you still feel they need concrete and lateral stability?

    Typically up in cottage country this is how deck posts are mounted into the exposed granite of the Canadian Shield with post saddles.


  34. #34
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    sellersburg, in. work in lou, ky.
    Posts
    138

    Default Re: NEW TYPE OF DECK SUPPORTS

    Quote Originally Posted by Raymond Wand View Post
    Those 4x4s appear to have post saddles installed, and the rebar portion is drilled into the rock. Do you still feel they need concrete and lateral stability?

    Typically up in cottage country this is how deck posts are mounted into the exposed granite of the Canadian Shield with post saddles.
    It does not appear all are but it is possible there is something there I am not seeing. The ones on the boulders appear fine but I make no opinion definitively because I'm not there to see the hill beneath although I would recommend some diagonal bracing. It does appear however there are standard post bases utilized on others.


  35. #35
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Lansdale, PA
    Posts
    876

    Default Re: NEW TYPE OF DECK SUPPORTS

    Quote Originally Posted by Raymond Wand View Post
    Those 4x4s appear to have post saddles installed, and the rebar portion is drilled into the rock. Do you still feel they need concrete and lateral stability?

    Typically up in cottage country this is how deck posts are mounted into the exposed granite of the Canadian Shield with post saddles.
    Post saddles and rebar do not prevent the deck from swaying. You really cannot properly transfer bending moments through those types of connections. Diagonal bracing on columns or at the underside of the deck would typically be needed.


  36. #36
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    WESTMINSTER CO
    Posts
    1,152

    Default Re: NEW TYPE OF DECK SUPPORTS

    guys--the structural engineer signed off on this deck--why are we still talking about it--let it go--it is in the hands of the engineers

    cvf


    OVER AND OUT


  37. #37
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Caledon, Ontario
    Posts
    4,982

    Default Re: NEW TYPE OF DECK SUPPORTS

    Thanks Mark.


  38. #38
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Long Beach, CA
    Posts
    19

    Default Re: NEW TYPE OF DECK SUPPORTS

    This is not a new type post connection it is an "improper post to footing connection", post to footing connection should protect the post from slipping or moving, proper footings are not in that picture, referring to a structural Engineer is appropriate.


  39. #39
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Lansdale, PA
    Posts
    876

    Default Re: NEW TYPE OF DECK SUPPORTS

    Quote Originally Posted by CHARLIE VAN FLEET View Post
    guys--the structural engineer signed off on this deck--why are we still talking about it--let it go--it is in the hands of the engineers

    cvf


    OVER AND OUT
    For educational purposes, when inspectors questions things or provide information that I think is incorrect, I continue to respond. Signing off on something can mean many different things. I am a Structural Engineer and don't always agree with things other SEs say. I did not really look at lateral stability issues with that deck, rather I was responding to notion that the size of the columns or methods of connection have little to do with lateral stability.

    Sometimes we beat dead horses here, but often there is something to be learned along the way.


Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •