Results 1 to 18 of 18
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    WESTMINSTER CO
    Posts
    1,152

    Default safe cable installation

    guys

    does this cable installation keep it away from harm or damage as required

    cvf

    Similar Threads:
    ***IMPORTANT*** You Need To Register To View Images ***IMPORTANT*** You Need To Register To View Images
    Inspection Referral

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Colorado Front Range
    Posts
    684

    Default Re: safe cable installation

    This looks like flexible metal conduit as near as I can tell. Not allowed where subject to damage.

    Depends where you're at in the area whether an electrical inspector would pass that - most wouldn't.

    Common rule of thumb is that wiring types that are not allowed where subject to damage aren't allowed below 6 feet above the floor. It's not in the code book but it's generally what gets pushed by electrical inspectors.

    I'm not sure how upset I'd be with it because the legally installed stuff behind the drywall can be damaged by running a 2 inch screw into the strap that holds the flex on, and, it's a lot harder to damage than NM-B.

    Short answer - it doesn't fly

    Occam's eraser: The philosophical principle that even the simplest solution is bound to have something wrong with it.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Orlando, FL
    Posts
    1,592

    Default Re: safe cable installation

    Around here it would likely be EMT or Sch 80 PVC, depending on who does it.


  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Colorado Front Range
    Posts
    684

    Default Re: safe cable installation

    Yeah, it usually is EMT. Here again, its open to opinions. EMT isn't supposed to be used where its subject to severe damage. "Severe" is no more defined than "regular" damage.

    Occam's eraser: The philosophical principle that even the simplest solution is bound to have something wrong with it.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Santa Rosa, CA
    Posts
    3,154

    Default Re: safe cable installation

    Quote Originally Posted by Bill Kriegh View Post
    This looks like flexible metal conduit as near as I can tell. Not allowed where subject to damage.
    Bill,

    I was surprised to learn (a while back) that MC isn't allowed where subject to damage. I hadn't put flex into the same category, but I suppose it makes sense.

    Is AC ok where subject to damage?

    Department of Redundancy Department
    Supreme Emperor of Hyperbole
    http://www.FullCircleInspect.com/

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    WESTMINSTER CO
    Posts
    1,152

    Default Re: safe cable installation

    guys

    is there a six foot above ground rule with flex because of damage--waiting to call city inspector monday


  7. #7
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Colorado Front Range
    Posts
    684

    Default Re: safe cable installation

    Charlie, No written rule I'm aware of. The installation height is pretty much an inspector opinion. Opinion has a lot to do with how the space is used and might be used in the future.

    There could be something local in an electrical code amendment but I've never seen one in the metro area. Have seen a lot of head shaking where flex is installed though.

    Gunnar, No, AC not permitted where subject to damage. Article 302.12

    Occam's eraser: The philosophical principle that even the simplest solution is bound to have something wrong with it.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Santa Rosa, CA
    Posts
    3,154

    Default Re: safe cable installation

    Quote Originally Posted by Bill Kriegh View Post
    Gunnar, No, AC not permitted where subject to damage. Article 302.12

    Thanks Bill. But, in the California Electric Code, it's in 320.12.



    Last edited by Gunnar Alquist; 03-14-2021 at 01:29 PM.
    Department of Redundancy Department
    Supreme Emperor of Hyperbole
    http://www.FullCircleInspect.com/

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Chico,Ca
    Posts
    454

    Default Re: safe cable installation

    Quote Originally Posted by Gunnar Alquist View Post
    Bill,

    I was surprised to learn (a while back) that MC isn't allowed where subject to damage. I hadn't put flex into the same category, but I suppose it makes sense.

    Is AC ok where subject to damage?
    AC, MC, & NM cable are all prohibited where subject to physical damage.


  10. #10
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Fletcher, NC
    Posts
    28,032

    Default Re: safe cable installation

    Many places use 'to 8 feet', using a code section requirement as the basis for that 8 feet height protection from physical damage (I don't have my codes with me, I'm thinking 300.4/300.5 somewhere around there).

    Jerry Peck
    Construction/Litigation/Code Consultant - Retired
    www.AskCodeMan.com

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Santa Rosa, CA
    Posts
    3,154

    Default Re: safe cable installation

    Quote Originally Posted by Jerry Peck View Post
    Many places use 'to 8 feet', using a code section requirement as the basis for that 8 feet height protection from physical damage (I don't have my codes with me, I'm thinking 300.4/300.5 somewhere around there).
    Jerry,

    Is this what you are referring to? It seems specific to direct-burial cable, but it does state 8'. I haven't found it elsewhere, but then again (unlike you) I don't read the NEC for pleasure.

    300.5(I) Emerging from Grade. Direct-buried conductors and cables emerging from grade and specified in columns 1 and 4 of Table 300.5 shall be protected by enclosures or raceways extending from the minimum cover distance below grade required by 300.5(A) to a point at least 2.5 m (8 ft) above finished grade. In no case shall the protection be required to exceed 450 mm (18 in.) below finished grade

    Department of Redundancy Department
    Supreme Emperor of Hyperbole
    http://www.FullCircleInspect.com/

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Fletcher, NC
    Posts
    28,032

    Default Re: safe cable installation

    Gunnar,

    Yes, while that is specifically referring to "Direct-buried conductors and cables emerging from grade", it is also used by some/many as a definition for protection distance, below ground and above ground, from physical damage.

    It would be good if the NEC gave a specific 'subject to physical damage' range, but there are so many variables to try to account for.

    Jerry Peck
    Construction/Litigation/Code Consultant - Retired
    www.AskCodeMan.com

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Maryland
    Posts
    1,970

    Default Re: safe cable installation

    How many actually think that flex is going to get damaged given its location.?

    All answers based on unamended National Electrical codes.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Fletcher, NC
    Posts
    28,032

    Default Re: safe cable installation

    Quote Originally Posted by Jim Port View Post
    How many actually think that flex is going to get damaged given its location.?
    It only matters what two people think (one person really): 2) the electrical inspector; 1) the building official (if he thinks the electrical inspector is wrong).

    Jerry Peck
    Construction/Litigation/Code Consultant - Retired
    www.AskCodeMan.com

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Colorado Front Range
    Posts
    684

    Default Re: safe cable installation

    Quote Originally Posted by Jim Port View Post
    How many actually think that flex is going to get damaged given its location.?
    You'd be surprised what I've found "out there"

    Occam's eraser: The philosophical principle that even the simplest solution is bound to have something wrong with it.

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Colorado Front Range
    Posts
    684

    Default Re: safe cable installation

    Quote Originally Posted by Gunnar Alquist View Post
    Thanks Bill. But, in the California Electric Code, it's in 320.12.

    Yep. Somebody transposed a number.

    Occam's eraser: The philosophical principle that even the simplest solution is bound to have something wrong with it.

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Fletcher, NC
    Posts
    28,032

    Default Re: safe cable installation

    Quote Originally Posted by Bill Kriegh View Post
    You'd be surprised what I've found "out there"
    In my garage ... that'd be subject to physical damage.

    Jerry Peck
    Construction/Litigation/Code Consultant - Retired
    www.AskCodeMan.com

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Maryland, DC, and Northern Virginia, electrical only
    Posts
    444

    Default Re: safe cable installation

    I've submitted multiple NEC proposals/ public inputs on the subject of "physical damage." It is a term of art, but one without a clear definition.

    In one code cycle, I attempted to remove the term "physical." While the CMP did not respond that putting wiring at risk of emotional damage is prohibited, at the same time they did not provide a clear definition. However, their response seemed to suggest that they mean mechanical damage. In a subsequent cycle, I enumerated varieties of mechanical damage, and this was rejected on the ground that other physical damage such as overheating or chemical deterioration is included.

    What it comes down to is a 110.12, or arguably a 110.3(A), only a version that inspectors may be more comfortable citing. The citation, after all, can only be validated or falsified after the fact.Somewhere in my archives I've a picture of horizontal 4 in EMT mounted outdoors about 10 ft up on a wall--and dinged, possibly by a truck. Is that a demonstration of physical damage? I'd say it's the very ding an sich.


Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •