Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. #1
    John Stephenson's Avatar
    John Stephenson Guest

    Default SE needed or not?

    Last edited by John Stephenson; 12-22-2007 at 08:11 AM.
    OREP Insurance

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Healdsburg, CA
    Posts
    1,741

    Cool Re: SE needed or not?

    You betcha.

    Jerry McCarthy
    Building Code/ Construction Consultant

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Colorado Springs, CO
    Posts
    1,217

    Default Re: SE needed or not?

    Yeah, I would say a SE is warranted in this case.

    I have always called that piece in the 3rd pic a "bird box".

    "Baseball is like church. Many attend but few understand." Leo Durocher
    Bruce Breedlove
    www.avaloninspection.com

  4. #4
    James Duffin's Avatar
    James Duffin Guest

    Default Re: SE needed or not?

    Isn't that stone just cosmetic and not structural? It could fall off the house and not make a difference it seems.


  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Lake Barrington, IL
    Posts
    1,367

    Default Re: SE needed or not?

    I gotta agree with James. That looks to be cultured stone mounted on substrate. I don't think that the rake return separation is related. The correlations just aren't there. I would not go the SE route. My money is on a cosmetic condition.

    Eric Barker, ACI
    Lake Barrington, IL

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Connecticut
    Posts
    1,828

    Default Re: SE needed or not?

    Was any framing cut in the attic above because it looks like the corner of the foundation settled which is common but it seems that the framing has pushed the upper corner out which would go along with mabey a cut collar tie or rafter


  7. #7
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Fletcher, NC
    Posts
    28,042

    Default Re: SE needed or not?

    Quote Originally Posted by James Duffin View Post
    Isn't that stone just cosmetic and not structural? It could fall off the house and not make a difference it seems.
    Except that *something* is moving, allowing movement of that stone, which is causing the cracking.

    Jerry Peck
    Construction/Litigation/Code Consultant - Retired
    www.AskCodeMan.com

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Corpus Christi, TX
    Posts
    615

    Default Re: SE needed or not?

    You didn't indicate if you could see the framing members inside the garage and around the door. It's doubtful you could get to the connections of the rafters at the top plates. You probably can't see what has happened to the substrate beneath that open crack as a result of water penetration. I would call for the SE opinion in this case.

    The only reason some people get lost in thought is because it's unfamiliar territory.
    - Paul Fix

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •