InspectionNews - Home Inspection



Welcome to the InspectionNews - Home Inspection forums.

You are currently viewing InspectionNews as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions but not pictures. There are over 6,300 inspectors who have already joined. By joining InspectionNews you will be able to see the pictures, have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast and simple so please, join InspectionNews today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Why join InspectionNews? Read the Testimonials
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 04-26-2007, 01:08 PM
Eric Smith Eric Smith is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Millersville, MD
Posts: 33
Not intended for Use?
At an inspection yesterday I came across this. My concern was that the four beams being used as the lintel were not securely attached to the post.

I wrote "Observed that lintel was only secured to post by four nails which shear strength may not be adequate for the purpose. Concern for improper connection. Also, the four lintel beams are too wide for the post in use and the post was not intended to be used for four beams or an 8" lintel. The post appears to be designed to accomodate two beams or a 4" lintel, as shown by the post being installed sideways to allow all four beams to rest upon it. Recommend evaluation and any necessary mitigation by a licensed structural contractor."

How did I do? Or, is the install correct and i called out for a structural contractor for nothing?

Thanks as always gentlemen and any potential ladies.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Lintel 1.jpg (44.2 KB, 103 views)
File Type: jpg Lintel 2.jpg (24.2 KB, 78 views)
__________________
People Helping People. It's powerful stuff.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 04-26-2007, 08:54 PM
Jack Feldmann's Avatar
Jack Feldmann Jack Feldmann is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 538
Re: Not intended for Use?
Eric,
I agree with your concern about the nails. Obviously, lag screws are needed instead of nails barely holding on.

Did the tag on the post call out load capacity, or size of members it is designed to support?
JF
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 04-27-2007, 06:48 AM
Eric Smith Eric Smith is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Millersville, MD
Posts: 33
Re: Not intended for Use?
The tag on the post that you see on the left side was inaccessible. This was in a closet behind the furncae and I was not able to get behind the furnace to view the tag.
__________________
People Helping People. It's powerful stuff.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 04-27-2007, 01:38 PM
Bruce Breedlove's Avatar
Bruce Breedlove Bruce Breedlove is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 672
Re: Not intended for Use?
I only see two beams, not four. Regardless, it would appear to be an improper loading condition on the bearing plate of the post. With two beams acting independently, i.e., not bolted together, the loads being applied to the bearing plate are eccentric, i.e., applied beyond the support point of the plate. With the plate essentially cantilevered out from the post it may be overstressed in bending. (Judging by the size of the wood beams and the fact that two or four were required the loads are probably quite high.

It there are four beams then the concern would be even greater with the loads from the outer two beams being even more eccentric.
__________________
"Baseball is like church. Many attend but few understand." Leo Durocher
Bruce Breedlove
www.avaloninspection.com
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 04-27-2007, 02:06 PM
Eric Smith Eric Smith is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Millersville, MD
Posts: 33
Re: Not intended for Use?
You know what Bruce, there may just be 2 beams, on the left they appear to be 2x's but on the right it looks to be one 4x. I may have just assumed 2x's (wrong profession for making assumptions right).

Eccentric loading is the word I was looking for that day.
__________________
People Helping People. It's powerful stuff.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 04-27-2007, 07:50 PM
Bruce Breedlove's Avatar
Bruce Breedlove Bruce Breedlove is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 672
Re: Not intended for Use?
Eric,

A possible fix is to install gusset plates between the bearing plate and the post. But that call is the job of the structural engineer.
__________________
"Baseball is like church. Many attend but few understand." Leo Durocher
Bruce Breedlove
www.avaloninspection.com
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 04-28-2007, 04:13 AM
John Arnold John Arnold is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Philadelphia PA
Posts: 1,200
Re: Not intended for Use?
"potential ladies"?
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 04-28-2007, 06:30 AM
Eric Smith Eric Smith is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Millersville, MD
Posts: 33
Re: Not intended for Use?
John, just two days ago I saw a woman driving a US Inspect truck with the shirt on. I can only assume that she was an inspector. Assuming that, perhaps she reads inspection news.

But the way you have pasted my line it reads as if I was saying that some of you may morph into ladies at some point. Not the way I meant it!
__________________
People Helping People. It's powerful stuff.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 04-28-2007, 11:13 AM
John Arnold John Arnold is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Philadelphia PA
Posts: 1,200
Re: Not intended for Use?
Eric - I just thought "potential ladies" was funny. I suppose we're all "potential" ladies, given the hormone and surgery options available today.
And we definitely have some female inspectors on this forum from time to time.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 04-28-2007, 10:06 PM
Tim Moreira's Avatar
Tim Moreira Tim Moreira is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: New Port Richey, Fl
Posts: 446
Re: Not intended for Use?
Eric,

Quote:
I can only assume that she was an inspector.
You should get more PC in today's world.

She is an *inspectoret*.

Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 04-28-2007, 10:09 PM
Thom Walker's Avatar
Thom Walker Thom Walker is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Corpus Christi, TX
Posts: 582
Re: Not intended for Use?
Eric,
What size shirt did the truck take?
__________________
The only reason some people get lost in thought is because it's unfamiliar territory.
- Paul Fix
Reply With Quote
Are inspection referrals from past clients important to you? If so, click here to get even more referrals!
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:06 AM.


Design by Vjacheslav Trushkin.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8
vB.Sponsors
All Rights Reserved. Hann Tech Marketing Link / InspectionNews.com / InspectionNews.net - No part of InspectionNews.net may be reproduced in any way, or by any means, without the prior written permission of InspectionNews.net. Use of any index or listing Software for the purpose of constructing a mailing list, creating promotional materials or producing a printed or electronic catalog of any kind is expressly forbidden without the prior written permission of InspectionNews.net - All text, graphics and design on InspectionNews.net is copyright by Hann Tech Marketing Links.
Ad Management by RedTyger