Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Colorado Springs, CO
    Posts
    1,217

    Default Appeal Denied - RE Agent / Seller Failure To Disclose & Fraud

    In Ohio a real estate agent and his partner lost their appeal of a lower court's verdict in a civil suit brought against them by the buyer of a house they owned and sold. The buyer claimed the sellers committed fraud by failing to disclose known defects and had been awarded over $53,000 in damages. A home inspector and his recommendations figured prominently in the decision.

    You can read the Ohio Court of Appeals' decision here: MELENIK v. McMANAMON

    The sellers did not disclose previous foundation repairs, known existing foundation problems or known code violations. The sellers claimed they are not responsible because the buyer hired a home inspector (who specifically excluded zoning and building code violations from his agreement) and did not follow the inspector's recommendation that she consult with a structural engineer concerning a bowed wall. The primary structural problem - a different foundation wall that had shifted off its footing - was hidden behind a finished wall at the time of the inspection and was not visible - or disclosed - to the inspector.

    The court's decision is an interesting read. For home inspectors there are probably many lessons to be learned from this case.

    Similar Threads:
    Member Benefits1
    "Baseball is like church. Many attend but few understand." Leo Durocher
    Bruce Breedlove
    www.avaloninspection.com

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Chicago, IL
    Posts
    2,797

    Default Re: Appeal Denied - RE Agent / Seller Failure To Disclose & Fraud

    I struggle constantly with the issue of report preparation time vs adequate documentation of limitations - this case is a good example of why.

    Michael Thomas
    Paragon Property Services Inc., Chicago IL
    http://paragoninspects.com

  3. #3
    Ted Menelly's Avatar
    Ted Menelly Guest

    Default Re: Appeal Denied - RE Agent / Seller Failure To Disclose & Fraud

    Quote Originally Posted by Bruce Breedlove View Post
    In Ohio a real estate agent and his partner lost their appeal of a lower court's verdict in a civil suit brought against them by the buyer of a house they owned and sold. The buyer claimed the sellers committed fraud by failing to disclose known defects and had been awarded over $53,000 in damages. A home inspector and his recommendations figured prominently in the decision.

    You can read the Ohio Court of Appeals' decision here: MELENIK v. McMANAMON

    The sellers did not disclose previous foundation repairs, known existing foundation problems or known code violations. The sellers claimed they are not responsible because the buyer hired a home inspector (who specifically excluded zoning and building code violations from his agreement) and did not follow the inspector's recommendation that she consult with a structural engineer concerning a bowed wall. The primary structural problem - a different foundation wall that had shifted off its footing - was hidden behind a finished wall at the time of the inspection and was not visible - or disclosed - to the inspector.

    The court's decision is an interesting read. For home inspectors there are probably many lessons to be learned from this case.
    I know nothing of anything that a seller has to disclose anything to a home inspector. The seller has absolutely no ties or obligations to a home inspector.

    Even if the inspector saw or did not see a problem of an existing concern or a past concern does not take any obligation away from the seller to disclose anything to the buyer. The buyer is solely responsible for the disclosure to the buyer. Of course if the inspector missing something then he is liable but it still takes nothing away from the sellers obligation.

    As far as the buyer not following a home inspectors recommendation....It takes nothing away from the obligation of the sellers to disclose.

    Nothing new here as far as I can see.


  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Memphis TN.
    Posts
    4,311

    Default Re: Appeal Denied - RE Agent / Seller Failure To Disclose & Fraud

    Quote Originally Posted by Bruce Breedlove View Post
    I

    The sellers did not disclose previous foundation repairs, known existing foundation problems or known code violations. The sellers claimed they are not responsible because the buyer hired a home inspector (who specifically excluded zoning and building code violations from his agreement) and did not follow the inspector's recommendation that she consult with a structural engineer concerning a bowed wall. The primary structural problem - a different foundation wall that had shifted off its footing - was hidden behind a finished wall at the time of the inspection and was not visible - or disclosed - to the inspector.

    The court's decision is an interesting read. For home inspectors there are probably many lessons to be learned from this case.
    .
    .

    Quote Originally Posted by Ted Menelly View Post
    I know nothing of anything that a seller has to disclose anything to a home inspector. The seller has absolutely no ties or obligations to a home inspector.

    Even if the inspector saw or did not see a problem of an existing concern or a past concern does not take any obligation away from the seller to disclose anything to the buyer. The buyer is solely responsible for the disclosure to the buyer. Of course if the inspector missing something then he is liable but it still takes nothing away from the sellers obligation.

    As far as the buyer not following a home inspectors recommendation....It takes nothing away from the obligation of the sellers to disclose.

    Nothing new here as far as I can see.
    .
    .
    Ted,

    Remember this is a Record of a Judicial Precceding.

    If the Inspector was found of either not reporting instead of not being able to see the defect because it was not visible he would be liable.

    If the Inspector was found he had the information through disclosure and had not informed his client then he would be a Conspirator in the Fraud the Courts ruled upon.
    .
    For me it appeared the Court took great pain to shred each point ( excuse why they Lied ) of the appeal as a future precedence.
    .
    * the Buyer don't need no damages, She was Foreclosed on and this money will not be used to make Repairers.
    .
    ** Sorry Charlie You Committed Fraud and You Pay !

    .

    ***IMPORTANT*** You Need To Register To View Images ***IMPORTANT*** You Need To Register To View Images
    Last edited by Billy Stephens; 03-21-2010 at 05:58 PM. Reason: spelling
    It Might have Choked Artie But it ain't gone'a choke Stymie! Our Gang " The Pooch " (1932)
    Billy J. Stephens HI Service Memphis TN.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Fletcher, NC
    Posts
    28,032

    Default Re: Appeal Denied - RE Agent / Seller Failure To Disclose & Fraud

    Quote Originally Posted by Billy Stephens View Post
    ** Sorry Charlie You Commented Fraud and You Pay !

    "Commented" fraud.

    Jerry Peck
    Construction/Litigation/Code Consultant - Retired
    www.AskCodeMan.com

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Memphis TN.
    Posts
    4,311

    Default Re: Appeal Denied - RE Agent / Seller Failure To Disclose & Fraud

    Quote Originally Posted by Billy Stephens View Post
    .
    .
    .
    .
    ** Sorry Charlie You Committed Fraud and You Pay !

    .
    Quote Originally Posted by Jerry Peck View Post
    "Commented fraud".
    .
    oops.
    * yeah that be what they did.
    .

    ***IMPORTANT*** You Need To Register To View Images ***IMPORTANT*** You Need To Register To View Images
    It Might have Choked Artie But it ain't gone'a choke Stymie! Our Gang " The Pooch " (1932)
    Billy J. Stephens HI Service Memphis TN.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •